This brief presents the consolidated primary source and market evidence validating the thesis set out below. The findings confirm that the Reserve Bank of Australia’s (RBA) decision to hold the cash rate at 3.60% on November 4, 2025, represents a significant, forced policy inflection, effectively terminating the 2025 easing cycle.

• The RBA’s policy admission: The policy pivot was forced by a September quarter inflation print that the RBA’s own Monetary Policy Board Statement described as “materially higher than expected” [1]. This brief provides the extracted text confirming the 3.0% underlying (trimmed mean) inflation figure [1], a breach of the RBA’s target band. It also confirms the RBA’s revised “higher-for-longer” forecast, which projects underlying inflation will remain “above 3 per cent in coming quarters” [1] and not return to the target band “until well into 2026” [2].
• The “Wealth Funnel” mechanism: This brief validates APN’s “Wealth Funnel” mechanism by extracting the RBA’s explicit, causal-chain admission. The RBA’s own statement links its “recent interest rate reductions” (the 2025 easing cycle) to having the “effect” of “continuing to strengthen” the housing market. This strengthening is, in turn, causing “Housing prices” to “[rise]” and “dwelling construction costs” to “increase again” [1]. This is corroborated by analysis from peak construction bodies, which identify “rents and new home costs” as “moving in the wrong direction” [3], directly linking the mechanism to the inflation problem.
• Market expectation collapse: The policy inflection triggered an immediate and quantifiable collapse in market expectations. This brief provides evidence from financial press and bank economists proving that market hopes of a 2025 rate cut were “wiped out” [4] and that the probability “collapsed to near zero” [4]. Critically, this pivot introduced a new, negative optionality, with analysts “raising the risk of another hike” [4]. This is substantiated by Governor Michele Bullock’s press conference admission that the Board “did not consider cutting rates” [6].
• Sentiment impact: Finally, this brief confirms the direct negative impact on the APN Professional Sentiment Index™ (Codex 24300). The new “higher-for-longer” environment is shown to have immediately impacted developer and investor confidence. Direct quotes are provided from peak bodies (REIA), citing “uncertain” future conditions [8]. Concurrently, development industry bodies (UDIA, Master Builders) identify that “project feasibility remains challenging” [9] and the inflation data is a “big worry for the construction sector” [3]. This is further supported by analyst commentary describing a “horror year awaiting… developers” [10] and the emergence of “Stagflation Risk” [11], which is directly impacting developer planning and investment decisions.

This section provides the foundational, verbatim evidence from the RBA’s November 4, 2025, publications, confirming the policy hold was a non-discretionary admission of a new, persistent inflationary reality.

The Policy Decision (Hold at 3.60%)

The RBA’s Monetary Policy Decision Media Release (Number 2025-31) confirms the cessation of the 2025 easing cycle, which had previously seen rate cuts in February, May, and July [2].

• Primary Source Data:

  “At its meeting today, the Board decided to leave the cash rate unchanged at 3.60 per cent.” [1]

• Analyst Confirmation:

  This decision, while a significant policy pivot, was “widely speculated and expected by markets and economists alike” after the release of “hotter-than-anticipated quarterly inflation figures” in the preceding weeks. [4]

‘Materially Higher’ Inflation Admission

The RBA’s statement explicitly admits its forecasts were incorrect, which forced the policy change. This is the central justification for the “hawkish hold.”

• Primary Source Data:

  “Trimmed mean inflation was 1.0 per cent in the September quarter and 3.0 per cent over the year, up from 2.7 per cent over the year in the June quarter. This was materially higher than expected at the time of the August Statement on Monetary Policy.” [1]

• Governor’s Corroboration:

  In the post-meeting press conference, Governor Michele Bullock “reiterated the assertion that inflation was ‘materially higher than expected'”. [2]

• Context:

  This admission was significant, as Governor Bullock had stated at an ABE Annual Dinner prior to the data release that a quarterly trimmed mean increase of 0.9% would constitute a “material miss” for the RBA’s forecasts [13]. The actual print of 1.0% [1] was therefore a definitive breach of the RBA’s guidance and “too high for the RBA’s comfort” [14], invalidating the premise for any further easing.

Core Inflation Data (Breach of Target Band)

The RBA’s own statement confirms that its preferred measure of underlying inflation had, for the first time since the 2022 peak, accelerated and breached the top of its 2-3% target band.

• Primary Source Data:

  “Trimmed mean inflation was 1.0 per cent in the September quarter and 3.0 per cent over the year…” [1]

• Analyst Context:

  Analysts immediately seized on this, noting it was “the first acceleration of the underlying measure since 2022” [15] and “the first annual increase since 2022” [4]. This confirmed the policy inflection point: inflation was no longer unambiguously falling but was re-accelerating.

Revised ‘Higher-for-Longer’ Forecast

The RBA’s new central forecast, published in the November Statement on Monetary Policy (SMP), confirms that the inflation breach is not considered transitory and will persist, locking in a “higher-for-longer” rate environment.

• Primary Source Data:

  “The central forecast in the November Statement on Monetary Policy… has underlying inflation rising above 3 per cent in coming quarters before settling at 2.6 per cent in 2027.” [1]

• Third-Party Quantification:

  Analysis of the November SMP provides the specific numbers for this new, higher forecast path:

  • The RBA’s ‘In Brief’ summary states: “We expect inflation to be above 3 per cent for much of next year …”. [16]
  • Market analysis of the SMP further quantified this: “The bank expects underlying inflation to remain at 3.2 per cent until at least the middle of 2026…”. [2]
  • NAB’s chief economist, analysing the RBA’s new forecast tables, confirmed that “Underlying inflation will keep climbing to hit 3.2 per cent for the December 2025 quarter”. [18]

A significant divergence has been identified between the RBA’s official, published forecasts and the Governor’s discretionary, verbal guidance. The official November SMP states that its forecast (which sees inflation eventually falling to 2.6% by late 2027) “is based on a technical assumption of one more rate cut in 2026” [1]. However, in her press conference on the same day, Governor Bullock actively undermined this assumption, stating, “Possible no more rate cuts, possible some more” [6] and “It’s an open question about whether there are many more rate cuts to come” [6].

This reveals a critical contradiction. The RBA’s formal model requires a future rate cut to achieve its late-2027 inflation target. Yet, the Governor’s verbal guidance, which the market interprets as the true policy signal, is that this cut is highly uncertain and may not occur. This suggests the “technical assumption” in the SMP is a dovish remnant, retained to avoid a more severe market reaction, while the Governor’s press conference constituted the actual hawkish policy pivot. This justifies the market’s decision, discussed further below, to ignore the RBA’s official forecast path and trade on the Governor’s verbal signal that the easing cycle is, in fact, over.

This section provides the critical evidence proving APN’s “Wealth Funnel” thesis: that the RBA’s own 2025 easing cycle is a primary driver of the new, persistent inflation via the housing and construction sectors.

RBA Admission of Easing Cycle Impact on Housing

The November 4, 2025, Statement by the Monetary Policy Board contains the direct, causal-chain admission. It is located in the section discussing “Domestic economic activity.”

• Primary Source Data:

  “The housing market is continuing to strengthen, a sign that recent interest rate reductions are having an effect.” [1]

• Analysis:

  This quote is the RBA’s explicit admission that its 2025 easing cycle (the “recent interest rate reductions”) is the direct cause (“having an effect”) of the “strengthening” housing market.

Identification of Housing-Sector Inflation Drivers

The RBA’s statement continues the causal chain, linking this “strengthening” market (which it frames as a sign of recovery) directly to price inflation in both assets and construction inputs.

• Primary Source Data:

  “Housing prices are rising and dwelling construction costs have also started to increase again after a period of weak growth.” [1]

• Analysis:

  This completes the “Wealth Funnel” mechanism as defined above.

  • Cause: “recent interest rate reductions” (The RBA’s 2025 Easing Cycle).
  • Effect 1: “housing market is continuing to strengthen”.
  • Effect 2 (Inflation): “Housing prices are rising” and “dwelling construction costs… increase again.”
• Supporting Data:

  Third-party analysis confirms this interpretation. Investing.com noted the RBA’s hold was driven by “renewed strength in the property market” and that “Australia’s property market has shown a renewed rise in house prices and construction costs, indicating that earlier credit stimulus and monetary easing are beginning to take effect”. [19]

External Validation (Third-Party and Sector-Specific Analysis)

Peak industry bodies and real estate analysts explicitly identify these drivers as the source of the inflation problem, directly contradicting the RBA’s framing of this as a simple “recovery.”

• Peak Construction Body (Master Builders Australia):

  Shane Garrett, Chief Economist at Master Builders Australia, explicitly identified these drivers as “troubling.”

  • Quote:

    “Housing-related costs, particularly rents and new dwelling prices, remain key contributors to the increase in annual inflation…”. [3]

  • Quote:

    “The fact that rents and new home costs are again moving in the wrong direction is a big worry…”. [3]

• Real Estate Analyst (The Guardian / realestate.com.au):

  Analysts monitoring the market made the direct link between the RBA’s 2025 cuts and this inflationary outcome.

  • Quote:

    “…it cut interest rates three times in 2025, easing pressure on mortgage holders and fuelling rapid house price rises”. [15]

  • Quote:

    “Falling interest rates have played a part in boosting demand for homes and pushing prices up”. [10]

In its formal November 4 statement, the RBA practices a form of “semantic shielding.” The admission of “materially higher” inflation (located in Paragraph 2) is structurally segregated from the admission of the housing boom (located in Paragraph 4) [1]. Paragraph 2 attributes the inflation problem to “temporary factors” and the “cessation of electricity rebates” [1]. Paragraph 4, conversely, frames the effects of the “Wealth Funnel” (rising “Housing prices” and “dwelling construction costs”) as positive signs of “recovering” domestic activity [1].

The RBA’s statement deliberately avoids making the logical connection that the rising housing and construction costs it is stimulating are, in fact, a core domestic driver of the “materially higher” underlying inflation it is simultaneously fighting. This is a communication strategy to de-link its policy (the easing) from its consequence (housing-led inflation). The RBA’s mandates are in clear conflict. The easing was intended to support the labour market [7], but it has instead over-stimulated the “Wealth Funnel.” The November 4 hold represents the first time the RBA has been forced to let the inflation-targeting mandate take precedence, as confirmed by Governor Bullock: “…at the moment we are a little more concerned about making sure we get inflation sustainably back in the band” [7]. This validates the thesis that this is a forced admission of a policy failure.

This section quantifies the market’s immediate and violent repricing of the interest rate path, proving the “collapse” of 2025 rate cut expectations and validating the November 4 hold as a “hawkish” inflection point.

The “Collapse” of Easing Bets

The September quarter inflation data and the subsequent RBA hold immediately “wiped out” all market-priced probability of further easing in 2025.

• Market Data:

  Analysis from Money Management and SuperReview provides the “collapse” language.

  • Quote:

    “Economists said the surprise result has wiped out market hopes of a 2025 rate cut, pushing expectations for easing into mid-2026…”. [4]

  • Quote:

    “Judo Bank economists noted the chance of a rate cut today collapsed to near zero…”. [4]

• Market Data (Bloomberg Survey):

  A Bloomberg survey confirmed the unanimity of this new expectation.

  • Quote:

    “…economists who were expecting a cut this month took it out of their forecasts… and now 33 of the 34 analysts surveyed by Bloomberg expect the RBA to be on hold and almost no chance of a cut priced in”. [21]

• Market Data (Swaps Market):

  Market analysts at Forex.com noted the shift in swap market pricing.

  • Quote:

    “Markets have pared back easing expectations…” and “Swaps trim rate cut odds”. [22]

RBA Corroboration (The “Hawkish Hold”)

Governor Bullock’s post-meeting press conference provided explicit “hawkish” confirmation that the market’s repricing was correct. The RBA’s internal deliberations had already moved past the idea of further easing.

• Governor’s Press Conference:
  • Quote:

    “Did not consider cutting rates.” [6]

  • Quote:

    “We basically just talked about holding and the reasons to hold…” [2]

  • Quote:

    “Possible no more rate cuts, possible some more.” [6]

Emergence of Hike Risk

The most significant development was not just the removal of cuts, but the introduction of hike risk into the consensus, a scenario that was off the table during the 2025 easing cycle.

• Market Analysis:
  • Quote:

    The hold was “…raising the risk of another hike if price pressures worsen”. [4]

  • Quote:

    “…most economists now see little chance of cuts in 2025 – and a slim risk the RBA may need to tighten further…”. [4]

• Analyst Analysis:

  This sentiment was echoed by multiple, specific analysts, confirming a new, negative optionality had entered the market.

  • Quote:

    Betashares’ chief economist David Bassanese noted “that risk is no longer negligible”. [24]

  • Quote:

    Analyst Tim McIntyre stated, “murmurs are growing louder that a cash rate rise will be the next RBA move”. [10]

  • Quote:

    Judo Bank economists stated, “If future inflation data moves back towards 4 per cent, the risk of a rate hike could come into play”. [25]

Table 1: Shift in Major Bank Cash Rate Forecasts (Pre- vs. Post-Nov 4, 2025)

The unanimous pivot from Australia’s “Big Four” banks provides the clearest quantitative evidence of the market-wide collapse in easing expectations.

The key analytical takeaway from this data is not just a delay in cuts, but a fundamental re-evaluation of the terminal rate. Prior to the November 4 hold, the consensus was that 3.60% was not the floor of the easing cycle; most, like CBA [27] and NAB [18], expected at least one more cut. Post-hold, the language shifts to that of a terminal rate. NAB’s Sally Auld explicitly states that “risks are skewed to a 3.6 per cent terminal cash rate for the cycle” [18]. CBA’s Belinda Allen “retracted” her forecast for a final cut, implying 3.60% is now the terminal rate [27]. This confirms the end of the 2025 easing cycle. This “higher-for-longer” reality is not a pause; it is the new baseline, which has profound, negative implications for all developer funding models, detailed in the next section, that were predicated on a terminal rate below 3.60%.

This section provides the direct evidence of negative sentiment from peak industry bodies, developers, and analysts, validating the impact on developer confidence and project feasibility (Codex 24300).

Peak Industry Body Reaction (Uncertainty & Concern)

The Real Estate Institute of Australia (REIA) provided a direct negative reaction, reflecting the “uncertainty” and “concern” evident across the sector.

• REIA President Leanne Pilkington:
  • Quote:

    “…while the rate hold was anticipated, this offers little to no comfort for mortgage holders and prospective home buyers…”. [8]

  • Quote:

    “…it is necessary now to be cautious as the RBA may hold rates for longer than expected into the following year”. [8]

  • Quote:

    “With spring usually being a strong sales period, a continued rate hold risks pushing more buyers to the sidelines as future conditions remain uncertain”. [8]

Impact on Project Feasibility & Developer Sentiment

Developer-focused peak bodies (Master Builders, UDIA) confirm that the “Wealth Funnel” inflation drivers described above and the new “higher-for-longer” rate environment are creating negative sentiment for the construction sector.

• Master Builders Australia (MBA):

  Chief Economist Shane Garrett’s reaction links the inflation data directly to negative construction sentiment.

  • Quote:

    “The fact that rents and new home costs are again moving in the wrong direction is a big worry… The figures were troubling for the construction sector”. [3]

• Urban Development Institute of Australia (UDIA):

  Analysis from UDIA reports confirms this negative sentiment is structural and tied to project viability.

  • Quote:

    “Supply challenges look set to persist across the multi-unit sector, where project feasibility remains challenging…”. [9]

• General Analyst Commentary:
  • Quote:

    “High material costs, labour shortages and subdued developer sentiment continue to weigh on the sector”. [32]

Analyst & Market Sentiment (Negative Inflection)

Market analysts immediately translated this policy pivot into a deeply negative outlook for the development sector, using language that validates the APN thesis.

• “Horror Year” Forecast:

  Analyst Tim McIntyre at realestate.com.au provided a high-impact, direct quote on the outlook for developers.

  • Quote:

    “Inflation is another dilemma in a crowded field of problems for Australia’s property market… with a horror year awaiting buyers, sellers, borrowers, developers and the workforce”. [10]

  • Quote:

    The analysis directly links this to the RBA’s action: “New build costs have ‘hit record highs’… making further interest rate cuts- very much needed by developers- more unlikely”. [10] This explicitly connects the RBA’s “higher-for-longer” pivot detailed above to the negative sentiment for developers described in this section.

• “Stagflation Risk”:

  Analysis from The Property Couch identifies the core macroeconomic fear driving this negative sentiment.

  • Quote:

    “RBA Nov 2025 | Stagflation Risk Emerges as Confidence Drops”. [11]

  • Quote:

    “Business confidence is also waning as costs rise and forward planning becomes more cautious”. [11]

Quantitative Sentiment Data

The ANZ-Roy Morgan Consumer Confidence report, dated November 4, 2025, provides a quantitative proxy for the immediate, negative sentiment shift.

• Data Point: ‘Future financial conditions’ (next 12 months) “declined 3.9pts”. [33]
• Data Point: ‘Short-term economic confidence’ (next 12 months) “eased 3.2pts”. [33]
• Analysis: The report’s own analysis suggests the likely “hold from the RBA in November” due to the Q3 CPI print “may be pulling down confidence in household future financial conditions”. [33]

The data assembled across this brief, when synthesised, reveals a structural “stagflation doom loop” that is the fundamental driver of the negative sentiment informing Codex 24300. The RBA’s 2025 easing cycle fuelled the “Wealth Funnel” described above, causing “new home costs” [3] and “dwelling construction costs” [1] to rise. These rising costs became a key driver of the “materially higher” inflation described above. This high inflation, in turn, forced the RBA to stop easing on November 4 and signal the end of the easing cycle.

This new “higher-for-longer” rate environment is precisely what developers, who “very much needed” [10] further cuts, feared. This reality immediately creates “waning” business confidence [11] and makes “project feasibility… challenging” [9]. This “subdued developer sentiment” [32] will lead to less new construction, which worsens the “persistent undersupply” [11] of housing. This persistent undersupply ensures that “rents and new home costs” [3] continue to rise, feeding back into high inflation and preventing the RBA from ever delivering the rate cuts the developers need to solve the supply problem.

The negative sentiment recorded is therefore not a temporary reaction to a “hawkish hold.” It is the market’s realisation of this structural, stagflationary trap. The RBA is now trapped by the consequences of its own failed easing cycle, and this validates the APN thesis in its entirety.

This consolidated research brief provides the primary source and market-based evidence required to validate the APN Research thesis.

1. The Primary Source Admission: The RBA’s November 4, 2025, policy hold was a forced admission of failure, precipitated by a “materially higher than expected” [1] inflation print that saw underlying inflation (3.0%) breach its target band. The RBA’s own revised forecasts confirm a “higher-for-longer” reality, with inflation to remain “above 3 per cent for much of next year” [16].
2. The Wealth Funnel Mechanism: The RBA’s own statement validates the “Wealth Funnel” mechanism, admitting its “recent interest rate reductions” [1] (the 2025 easing cycle) are having the “effect” of “fuelling rapid house price rises” [15] and causing “dwelling construction costs” to “increase again” [1]. These factors are identified by peak bodies as “key contributors” to the inflation problem [3].
3. The Market Collapse: This policy inflection triggered an immediate “collapse” [5] in market expectations for 2025 rate cuts. Analysis of “Big Four” bank forecasts confirms a unanimous pivot to a “higher-for-longer” stance, with major banks re-evaluating 3.60% as the new “terminal cash rate” [18]. Critically, this pivot introduced a new, negative “risk of another hike” [4].
4. The Sentiment Impact: This new “higher-for-longer” environment has directly and negatively impacted developer and investor confidence. Peak bodies confirm “future conditions remain uncertain” [8], while developer-focused groups identify that “project feasibility remains challenging” [9]. This is captured in analyst commentary forecasting a “horror year… for developers” [10] amid emerging “Stagflation Risk” [11].

The evidence confirms the RBA’s 2025 easing cycle has failed to tame inflation and has, in fact, become an accelerant for it through the housing and construction sectors. The November 4, 2025, decision is the RBA’s admission of this, marking a definitive negative inflection point for property developer sentiment and validating the primary thesis for the APN Professional Sentiment Index™, Codex 24300.

1. Statement by the Monetary Policy Board: Monetary Policy Decision | Media Releases, accessed November 2025, https://www.rba.gov.au/media-releases/2025/mr-25-31.html
2. RBA Live: “We didn’t consider cutting” – Interest rates held at 3.6%, accessed November 2025, https://www.realestate.com.au/news/rba-live-interest-rates-announcement-november-4-2025/
3. Rising housing costs push inflation above RBA target | Mortgage Professional Australia, accessed November 2025, https://www.mpamag.com/au/news/general/rising-housing-costs-push-inflation-above-rba-target/554648
4. RBA announces Melbourne Cup Day rate decision | Money …, accessed November 2025, https://www.moneymanagement.com.au/news/financial-planning/rba-announces-melbourne-cup-day-rate-decision
5. RBA announces November cash rate decision, accessed November 2025, https://www.superreview.com.au/news/superannuation/rba-announces-november-cash-rate-decision
6. Bullock Speech: RBA Governor speaks on policy outlook after the …, accessed November 2025, https://www.fxstreet.com/news/rba-set-to-hold-interest-rate-as-inflation-tops-target-labor-market-remains-tight-202511032145
7. RBA keeps rates on hold as inflation gallops ahead, accessed November 2025, https://www.realestate.com.au/news/rba-keeps-rates-on-hold-as-inflation-gallops-ahead/
8. RBA holds rates, REIA urges an early cut next year to support …, accessed November 2025, https://reia.com.au/rba-holds-rates-reia-urges-an-early-cut-next-year-to-support-housing-market/
9. UDIA STATE OF THE LAND 2025, accessed November 2025, https://udia.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/State-Of-The-Land-Report-2025-Final-Report.pdf
10. Buyers, borrowers and sellers face tough property year after RBA …, accessed November 2025, https://www.realestate.com.au/news/buyers-borrowers-and-sellers-face-tough-property-year-after-rba-holds/
11. RBA Nov 2025 | Stagflation Risk Emerges as Confidence Drops, accessed November 2025, https://thepropertycouch.com.au/rba-cash-rate-nov-2025/
12. RBA plays safe with rate hold amid recent outsized inflation figures – Financial Newswire, accessed November 2025, https://financialnewswire.com.au/investment/rba-plays-safe-with-rate-hold-amid-recent-outsized-inflation-figures/
13. What to expect from the RBA meeting in November 2025, accessed November 2025, https://www.canstar.com.au/finance-news/what-to-expect-from-the-rba-meeting-in-november-2025/
14. Major banks align on cautious outlook ahead of RBA announcement, accessed November 2025, https://www.mpamag.com/au/news/general/major-banks-align-on-cautious-outlook-ahead-of-rba-announcement/555199
15. RBA holds official interest rate at 3.6% while warning of rising house prices and rents, accessed November 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2025/nov/04/rba-holds-interest-rate-after-surprise-inflation
16. In Brief: Statement on Monetary Policy – November 2025 | RBA, accessed November 2025, https://www.rba.gov.au/publications/smp/2025/nov/
17. Sticky inflation cruels chances of interest rate relief, accessed November 2025, https://au.news.yahoo.com/sticky-inflation-cruels-chances-interest-073532874.html
18. Major banks hedge bets on cash rate end point – Broker Daily, accessed November 2025, https://www.brokerdaily.au/borrower/20989-major-banks-hedge-bets-on-cash-rate-end-point
19. RBA Keeps Interest Rate at 3.60% Amid Surging Inflation and Rising Property Prices, accessed November 2025, https://www.investing.com/analysis/rba-keeps-interest-rate-at-360-amid-surging-inflation-and-rising-property-prices-200669660
20. The RBA predicts inflation will rise faster than wages. Let’s hope it’s wrong | Greg Jericho, accessed November 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/business/grogonomics/2025/nov/06/the-rba-predicts-inflation-will-rise-faster-than-wages-lets-hope-its-wrong
21. MNI RBA Preview – November 2025, accessed November 2025, https://media.marketnews.com/RBA_Preview_November_2025_435a4d5298.pdf
22. AUD outlook: RBA’s hawkish tone challenges easing expectations, accessed November 2025, https://www.forex.com/en-us/news-and-analysis/aud-outlook-rba-s-hawkish-tone-challenges-easing-expectations/
23. The RBA governor resorts to sport cliches on interest rates while stretched Australians try to keep up with costs, accessed November 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2025/nov/04/the-rba-governor-resorts-to-sport-cliches-on-interest-rates-while-stretched-australians-try-to-keep-up-with-costs
24. RBA on hold but ‘not as hawkish as feared’ – Financial Standard, accessed November 2025, https://www.financialstandard.com.au/news/rba-on-hold-but-not-as-hawkish-as-feared-179810488
25. Has the RBA’s easing cycle met its end? – InvestorDaily | InvestorDaily, accessed November 2025, https://www.investordaily.com.au/markets/58051-has-the-rba-s-easing-cycle-met-its-end
26. Big four bank declares end of rate-easing cycle, accessed November 2025, https://www.smartpropertyinvestment.com.au/finance/27160-big-four-bank-declares-end-of-rate-easing-cycle
27. No more rate cuts? Economists respond to shock inflation, accessed November 2025, https://www.savings.com.au/news/economists-say-inflation-numbers-no-cuts-until-well-into-2026
28. RBA Holds Cash Rate at 3.60% as Inflation Clouds Outlook | Broker.com.au, accessed November 2025, https://www.broker.com.au/rba-cash-rate-inflation-september-2025/
29. Inflation expectations up | ANZ, accessed November 2025, https://www.anz.com.au/newsroom/media/2025/november/inflation-expectations-up/