City, Regional and Remote: Where Australians Live by Remoteness, and How the Places Differ

City, Regional and Remote: Where Australians Live by Remoteness, and How the Places Differ

At the 2021 Census, 72.2% of Australians lived in a major city and 26.0% in a regional area. Remote and very remote Australia together were home to 470,053 people: 1.9% of the population. The five classes differ in more than distance. Inner regional areas are the oldest, with 22.2% of residents aged 65 and over, and very remote areas the youngest, at 10.5%. In very remote areas 18.5% of households had no motor vehicle and 21.6% of people who travelled to work walked.

Data anchors · Node reading for Service Proximity (24145): NIL RETURN. This article rests on the source data alone · 18.32 million residents (72.2%) in major cities, 6.58 million (26.0%) in regional areas, 470,053 (1.9%) in remote and very remote areas · aged 65 and over: 15.7% in major cities, 22.2% in inner regional areas, 10.5% in very remote areas.
Remoteness Areas are the ABS classification of every part of Australia by road distance to service centres. Figures are from the Census of 10 August 2021.

What is measured

The Australian Bureau of Statistics divides the country into five classes of remoteness: Major Cities of Australia, Inner Regional Australia, Outer Regional Australia, Remote Australia and Very Remote Australia. The classes rest on a measure of the road distance from each populated place to the nearest service centres of five sizes, with the population of a centre standing in for the services it is likely to offer. Remoteness is a measure of relative access by road. It does not say which services a place has, or whether they have capacity.

This article uses the 2021 Census counts published for each class. People are counted where they usually live. The 52,920 people with no usual address, or counted offshore or in transit, are left out.

Where people live

Residents by remoteness class, Australia, 2021
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%Major Cities72.2% (18,315,045)Inner Regional17.9% (4,535,756)Outer Regional8.1% (2,049,013)Remote1.1% (287,364)Very Remote0.7% (182,689)

APN calculation based on Australian Bureau of Statistics data: Census of Population and Housing: General Community Profile, 2021, Table G01 (selected person characteristics) by Remoteness Area (Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3). Usual residents with a usual address in one of the five remoteness classes. Share of residents, with the number in each class.

More than seven in ten Australians, 18.32 million people, lived in a major city. A further 4.54 million lived in inner regional areas and 2.05 million in outer regional areas. Remote Australia had 287,364 residents and very remote Australia 182,689.

State by state

State or territoryResidentsMajor CitiesInner RegionalOuter RegionalRemoteVery Remote
New South Wales8,060,78575.4%19.5%4.7%0.3%0.1%
Victoria6,494,36777.3%18.7%4.0%0.1%none
Queensland5,141,28364.8%19.4%13.4%1.4%1.0%
South Australia1,778,12675.6%9.9%11.3%2.5%0.8%
Western Australia2,651,45278.7%8.7%6.9%3.3%2.3%
Tasmania556,179none62.1%35.9%1.5%0.5%
Northern Territory229,004nonenone61.1%20.5%18.4%
Australian Capital Territory453,88899.8%0.2%nonenonenone
Australia25,369,86772.2%17.9%8.1%1.1%0.7%

APN calculation based on Australian Bureau of Statistics data: Census of Population and Housing: General Community Profile, 2021, Table G01 (selected person characteristics) by Remoteness Area (Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3). Usual residents with a usual address in one of the five remoteness classes. Share of each state or territory’s residents in each class, calculated before rounding. Australia includes the residents of the Other Territories.

The classification is national, so a state can have no area in a class. Tasmania and the Northern Territory have no major city on this measure: Hobart is classed as inner regional and Darwin as outer regional. Outside the Australian Capital Territory, Western Australia has the largest share of residents in major cities (78.7%) and Queensland the smallest among the mainland states (64.8%).

In the Northern Territory 38.9% of residents lived in remote or very remote areas, against 5.6% in Western Australia and 3.2% in South Australia. By number, Western Australia had the most remote and very remote residents (148,098), followed by Queensland (123,832) and the Northern Territory (89,102).

Who lives there

Share of residents aged 65 and over, by remoteness class, 2021
0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%40%Major Cities15.7% (under 15: 18.3%)Inner Regional22.2% (under 15: 17.8%)Outer Regional20.5% (under 15: 18.0%)Remote14.8% (under 15: 20.4%)Very Remote10.5% (under 15: 21.3%)

APN calculation based on Australian Bureau of Statistics data: Census of Population and Housing: General Community Profile, 2021, Table G01 (selected person characteristics) by Remoteness Area (Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3). Share of residents aged 65 and over; the share aged under 15 is shown beside each bar.

Age does not rise steadily with distance. The oldest populations are in inner and outer regional areas, where 22.2% and 20.5% of residents were aged 65 and over, against 15.7% in major cities. Remote and very remote areas are younger than the cities: 10.5% of very remote residents were 65 and over, and 21.3% were under 15.

Remoteness classResidentsAged 65 and overUnder 15Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait IslanderBorn overseas
Major Cities18,315,04515.7%18.3%1.8%34.9%
Inner Regional4,535,75622.2%17.8%4.5%13.9%
Outer Regional2,049,01320.5%18.0%7.3%15.0%
Remote287,36414.8%20.4%15.3%15.0%
Very Remote182,68910.5%21.3%40.6%11.2%

APN calculation based on Australian Bureau of Statistics data: Census of Population and Housing: General Community Profile, 2021, Table G01 (selected person characteristics) by Remoteness Area (Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3). Usual residents with a usual address in one of the five remoteness classes. The born overseas share leaves out people who did not state a birthplace.

Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander people were 1.8% of residents in major cities and 40.6% in very remote areas. Most nonetheless lived in cities and regional areas: 41.4% of Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander people counted in the five classes lived in a major city and 14.7% in remote or very remote areas. People born overseas were 34.9% of residents in major cities and between 11.2% and 15.0% in the other four classes.

Vehicles at home

Share of households with no motor vehicle, by remoteness class, 2021
0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%Major Cities8.2% (three or more 17.5%)Inner Regional4.8% (three or more 23.2%)Outer Regional5.1% (three or more 23.6%)Remote6.6% (three or more 24.0%)Very Remote18.5% (three or more 17.8%)

APN calculation based on Australian Bureau of Statistics data: Census of Population and Housing: General Community Profile, 2021, Table G34 (number of motor vehicles by dwellings) by Remoteness Area (Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3). Share of households with no motor vehicle, among occupied private dwellings that stated a number; the share with three or more is shown beside each bar.

Households in regional and remote areas keep more vehicles than those in the cities. The share with three or more was 17.5% in major cities and between 23.2% and 24.0% in inner regional, outer regional and remote areas. Very remote areas are the exception: 18.5% of households there had no motor vehicle, more than twice the share in major cities (8.2%). A companion article sets out how many motor vehicles households keep by state and suburb.

The trip to work

Share of people who travelled to work who walked, by remoteness class, Census day 2021
0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%Major Cities3.3% (car 83.1%)Inner Regional3.9% (car 90.3%)Outer Regional5.1% (car 88.3%)Remote9.1% (car 82.4%)Very Remote21.6% (car 62.5%)

APN calculation based on Australian Bureau of Statistics data: Census of Population and Housing: General Community Profile, 2021, Table G62 (method of travel to work) by Remoteness Area (Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3). Share of employed people who travelled to work on Tuesday 10 August 2021 who walked all the way; the share who went by car only, as driver or passenger, is shown beside each bar. Parts of the country were under stay-at-home orders that day.

Remoteness classWorked at homeOf those who travelled: carPublic transportWalked only
Major Cities24.4%83.1%8.9%3.3%
Inner Regional12.3%90.3%1.5%3.9%
Outer Regional9.6%88.3%1.7%5.1%
Remote9.1%82.4%2.1%9.1%
Very Remote8.4%62.5%6.5%21.6%

APN calculation based on Australian Bureau of Statistics data: Census of Population and Housing: General Community Profile, 2021, Table G62 (method of travel to work) by Remoteness Area (Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3). Employed people aged 15 and over on Tuesday 10 August 2021, when parts of the country were under stay-at-home orders. Worked at home is a share of all employed people; the other columns are shares of those who travelled. Public transport is a train, bus, ferry or tram as the only method, or a train or bus combined with another method.

Walking to work rises with each step away from the cities, from 3.3% of travellers in major cities to 9.1% in remote areas and 21.6% in very remote areas. Working at home runs the other way, from 24.4% of employed people in major cities to 8.4% in very remote areas. The city figure reflects the stay-at-home orders in force in parts of New South Wales and Victoria on Census day; a companion article sets out how Australians got to work on Census day 2021.

72.2%
Of Australians lived in a major city
470,053
Lived in remote or very remote areas
22.2%
Aged 65 and over, inner regional areas
18.5%
Of very remote households had no motor vehicle

What this does not show

Remoteness classes are broad. A regional city of 100,000 people and a town of 2,000 can fall in the same class, and conditions within a class differ widely between states. The classes describe road distance to centres of a given size, not the services actually present, their cost or their waiting times. The Census counts people where they usually live, so workers who fly in to a remote site and live elsewhere are counted at home. The travel figures describe one day in August 2021. Results from the August 2026 Census will show how these patterns have moved.

Methodology note. Node reading for Service Proximity (24145): NIL RETURN. This article rests on the source data alone. It uses tables G01, G34 and G62 of the 2021 Census General Community Profile by Remoteness Area, retrieved from the ABS Data API. Figures for each class are the sum of that class across the states and territories, including the Other Territories. People with no usual address and people counted offshore or in transit are left out. Shares of residents by age and by Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander status are shares of all residents in the class; the born overseas share leaves out people who did not state a birthplace. Vehicle shares are shares of occupied private dwellings that stated a number. People who travelled to work are all employed people less those who worked at home, did not go to work or did not state a method. The ABS makes small random adjustments to Census counts.
Sources

ABS material is used under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence. Calculations, standardisations and index readings are APN’s and are not attributable to the ABS.

Disclaimer

The analysis and information contained in this publication are for general informational and strategic purposes only and do not constitute financial, investment, legal, or any other form of professional advice. Australian Property Network is not a licensed financial advisor. Property values and market conditions can go up or down. Before making any property or investment decisions, you must conduct your own thorough research and seek independent professional advice tailored to your specific circumstances. Images are for illustrative purposes only. E.&O.E.

Findings are presented on the basis of data and evidence alone.

APN National
APN National

APN National is Australian Property Network's principal analysis desk, publishing APN's core research and market commentary across the economic, policy and structural forces shaping the Australian property market.

Leave a Reply