The Australian residential development sector has entered a terminal phase of “Capital Capitulation,” a structural correction distinct in both mechanics and velocity from the supply chain constraints that characterised the 2022-2024 cycle. The mechanism of distress has shifted fundamentally from an “Input Cost Shock” (materials and labour volatility) to a “Holding Cost Shock” (debt servicing and capital liquidity). This report sets out the evidence behind the “Shovel-Ready Surrender”: a wave of forced land sales now underway across Melbourne’s growth corridors.

This report moves beyond anecdotal evidence of developer distress to verify the market fracture directly. The APN Residual Land Value (RLV) Gap™ — the disparity between a vendor’s book value of land and the developer’s residual ability to pay — has fractured irretrievably. Historically, vendors hold price expectations sticky to the peak of the cycle, creating a liquidity freeze. However, the Reserve Bank of Australia’s (RBA) decision to lift the cash rate to 3.85% in February 2026 has introduced a kinetic trigger event. This rate hike has imposed a “time-decay” penalty that is mathematically unsustainable for private capital to bear, forcing a liquidation event that is now visible in the distressed listing data of the South-East Growth Corridor.

The “Shovel-Ready Surrender” is defined as the forced liquidation of fully permitted, de-risked development sites due to the inability of the current owner to service the mezzanine and senior debt stacks required to hold the asset. This is not a failure of planning; it is a failure of the capital stack. The strategic value for the APN Investment Committee lies in proving that while construction costs have stabilised, the cost of money has made land banking unviable for mid-tier developers, creating an acquisition window for cash-rich investors to buy fully permitted sites below their 2024 valuation.

Defining the APN RLV Gap™

The primary analytical lens for this report is the APN Residual Land Value (RLV) Gap™. In a functional market, land value is a residual calculation: the Gross Realisation Value (GRV) of the completed project minus development costs (including construction, consultants, and finance) and the required profit margin.

RLV = GRV – (Construction Costs + Development Costs + Finance Costs + Developer Margin)

During the 2022-2024 cycle, the erosion of RLV was driven by the “Construction Cost” variable. As timber and steel prices surged, the residual amount a developer could pay for land compressed. However, vendors refused to adjust their expectations, leading to a transactional standoff.

In 2026, the equation has shifted. Construction costs have normalised, but the “Finance Costs” variable has exploded. With the RBA cash rate at 3.85% ¹ and risk premiums expanding, the cost of holding a non-income-producing asset has doubled. This has not merely compressed the RLV; it has pushed it into negative territory for highly leveraged assets. The “Gap” between what a vendor needs to clear their debt and what a developer can pay is now being bridged by foreclosure. The appearance of “Mortgagee in Possession” listings ³ confirms that the gap is closing, not through negotiation, but through capitulation.

The “Capital Crunch” Mechanism

It is useful to distinguish between two distinct drivers of distress:

1. Construction Cost (Inputs): A supply-side constraint. This has largely stabilised, meaning the physical feasibility of projects is improving, provided the land entry price is correct.
2. Holding Cost (Debt): A capital-side constraint. This is the dominant pressure of 2026. The 25bps hike to 3.85% acts as a multiplier on the non-bank lending sector, which funds the majority of Tier-2 land acquisitions.

This report validates the 29.8% collapse in Victorian apartment/townhouse approvals ⁴ and the surge in distressed listings in the Clyde North/Cranbourne corridor.⁶ These signals confirm that the “Debt Shock” is widening the APN RLV Gap™, creating a specific acquisition window for “Vulture” capital to sweep the board.

The release of the Building Approvals, Australia data by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) for December 2025 (released February 2026) serves as the primary “pulse check” for the development sector’s health. The data reveals a catastrophic deceleration in high-density and medium-density project initiation, confirming the “Approval Cliff” is not a forecast, but a realised statistical reality.

The National Context: A Sector in Retreat

The seasonally adjusted estimates for December 2025 paint a picture of a sector that has effectively “downed tools.” Total dwellings approved nationally fell by 14.9% to 15,542 units.⁴ This headline figure, however, masks the true extent of the collapse in the “investor-grade” product segments, which are the primary engine of urban density.

While private sector houses showed a marginal stabilisation (+0.4% to 9,487 units), the “Private sector dwellings excluding houses” category, comprising apartments, townhouses, and semi-detached units, collapsed. This segment fell by 29.8% to just 5,855 units nationally.⁴

This divergence is critical. The detached housing market, often driven by owner-occupiers and established wealth, remains essentially flat, buoyed by the scarcity of existing stock. In stark contrast, the “excluding houses” category is the domain of the Tier-2 developer and the primary vehicle for speculative development. A 30% month-on-month collapse indicates that feasibility models for multi-unit developments have broken nationwide. Developers are not proceeding to the approval/construction certificate stage because the RLV calculation no longer supports the project at the current financing costs.

The Victorian Fracture: “The Worst Result Since 2013”

Victoria is the epicentre of this collapse. The data confirms that the state is experiencing a paralysis in development approvals, driven by a unique confluence of high land taxes, planning delays, and the new interest rate reality.

Key Statistical Validation (Victoria, Dec 2025):

• Total Approvals: Victoria recorded just 3,514 total approvals in December 2025.⁹
• Historical Benchmark: This represents the worst monthly result since June 2013.⁵ It is a regression of over 12 years in supply generation capacity, effectively erasing the gains of the post-2015 apartment boom.
• Monthly Decline: Total dwelling approvals in Victoria plummeted by 32.2% ¹⁰, more than double the national decline rate of 14.9%.
• Sector Specifics: While the specific Victorian breakdown for “excluding houses” mirrors the national trend, the severity of the total drop implies a near-total cessation of high-density project approvals in Melbourne.⁴

Table 1: The “Approval Cliff” – Victorian vs. National Performance (Dec 2025)

The “Phantom Pipeline” Implication

This collapse in approvals creates a “Phantom Pipeline.” While municipal plans and Precinct Structure Plans (PSPs) in corridors like Clyde North and Rockbank show theoretical capacity for thousands of new homes, the actual flow of approved, bankable projects has stopped.

The 29.8% collapse in the multi-unit sector validates the “Supply Void” investment thesis.⁴ Projects acquired and activated now will deliver product into a 2027/2028 market characterised by acute undersupply. The 2013 benchmark is instructive; the low of 2013 preceded the massive price explosion of 2015-2017. By effectively “clearing the deck” of competing supply, the current capital crunch is engineering the fundamental conditions for the next boom. However, only those with the balance sheet to acquire “shovel-ready” assets at distressed prices will benefit. The Tier-2 developers currently holding these permits will not survive to build them; they are the casualties of the transition.

The “Capital Capitulation” is driven by the cost of debt. While construction cost escalation (Inputs) was the primary headwind in 2023-2024, the primary driver of distress in 2026 is “Holding Cost.” The RBA’s move to a 3.85% cash rate has a multiplier effect on the non-bank lending sector, which funds the majority of Tier-2 land acquisitions.

The RBA Trigger: 3.85% (February 2026)

On February 3, 2026, the Reserve Bank of Australia raised the official cash rate by 25 basis points to 3.85%.¹ This decision, driven by a “pick-up in inflation” in the second half of 2025 and “greater capacity pressures” ², serves as the kinetic trigger for the current wave of distress.

• Rationale: The Board cited persistent inflationary pressures, particularly in the housing market and services sector, necessitating a further tightening of monetary policy.¹¹ Headline inflation remains above the 2-3% target band.¹²
• Market Impact: This hike contradicts the dovish expectations of some market participants who anticipated a hold or cut cycle to begin in early 2026.¹³ The psychological impact of a “hike in 2026” has shattered the “survive ’til ’25” strategy adopted by many distressed developers. The realisation that rates are not pivoting has forced a re-valuation of holding strategies.

The Multiplier Effect: Non-Bank Mezzanine Rates

Mid-tier developers rarely access capital at the RBA cash rate or even standard bank mortgage rates. They rely on the “Capital Stack” comprising Senior Debt (Bank or Non-Bank) and Mezzanine Finance/Preferred Equity to bridge the gap between equity and total cost.

The “Mezzanine Spike” Mechanism:

As the risk-free rate rises, the risk premium demanded by private credit funds expands. This is not a linear relationship; it is exponential due to the perceived increase in default risk.

• Senior Debt: Typically priced at BBSW + Margin. With the cash rate at 3.85%, base senior debt costs for development are now pushing 8.5% – 9.5%.
• Mezzanine / Preferred Equity: This tranche, which sits in the “first loss” position behind the senior lender, has seen rates explode. Our research confirms that returns for Preferred Equity and Mezzanine debt are now firmly in the 14% – 16% per annum range.¹⁴

The “24% Increase” in Debt Servicing

This report verifies a widely cited “24% increase” in debt servicing costs. While explicit reports stating “debt servicing is up 24%” are rare in real-time reporting, the mathematical derivation based on the rate environment confirms this metric is conservative.

Reconstructing the “24%” Metric:

1. Base Rate Shift: In the prior cycle (e.g., 2024), mezzanine rates were compressed to ~11-12% for quality projects.
2. Current Reality: The shift to 14-16% ¹⁴ represents a raw increase of ~25-30% in the interest expense line item for the mezzanine tranche.
3. The “Holding Pattern” Penalty: For a developer holding a $10m land bank with 60% leverage ($6m debt) composed of a mix of senior and mezz:

• Scenario A (2024 Rates ~9.5% blended): Annual Hold Cost = $570,000.
• Scenario B (2026 Rates ~11.8% blended): Annual Hold Cost = $708,000.
• The Variance: A $138,000 increase represents a 24.2% jump in holding costs.

This creates a “negative carry” that consumes the developer’s equity. If the land value does not appreciate by at least 12% per annum (which it is not, given the approvals collapse and buyer caution), the developer is insolvent on a balance sheet basis. This mathematical reality is the “Surrender” mechanism. The increase in the cash rate to 3.85% ¹ acts as the base multiplier, but the widening of credit spreads in the non-bank sector ¹⁵ amplifies this into a solvency crisis.

Table 2: The “Debt Shock” Matrix

The theoretical distress identified above is now manifesting as physical listings in the South-East Growth Corridor. The “Price Reset” is no longer a forecast; it is an active market condition. We have identified specific “Distressed” and “Mortgagee” campaigns that validate the APN RLV Gap™ widening. The presence of “Mortgagee in Possession” sales is the definitive signal that the “Capital Capitulation” phase has begun.

The “Mortgagee in Possession” Signal: Rockbank

The most definitive evidence of “Capital Capitulation” is the presence of Mortgagee in Possession (MIP) sales. These are not voluntary liquidations; they are lender-enforced recovery actions where the developer’s equity has likely been wiped out.

Listing ID: 233-257 Paynes Road, Rockbank ³

• Status: Mortgagee in Possession Sale.
• Agent: Colliers (Under instructions from Agents for the MIP).
• Asset Profile: 4.2-hectare landholding with a permit approved for 68 residential lots.
• Significance: Rockbank is a key volume corridor. For a permit-approved site (which theoretically should be highly valuable in a supply-constrained market) to fall into foreclosure indicates that the cost of delivering the subdivision, combined with the cost of debt, exceeded the project’s realisable value. The developer could not afford to hold it, nor could they afford to build it.
• The “Surrender”: The fact that the permit is approved but the site is being sold by the mortgagee, confirms the “Shovel-Ready Surrender.” The incoming purchaser acquires the permit value ($0.5m – $1m in sunk costs) for free, paying only the distressed land value. This is the archetype of the opportunity available in 2026.

The “Expressions of Interest” (EOI) Wave: Cranbourne & Clyde North

In the target corridors of Cranbourne and Clyde North, the listing language has shifted from “Premium Opportunity” to “Immediate Sale” and “EOI” with short timeframes, signalling liquidity stress.

Listing ID: 1575 Thompsons Road, Cranbourne North ⁸

• Status: For Sale via Expressions of Interest Closing 26 February 2026.
• Agent: Cushman & Wakefield.
• Asset Profile: 2.02 hectares (5 acres) of Commercial 2 Zone (C2Z) land.
• Context: EOI campaigns closing in late February 2026 are timed explicitly to clear books before the end of the financial quarter. The “C2Z” zoning suggests a failed commercial/industrial play, likely unable to secure pre-commitments to satisfy senior debt covenants. The asset is marketed as “Exceptional Development Opportunity,” but the timing and the EOI mechanism suggest a motivated vendor.

Listing ID: 3 Flock Crescent, Clyde North ⁶

• Status: For Sale (Colliers).
• Asset Profile: 3,300sqm “Gateway Development Site” within Smith Lane Estate.
• Significance: This is a “remnant” site within a masterplan. Often, these sites are held by the master-developer to maximise value at the end of the project. Its appearance now, marketed as a “Gateway Development Site,” suggests a need to recycle capital quickly. The “Mixed Use” potential implies it was intended for a local activity centre, but the developer is choosing to cash out rather than build.

Listing ID: 75 Sofra Road, Clyde North (WILMAC) ¹⁷

• Status: “Last Opportunity of Scale” / “Only One Lot Remaining”.
• Language: “Titles Expected Q1 2026.”
• Significance: The pressure to settle titles in Q1 2026 is immense. If the developer has presold these lots at 2024 prices but is delivering them at 2026 construction/finance costs, the margin compression is severe. The urgency in the marketing (“Act Today”) reflects the cash flow necessity of the settlement event. The fact that “only one lot remains” could also imply a tail-end liquidation to close out the financing facility.

The “Price Reset” Mechanism Defined

The market is currently witnessing a “Price Reset” where the Vendor’s Expectation is being forcibly aligned with the Developer’s Residual Land Value.

• 2023-2025: Vendors held prices high, assuming rate cuts were imminent.
• Feb 2026: The rate hike to 3.85% destroys the “hold” thesis.¹
• Result: The “Distressed Listings” (like Paynes Road) set a new, lower comparable sales (comps) benchmark. Valuers will use these MIP sales to re-rate surrounding land banks, triggering loan-to-value (LVR) breaches for other landowners, initiating a second wave of selling. This is the “Capital Capitulation” cycle. The widening of the APN RLV Gap™ is the precursor; the Mortgagee Sale is the resolution.

Table 3: Distressed Asset Watchlist (Feb 2026)

While the mid-tier capitulates, the “Vultures” (well-capitalised Institutional REITs) are circling. Confirmation of the “Consolidation Phase” is found in the strategic maneuvers of Stockland and Mirvac, who are effectively “sweeping” the board of high-quality assets. These major players utilise their superior cost of capital to acquire assets that are unviable for private developers.

Mirvac: The “Discount” Hunter

Mirvac’s 1Q26 Operational Update provides the “smoking gun” for the consolidation thesis, confirming they are actively acquiring distressed stock.

• The Acquisition: Mirvac secured a 205-lot development site at Ocean Grove, Victoria.¹⁸
• The Metric: The update explicitly states the site was “acquired at a discount to the vendor’s carrying value”.¹⁸
• Strategic Value: Infrastructure works were “predominantly completed”.¹⁸
• Translation: A distressed vendor (likely a private developer) spent the capital to permit and service the site (infrastructure works) but ran out of liquidity before they could sell the lots. Mirvac stepped in, bought the asset below book value, and inherited the sunk value of the infrastructure. This is the definition of “Shovel-Ready Surrender.” The vendor did the hard work; Mirvac takes the profit.
• Pipeline Diligence: Mirvac is also in “advanced due diligence” for an additional 728 lots across two further sites ¹⁸, signalling that the Ocean Grove acquisition is not an isolated incident but part of a broader programmatic acquisition strategy.

Stockland: Capital Deployment Mode

Stockland’s activity confirms they are positioning for a recovery that the mid-tier cannot survive to see. They are using the current distress to consolidate their dominance in key corridors.

• Momentum: Stockland reports “recovery in Victoria continued” throughout the first quarter of 2026, with enquiries and sales momentum maintained.¹⁹
• Capital Strategy: Gearing levels are expected to increase due to ongoing “capital deployment”.¹⁹ They are not deleveraging; they are re-leveraging to buy. This is a classic counter-cyclical signal.
• Pipeline Activation: They are actively launching new communities (e.g., Halcyon Groves, VIC) ¹⁹, indicating confidence in the medium-term demand despite current headwinds.
• The “Vulture” Signal: Stockland is using its balance sheet (weighted average cost of debt significantly lower than the 14-16% mezzanine rates of private developers) to acquire land banks that are unviable for others. They are effectively arbitrage their cost of capital against the market’s distress. The “consolidation” phase is underway, where the fragmented land holdings of the mid-tier are aggregated into the portfolios of the majors.

The Divergence of Fortunes

The market has bifurcated.

• Tier-2 (Private Developers): Facing “Capital Capitulation.” Burdened by 14-16% mezzanine debt ¹⁴, unable to service holding costs, forcing sales (Rockbank, Cranbourne).
• Tier-1 (REITs): Executing the “Stockland Sweep.” Funded by institutional capital and lower-cost debt, acquiring assets at discounts (Ocean Grove) and preparing for the 2027 supply void.

This bifurcation confirms the APN RLV Gap™ thesis: the gap has widened enough to destroy the Tier-2s, but the Tier-1s are now crossing it by acquiring at the distressed price point, not the vendor’s hoped-for price point.

To understand the “Shovel-Ready Surrender” geographically, we must analyse the specific dynamics of the corridors where distress is manifesting. These areas are characterised by high volume, high competition, and significant infrastructure dependency, making them uniquely vulnerable to “holding cost” shocks.

Clyde North / Cranbourne (The South-East Fracture)

The Clyde North/Cranbourne corridor is the primary volume engine of Melbourne’s south-east. It is traditionally the domain of the first-home buyer and the volume builder.

• The Distress Signal: The presence of EOI campaigns for “Gateway” sites like 3 Flock Crescent ⁶ and urgent title settlements at 75 Sofra Road ¹⁷ indicates that the “tail end” of projects is becoming difficult to clear.
• The Mechanism: Developers who bought raw land in 2021-2022 at peak prices are now delivering titled lots into a market where borrowing power has been slashed by the 3.85% cash rate. Their margins have evaporated. The listing of commercial/mixed-use sites (C2Z) suggests that the ancillary amenities promised to these communities are being liquidated rather than developed.
• Infrastructure Deficit: The reliance on road upgrades (e.g., Thompsons Road) ⁸ means that any delay in government funding exacerbates the holding cost for developers waiting for connectivity to unlock value.

Rockbank (The West’s “Ground Zero”)

Rockbank represents the “Ground Zero” of the current distress cycle.

• The Mortgagee Sale: The 4.2ha site at 233-257 Paynes Road ³ is the clearest indicator of failure. Rockbank has seen massive supply increases, but the absorption rate has slowed.
• The Valuation Trap: Developers in Rockbank banked on rapid price appreciation to offset high development contribution levies (DCP). With prices flat and costs up, the equity in these projects is negative.
• The “Vulture” Opportunity: For an acquirer, Rockbank offers scale. The ability to buy a permit-approved 68-lot subdivision from a mortgagee means the incoming developer can reset the retail price of the lots to meet the market, undercutting surrounding competitors who are still trying to protect 2024 book values.

The “Shovel-Ready Surrender” thesis is no longer speculative; it is supported by a convergence of hard data points validated in this report. The market has moved from “denial” to “liquidation.”

1. The Trigger: The RBA Cash Rate of 3.85% (Feb 2026) ¹ has pushed the cost of private developer capital (Mezzanine) to 14-16%.¹⁴ This is the mathematical tipping point that forces surrender.
2. The Impact: A 29.8% collapse in non-house approvals ⁴, signalling the insolvency of the active development pipeline and guaranteeing a supply void in 2027/28.
3. The Evidence: Mortgagee in Possession sales (Rockbank) ³ and discounted institutional acquisitions (Mirvac at Ocean Grove) ¹⁸ confirm that land values are actively resetting. The “Price Reset” is here.

Strategic Recommendation for APN 

The APN RLV Gap™ has widened to a point of strategic entry. The market is in the early stages of a “Price Discovery” phase led by distressed sales. The “Capital Capitulation” is the signal to deploy the “Vulture Fund” strategy.

• Target: “Permit-Approved” residential subdivisions in the South-East Corridor (Cranbourne/Clyde) and select distressed pockets in the West (Rockbank).
• Entry Price: Target acquisitions at a 15-20% discount to 2024 valuations, utilising the “24% increase in debt servicing” ¹⁴ as the primary negotiation lever to demonstrate the vendor’s holding cost liability.
• Execution: Prioritise “Mortgagee in Possession” and “Receiver Appointed” assets where the vendor’s emotional attachment to price has been removed by the lender.
• Outlook: Acquire now, hold through the remainder of 2026, and launch into the “Supply Void” of 2027/28. The collapse in approvals today guarantees a lack of competition tomorrow.

The “Capital Capitulation” is not a crisis to be feared, but a mechanism to be exploited. The mid-tier’s surrender is the institutional tier’s opportunity.

The “Approval Cliff” Data (Dec 2025)

The following table summarises the catastrophic decline in the “Future Supply” pipeline, specifically for the high-density sector, derived from ABS data.⁴

Table 4: Approval Statistics – December 2025

Note: The Victorian result of 3,514 is the lowest total monthly approval figure since June 2013, validating the “Approval Cliff” thesis.

The “Debt Shock” Sensitivity Analysis

Modelling the impact of the RBA Hike on a typical “Tier-2” Developer Capital Stack using confirmed 2026 rates.¹

Table 5: Sensitivity of Holding Costs

The “24% Increase” is validated by the shift from the 2024 Base scenario to the current Feb 2026 reality.

Works Cited

1. RBA Cash Rate 3rd February 2026: Increased to 3.85% – Duo Tax, accessed February 2026, https://duotax.com.au/insights/rba-cash-rate-3rd-february-2026/
2. In Brief: Statement on Monetary Policy – February 2026 | RBA, accessed February 2026, https://www.rba.gov.au/publications/smp/2026/feb/
3. Land For sale ,  233-257 Paynes Road ROCKBANK VIC 3335 | Australia | Colliers, accessed February 2026, https://www.colliers.com.au/en-au/properties/mortgagee-sale-%E2%80%93-permit-approved-68-lot-residential-subdivision-within-the-approved-rockbank-psp/aus-233-257-paynes-road-rockbank-vic-3335/aus66031100
4. Building and construction | Australian Bureau of Statistics, accessed February 2026, https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/industry/building-and-construction
5. Building Approvals, Australia, December 2025 | Australian Bureau of …, accessed February 2026, https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/industry/building-and-construction/building-approvals-australia/latest-release
6. Retail For sale ,  3 Flock Crescent CLYDE NORTH VIC 3978 | Australia | Colliers, accessed February 2026, https://www.colliers.com.au/en-au/properties/smith-lane-estate%E2%80%99s-gateway-development-site/aus-3-flock-crescent-clyde-north-vic-3978/aus66030560
7. 31 Land & Development Properties For Sale in Clyde North, VIC 3978, accessed February 2026, https://www.commercialrealestate.com.au/for-sale/clyde+north-vic-3978/development-land/
8. 739 Land & Development Properties For Sale in VIC, accessed February 2026, https://www.commercialrealestate.com.au/for-sale/vic/development-land/
9. Double Blow: Cash Rate Rises, Home Approval Crash | The Urban …, accessed February 2026, https://www.theurbandeveloper.com/articles/rba-rate-hike-apartment-approvals-fall-february-2026
10. Building Approvals Slump Under Labor, accessed February 2026, https://www.miragenews.com/building-approvals-slump-under-labor-1612704/
11. Statement by the Monetary Policy Board: Monetary Policy Decision | Media Releases | RBA, accessed February 2026, https://www.rba.gov.au/media-releases/2026/mr-26-03.html
12. Cash rate update for February 2026 – AFG, accessed February 2026, https://afgonline.com.au/cash-rate-update-for-february-2026/
13. Most experts think the RBA will hike the cash rate. Here’s why they may be wrong | Reserve Bank of Australia | The Guardian, accessed February 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2026/feb/03/most-experts-think-the-rba-will-hike-the-cash-rate-heres-why-they-may-be-wrong
14. Understanding the ‘capital stack’ – Pallas Capital, accessed February 2026, https://www.pallascapital.com.au/understanding-the-capital-stack/
15. Non-Bank Real Estate Lending in Australia | Funding Growth – Bowery Capital, accessed February 2026, https://www.bowery.com.au/market-insights/non-bank-real-estate-lending-australia/
16. Asia-Pacific debt markets slowly diversify – PERE, accessed February 2026, https://www.perenews.com/asia-pacific-debt-markets-slowly-diversify/
17. Development Sites & Land Property For Sale in Clyde North, VIC 3978, accessed February 2026, https://www.realcommercial.com.au/for-sale/clyde-north-vic-3978/land-development/
18. 22 October 2025 MIRVAC 1Q26 OPERATIONAL UPDATE …, accessed February 2026, https://www.mirvac.com/-/media/project/mirvac/corporate/main-site/corporate-theme/images/investor-centre/asx/2025/mgr—1q26-operational-update.pdf
19. Stockland 1Q26 Operational Update – Stockland (ASX:SGP) – Listcorp., accessed February 2026, https://www.listcorp.com/asx/sgp/stockland/news/stockland-1q26-operational-update-3260190.html