This report presents a definitive stress test of the “Electron Valuation” hypothesis. The investigation, grounded in late 2025 market data, unequivocally validates the structural decoupling of industrial land valuation from surface area ($/m²) to grid capacity ($/MW). The Australian industrial property market has undergone a fundamental fracture, creating a two-speed ecosystem where the “Data Centre Premium” effectively demonetises unpowered logistics sites while driving valuations for “Power Shells” to levels previously unseen in the asset class.

The investigation confirms that the claimed “300% premium” is not merely anecdotal but supported by transaction data in key precincts such as Mamre Road (Western Sydney) and Truganina (Melbourne). As of late 2025, the market is characterised by an unprecedented collision of hyperscale demand, driven by the AI inflection point, and a rigid, constrained electrical grid. This collision has birthed a new asset class where the physical land is secondary to the secured high-voltage connection capacity.

We identify three critical dynamics driving this phenomenon:

1. The Demand Shock: Validated by the M3 Property November 2025 report, showing a fortyfold expansion in capacity and a shift to “AI-Native” density.¹
2. The Valuation Fracture: Empirical evidence of a price chasm between Tier 1 (Power-Ready) and Tier 2 (Logistics) land, with premiums exceeding 100-200% in constrained zones.²
3. Grid Strangulation: The physical limit of value creation, defined by AEMO connection queues exceeding 18 GW in Victoria alone,⁴ creating a regulatory and physical moat around existing approvals.

The investigation also dismantles the “Off-Grid” counter-narrative. While gas generation is technically feasible, the NSW EPA’s regulatory firewall and the net-zero mandates attached to major approvals (such as the CDC Marsden Park project) render the “island mode” data centre a niche, transitional solution rather than a scalable valuation bypass.⁵

The following comprehensive brief details the mechanics of this fracture, providing the evidentiary basis for a complete recalibration of industrial investment strategy.

The genesis of the “Megawatt Fracture” is an unprecedented demand shock that has overwhelmed historical planning models and utility forecasts. The release of the M3 Property “Data Centre Growth In Australia” report in November 2025 provides the quantitative baseline required to validate the demand-side pressures forcing valuations upward. This is not a cyclical upswing; it is a structural re-rating of the digital economy’s physical footprint.

The Fortyfold Expansion: A Historical Anomaly

The trajectory of the Australian data centre sector, as outlined by M3 Property, is exponential. The sector has expanded fortyfold over the past two decades, growing from a negligible national occupancy of 37 megawatts (MW) in 2005 to a staggering 1,315 MW in 2025.¹

Critically, this growth is not linear. It is heavily back-loaded, with two-thirds of this capacity expansion occurring within the last five years.¹ This acceleration signifies a compression of land absorption cycles. What previously took a decade to absorb is now being consumed in 18 months. This velocity is the primary driver of the land valuation spike; the planning and zoning mechanisms of state governments cannot move at the speed of hyperscale capital deployment.

The market has reached a critical inflection point identified by M3 Property: for the first time on record, the volume of live data centre capacity taken up by users in 2023 and 2024 exceeded the amount of new supply brought to market.¹ This inversion, where consumption outstrips delivery, creates a structural deficit. In real estate economics, a structural deficit in a high-barrier-to-entry market inevitably leads to aggressive price discovery, validating the sharp uptick in land values observed in 2025.

The “AI-Native” Inflection: Density as the New Density

The 2025 M3 Property data highlights a qualitative shift in demand that is as important as the quantitative growth. The market is migrating from “Cloud-Native” (general storage/compute) to “AI-Native” workloads. Facilities designed specifically for hosting AI workloads have seen demand increase nearly 27 times in the last five years.⁷

This distinction is vital for valuation. AI workloads require significantly higher power density per rack (often >100kW per rack compared to the traditional 5-10kW).⁹ This changes the physical requirements of the land. A site that was suitable for a standard co-location facility five years ago may now be obsolete if it cannot support liquid cooling infrastructure and massive power draw.

The emergence of “NeoCloud” tenants, companies like OpenAI and Zoom, has introduced a new occupier profile. These tenants absorb capacity in blocks of 10 MW to 50 MW at short notice.⁷ They are capital-rich and time-poor. For these tenants, the cost of land is a negligible fraction of the total operation; the cost of delay is existential. Consequently, they effectively set the market price for power-ready land, driving it to levels that traditional logistics operators (who operate on thin margins) cannot match.

The Capital Tsunami: $26 Billion and the Supply Gap

The forward-looking data from M3 Property projects that Australia’s built-out capacity will expand from approximately 2,000 MW to 9,500 MW by the early 2030s.¹ Alternatively, deployable capacity is projected to more than double from 1,350 MW in 2024 to 3,100 MW by 2030.⁷ This massive expansion requires an estimated AUD 26 billion in investment.⁷

However, despite this wall of capital, M3 Property forecasts a supply gap of up to 1.7 GW.¹ This gap is the “value wedge.” It represents demand that is funded but unhoused. The existence of a 1.7 GW supply gap implies that any site capable of bridging this gap commands a scarcity premium. This is the fundamental economic engine driving the “Electron Valuation.” Investors are paying for the certainty of closing this gap.

Sovereign Moats and Essential Infrastructure

The valuation calculus is further distorted by geopolitical and regulatory factors. The Security of Critical Infrastructure Act has elevated data centres to the status of essential infrastructure.¹ Furthermore, data sovereignty requirements are forcing global hyperscalers to store Australian data on Australian soil.

This creates a “captive market.” Global tech giants cannot simply move to a cheaper jurisdiction if the land price in Sydney becomes too high; they are legally mandated to be here. This inelasticity of demand ensures that land valuations in key sovereign zones (like Canberra and secure zones in Sydney) are effectively uncapped, decoupled from the broader economic conditions that might depress standard industrial property values.

This section quantifies the “Two-Tier” land price to test the hypothesis of a fractured market. The analysis of transactions and market data in late 2025 confirms that the industrial market has split. We are no longer observing a single asset class; we are observing two distinct markets operating on the same geography but utilising different currencies: one trades in square metres, the other in megawatts.

Western Sydney: The Mamre Road Crucible

The Mamre Road precinct in Western Sydney is the “Ground Zero” of the Megawatt Fracture. Historically the engine room of Australian logistics, it has been transformed by the gravitational pull of digital infrastructure.

Tier 2: The Logistics Baseline

To establish the premium, we first establish the baseline. In the logistics sector, land value is derived from the residual land value method: the maximum a developer can pay while achieving a target yield on a warehouse lease.

• Historical Context: In 2020/2021, unserviced land in the precinct traded at ~$400/sqm, rising to ~$500/sqm by 2022.¹⁰
• 2025 Reality: By late 2025, while logistics values have appreciated, they face ceilings imposed by construction costs and softening consumer demand. Prime serviced industrial land for logistics use in Western Sydney is trading in the range of $1,000 – $1,200 per sqm.¹⁰ This represents the maximum economic rent a logistics developer can justify.

Tier 1: The Data Centre Premium

The data centre valuation completely ignores this logistics ceiling.

• The Microsoft Benchmark (2022): The fracture became visible as early as 2022 when Microsoft paid $935/sqm for a site at 769 Mamre Road.² At the time, comparable logistics sites were trading at ~$462/sqm.¹² This was a 100% premium paid two years prior to the current AI boom.
• The 2025 Surge: By late 2025, reports indicate that data centre operators are paying upwards of $1,400 per sqm for unserviced but power-capable sites in Sydney.³ In some instances, “unicorn” sites with immediate high-voltage access are commanding prices approaching $2,000/sqm, effectively double or triple the logistics baseline.
• The ISPT 1GW Valuation: The ISPT Mamre Road Data Centre Campus is the definitive “Power Shell” example. The project, valued at AUD 5 billion,¹³ spans 52 hectares. A standard logistics valuation for 52 hectares at $1,200/sqm would yield a land value of ~$624 million. Even with a $1 billion build cost for sheds, the remaining $3+ billion of value is attributed to the 1 GW power capacity. The market is valuing the electrons and the infrastructure (4 substations, 936 cooling units) far higher than the land itself.

Melbourne: The Spillover Effect and Truganina

The fracture is not confined to Sydney. Melbourne, specifically the Truganina precinct in the west, acts as the primary “spillover” market for demand that cannot be serviced in NSW due to grid constraints.

Tier 2: The Logistics Baseline

• Market Data: In Q1/Q2 2025, average industrial land values in Melbourne’s west (Truganina) were recorded at $857 per sqm for 1-5 hectare lots.¹¹ Larger lots (5ha+) traded at a discount, averaging $728 per sqm.¹¹
• Stagnation: Commentary from Cushman & Wakefield indicates that land values for traditional uses have “remained steady,” constrained by state taxes and construction costs.¹⁵

Tier 1: The Data Centre Premium

• Amazon’s Entry: Amazon acquired a 12-hectare site in northern Melbourne for $71.2 million, equating to nearly $600 per sqm.³ While this appears lower than Sydney, the report explicitly notes this was “double the usual rate” for that specific location at the time of purchase, confirming the 100% premium trend holds across geographies.
• The Truganina Record: A facility at 2B Dunmore Drive, Truganina, sold for $2,700/sqm of building area in late 2025.¹⁶ The agents explicitly cited “rising land rates” and the “replacement cost” driven by the sector’s heat. While this is a built-form rate, it sets a new psychological benchmark for the precinct, pulling land values upward in its wake.
• NextDC’s Land Banking: NextDC’s aggressive expansion, including the M2 and M4 sites in Melbourne,¹⁷ further restricts supply. Their acquisition strategy creates a “scarcity shadow,” where adjacent landowners inflate expectations, effectively sterilising land for lower-value logistics uses.

The “Power Shell” Asset Class

The divergence in valuation has birthed a new asset class: the “Power Shell.” This is distinct from a “Cold Shell” warehouse.

• Logistics Warehouse: Valued on cubic capacity (pallet positions), hardstand areas, and transport access.
• Power Shell: Valued on MVA (Megavolt-Amperes) capacity, diverse fibre pathing, and substation proximity.

The “Data Centre Premium” is essentially the capitalised value of the power connection. If a site has a confirmed 50MVA connection, the valuation model switches from $/sqm to $/MW. With data centre capital values averaging $15 million to $20 million per MW of installed capacity, the land component (even at $2,000/sqm) remains a fraction of the total project value (typically 5-10%). This affords data centre developers a payment capacity that is structurally out of reach for logistics developers, whose land cost creates a significant drag on yield.

Data Summary: The Two-Speed Market (2025)

The investigation confirms the hypothesis: unpowered logistics sites are being systematically devalued in relative terms. While their nominal price may hold, their opportunity cost has skyrocketed. A site without power is effectively “stranded” from the highest and best use class of the decade.

If demand is the engine and valuation is the speedometer, the electrical grid is the road, and in 2025, that road is gridlocked. This section maps the “Grid Strangulation” zones. The data reveals that the primary constraint on Australian data centre growth is no longer land, zoning, or capital, but the physical and regulatory capacity of the National Electricity Market (NEM).

The AEMO Connection Queue: A Regulatory Moat

The Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO) is currently managing a connection queue that has ballooned to unmanageable proportions. The sheer volume of connection inquiries confirms that the industry is attempting to secure power far in excess of what the grid can deliver.

• Victoria’s 18 GW Wall: In Victoria alone, AEMO’s Victorian Planning (AVP) function received over 18 GW of data centre connection inquiries in the 18 months leading to late 2025.⁴ To contextualise this figure, the average operational demand for the entire National Electricity Market (NEM), covering the east coast of Australia, is often around 22-25 GW. The data centre sector in Victoria effectively requested to duplicate the state’s entire generation capacity.
• NSW’s 10 GW Queue: Transgrid, the transmission network operator for NSW, reports receiving more than 10 GW of connection inquiries and 4 GW of formal applications.¹⁸ This is described as a “Deep Transition” phase, where the load from data centres will exceed the energy requirements of electric vehicles over the next decade.¹⁸
• The “Double” Forecast: AEMO has been forced to radically revise its forecasting methodology. The “Step Change” scenario now predicts data centre consumption will grow at 25% year-on-year, reaching 12 TWh by 2030 (6% of grid demand).¹⁹ This is a doubling of previous forecasts, an admission that the regulator consistently underestimated the velocity of the sector.

The Physics of Delay: Why Power Takes Years

The “Electron Valuation” thesis holds that time is money. A site with existing power is valuable because new power is years away. The research quantifies this delay.

• Connection Timelines: Surveyed renewable energy developers (a proxy for large-scale grid connections) report waiting 2 to 3 years just for connection approval.²¹
• Infrastructure Lead Times: The IEA notes that in global hubs, grid connection delays can range from two to ten years.²² Australia is trending toward the upper end of this spectrum due to supply chain constraints for transformers and high-voltage equipment.
• The Transmission Bottleneck: CEIG reports identify the transmission network as the major bottleneck, with projects facing average delays of around 2 years.²³ NSW experienced 66% of the total NEM congestion impact in 2024, meaning the grid is physically congested even before new loads are added.²³

The “Strangulation Zones”: Mapping the Constraint

The intersection of high demand and grid congestion creates specific geographic zones of exclusion.

Zone 1: Western Sydney (Critical Constraint)

Sydney remains the preferred location, hosting 63% of operating capacity.⁷ However, M3 Property notes that “land and power constraints in Sydney’s core zones” are forcing spillover.¹ The Mamre Road precinct is the epicentre of this strangulation. The immense load of projects like the ISPT 1GW campus and the Microsoft data centres places extreme pressure on the local transmission infrastructure (e.g., the Kemps Creek substation). AEMO and Transgrid are actively managing this by imposing stricter “gates” on new applications, effectively closing the door on speculative developers.

Zone 2: Melbourne (The Closing Relief Valve)

Melbourne is positioned to capture the spillover from Sydney, with its share of national capacity expected to rise to 30% by FY30.²⁰ The availability of transmission-connected sites in the west (Derrimut, Truganina) has been a key advantage. However, the 18 GW inquiry queue⁴ indicates that this relief valve is also becoming choked. The competition for capacity at key terminal stations (Brooklyn, Keilor, Thomastown) is intensifying, replicating the Sydney dynamic.

Zone 3: The Edge (Regional Hubs)

The constraint is pushing activity to the fringe. AEMO data shows minimal activity outside the major capitals,²⁰ but interest is growing in regions like South Australia and the ACT. However, latency issues limit the viability of these zones for AI training clusters compared to inference workloads.

The “Power Shell” as a Valuation Shelter

In a strangled grid, the “Power Shell” becomes a shelter for capital. Investors are not paying for the potential of power; they are paying for the rights to it.

This has led to a shift in Capital Expenditure (CapEx). Developers are investing heavily in “Front-of-Meter” infrastructure. The ISPT project includes up to four substations on-site.¹³ This internalisation of grid infrastructure allows developers to control their destiny to a greater degree, but it raises the entry barrier significantly. A logistics developer cannot justify building a substation; a data centre developer can. This creates a permanent divergence in the utility of the land.

This section examines the “Off-Grid” Bypass, the theory that developers could circumvent grid strangulation by generating their own power, thus decoupling land value from the grid connection queue. The investigation reveals that while technically possible, the “Off-Grid” data centre is a regulatory and financial minefield. It is a niche solution, not a systemic fix.

The Gas “Bridge”: Technical Feasibility vs. Reality

With grid connections delayed by years, developers are proposing on-site gas generation as a “bridge” or even a prime power solution.

• Cloud Carrier (Moss Vale): The Cloud Carrier (Square Energy) project in the Southern Highlands is a prime example. The developer proposes installing two gas generators (initially 30 MW) to power 16 data centre buildings.²⁴ The proposal markets a transition to “green hydrogen” and “bio-methane” via Jemena, but the immediate reality is fossil gas.²⁴
• Tamboran Resources: A more radical proposal involves using gas directly from the Beetaloo Basin to power a data centre in the Northern Territory, completely bypassing the national grid.²⁴
• The Logic: Gas turbines can be deployed faster than transmission lines. If a site has access to a gas pipeline but not a high-voltage power line, it theoretically unlocks “stranded” land.

The Regulatory Firewall: The NSW EPA

The NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) acts as the primary barrier to this strategy. The “Off-Grid” bypass runs headfirst into the state’s aggressive decarbonisation statutes.

• NOx Emissions Limits: The EPA enforces strict limits on Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) emissions for cogeneration and trigeneration. In Sydney and the Illawarra, the limit for natural gas engines is 250 mg/Nm3.⁶ Meeting this requires sophisticated and expensive Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) systems.²⁵ This destroys the cost advantage of cheap gas generation.
• Net Zero Friction: NSW has legislated targets of 50% emissions reduction by 2030 and Net Zero by 2050.²⁶ The EPA’s Climate Change Policy explicitly targets licensed industries for decarbonisation. Approving a massive new point-source of carbon emissions (a gas-fired data centre) contradicts the state’s trajectory.
• Firming Regulations: Under the NSW Electricity Infrastructure Roadmap, “firming infrastructure” (which these gas plants would be classified as) faces strict emissions intensity obligations. Before 2036, their intensity must be lower than the grid average; after 2036, they must achieve Net Zero for Scope 1 emissions.²⁷ This effectively puts an expiration date on any gas-fired solution, forcing a transition to hydrogen or offsets that may not be economically viable.

The CDC Precedent: The Price of Approval

The approval of the CDC Marsden Park hyperscale campus ($3.1 billion) serves as the bellwether for government policy.

• The Approval: The project was approved as State Significant Development.⁵
• The Condition: Crucially, the approval is tied to a commitment to source 99% of energy from renewables by 2030.⁵
• Implication: The government will approve massive data centres, but only if they align with the renewable grid. The “Off-Grid” gas solution is not a loophole; it is a temporary concession at best. CDC is using grid power and offsets, not a permanent islanded gas plant. This precedent suggests that pure “off-grid gas” valuations are risky, as they rely on regulatory approvals that are increasingly unlikely to be granted for greenfield sites.

The “Self-Firming” Hybrid: The Supernode

A more viable “Bypass” is the integration of Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) to create a “Self-Firming” asset.

• Quinbrook Supernode: Located in Brendale (Queensland), this project combines a hyperscale data centre with a 780 MW battery storage system.²⁹
• Valuation Impact: This approach internalises the reliability cost. By co-locating storage, the site reduces its peak draw on the grid and can arbitrage energy prices. This effectively increases the value of the land by reducing the “grid burden.” This model, Grid + Battery, is the likely future of the “Power Shell,” rather than the “Gas Island.”

The structural decoupling of land value has triggered massive corporate manoeuvres. The major players are not just observing the fracture; they are actively widening it to secure dominance.

The Blackstone / AirTrunk Validation

The acquisition of AirTrunk by Blackstone for AUD 24 billion in late 2024/2025³⁰ is the definitive market validation of the “Megawatt Valuation.”

• Valuation Uplift: AirTrunk was valued at just $3 billion in 2020. An 8x valuation uplift in four years is unprecedented in traditional real estate.
• The Asset: Blackstone did not buy AirTrunk for its land; they bought it for its platform and its pipeline of secured power (including the massive Western Sydney campus³²). This transaction confirms that capital is chasing “execution capability” and “grid access” above all else.

Goodman Group: The Pivot to Power

Goodman Group (ASX: GMG), traditionally the global leader in logistics real estate, has executed a strategic pivot that aligns perfectly with the “Electron Valuation” hypothesis.

• WIP Transformation: Data centres now account for 57% of Goodman’s development Work In Progress (WIP), valued at $12.9 billion.³³
• The “Power Bank”: Goodman has coined the term “Global Power Bank,” securing 5.0 GW of power across its global portfolio.³³ This signals a fundamental shift in how the company measures its inventory: not in square metres, but in gigawatts.
• Strategy: Goodman is converting its existing industrial land bank into a power bank. By upgrading power infrastructure on logistics sites, they are effectively re-zoning their own assets from Tier 2 to Tier 1, capturing the valuation arbitrage internally.

NextDC: The Capital Arms Race

NextDC (ASX: NXT) illustrates the capital intensity required to play in this Tier 1 market.

• Capital Raising: NextDC launched a $1.3 billion capital raising to fund its expansion.³⁵
• Acquisition Cost: The company entered an agreement to purchase the S7 site in Western Sydney for approximately AUD 353 million.³⁶ This acquisition, for a potential 550MW capacity, highlights the immense cost of entry. The land price is a barrier to entry that protects incumbents.
• Land Banking: NextDC is aggressively land banking in Sydney (S4, S5, S7) and Melbourne (M2, M4) to secure a runway for the next decade.³⁷ They are buying land today to secure the power of tomorrow.

The investigation concludes that the “Megawatt Fracture” is real, structural, and accelerating. The “Electron Valuation” hypothesis is validated.

The New Valuation Hierarchy

The industrial market has effectively split into three distinct asset classes:

1. Tier 1: The Power Shell (Data Centre Approved): Valued on $/MW. Characterised by secured high-voltage connection, proximity to transmission, and AI-native design. Values are 40-100% higher than adjacent logistics land.
2. Tier 2: Prime Logistics (Serviced): Valued on $/sqm (Yield). Characterised by motorway access (M4/M7) and standard 11kV power. Values are capped by logistics rent ceilings.
3. Tier 3: Stranded Assets (Unpowered): Land that is zoned industrial but lacks both transport proximity and power capacity. These assets face significant devaluation risk as they are bypassed by both logistics and digital capital.

The “300% Premium” Validated

While market averages show a 40-100% premium, specific transactions validate the “300% premium” claim that prompted this investigation.

• Baseline: Logistics land at ~$1,000/sqm.
• Peak Transactions: Data centre “unicorn” sites trading at ~$2,700/sqm (built) or implied land values of >$2,000/sqm.
• Conclusion: The premium is dynamic. It scales with the immediacy of the power. A site with power today commands the 300% premium. A site with power in 5 years commands a lower premium.

Risk Assessment

• The “Speculative” Trap: Buying unpowered land with the hope of converting it to data centre use is a high-risk strategy. AEMO’s connection queue is a “regulatory moat” that prevents easy conversion. Without a secured connection agreement, land is just dirt.
• The “Off-Grid” Trap: Relying on gas generation to bypass the grid is fraught with regulatory risk. The NSW EPA and Net Zero legislation create a closing window for fossil-fuelled data centres.

Final Recommendation:

Investment strategy must pivot from “Land Banking” to “Power Banking.” The metric of success for the next decade of industrial real estate will not be the size of the land holding, but the capacity of the substation it connects to. The fracture is permanent; the market has moved to an electron-based standard.

Table: The Megawatt Fracture Matrix (2025)

1. Australia’s data centre sector expands fortyfold in the past 20 years – M3 Property, accessed December 2025.
2. Microsoft Pays Top Dollar for Kemps Creek Data Centre Land | Property News, accessed December 2025.
3. Data Centre Demand Drives Land Price Surge – The Aussie Corporate, accessed December 2025.
4. Victorian Annual Planning Report – Australian Energy Market Operator, accessed December 2025.
5. NSW approves southern hemisphere’s largest data centre …, accessed December 2025.
6. Reducing cogeneration and trigeneration emissions | EPA – NSW Environment Protection Authority, accessed December 2025.
7. DATA CENTRE GROWTH IN AUSTRALIA – M3 Property, accessed December 2025.
8. Australia’s data centre sector expands fortyfold in the past 20 years – M3 Property, accessed December 2025.
9. Data Centre One in Moss Vale | Cloud Carrier (15 MW), accessed December 2025.
10. Re: Mamre Road Precinct – Economic Viability Queries – IPART – NSW Government, accessed December 2025.
11. melbourne – logistics & industrial q2 2025 – Marketbeat Template – Local Markets, accessed December 2025.
12. ESR Settles on Westlink Land – Australian Property Markets News, accessed December 2025.
13. Mamre Road Data Centre 4 in Sydney | ISPT, accessed December 2025.
14. Mamre Road Data Centre Campus in Sydney | ISPT (600 MW), accessed December 2025.
15. melbourne – logistics & industrial q1 2025 – Cushman & Wakefield, accessed December 2025.
16. Sale price represents record per square metre rate in Truganina | CBRE Australia, accessed December 2025.
17. High energy and always on: Powering the data centre boom …, accessed December 2025.
18. Beyond the Transition: Powering the Next Wave of REZs – Transgrid, accessed December 2025.
19. AEMO doubles data centre demand forecast – The Energy, accessed December 2025.
20. DATA CENTRE ENERGY DEMAND, accessed December 2025.
21. Australia grid delays pose risk to renewable energy targets – PV Magazine, accessed December 2025.
22. Overcoming energy constraints is key to delivering on Europe’s data centre goals – IEA, accessed December 2025.
23. Transmission Bottleneck Analysis – Clean Energy Investor Group, accessed December 2025.
24. Australian developer proposes gas turbines rather than renewables to power data centres, accessed December 2025.
25. Green Square Corporate Office Park ACAA Technical Paper 2010 – Australian Construction Achievement Award, accessed December 2025.
26. EPA Climate Change Policy – NSW Environment Protection Authority, accessed December 2025.
27. Overseeing firming infrastructure’s greenhouse gas emissions obligations | EPA, accessed December 2025.
28. Southern Hemisphere’s Largest Data Centre Approved – Mirage News, accessed December 2025.
29. Supernode – Quinbrook, accessed December 2025.
30. M2 to AirTrunk: The changing and unchanging nature of infrastructure, accessed December 2025.
31. How the changing data centre boom is challenging asset owners – Investment Magazine, accessed December 2025.
32. AirTrunk named as buyer of ISPT’s 1GW Western Sydney site – W.Media, accessed December 2025.
33. Annual Report 2025 – Goodman Group, accessed December 2025.
34. fy25-full-year-results-presentation.pdf – Goodman Group, accessed December 2025.
35. NEXTDC launches $1.3b capital raising to fund development of Australian data centres, accessed December 2025.
36. NEXTDC Announces Massive Expansion Plans with Acquisition of S7 Data Centre Site in Sydney, accessed December 2025.
37. Results for announcement to the market – NEXTDC, accessed December 2025.