This exhaustive research report executes a rigorous forensic interrogation of the "Land-Use War" thesis, a strategic framework positing that the convergence of high-velocity Data Centre demand, specifically propelled by Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Cloud computing trajectories, and the entrenched requirements of E-Commerce logistics, is creating a phenomenon of "Functional Scarcity" within the Australian industrial landscape. This scarcity is distinct from a simple gross reduction in land supply; it represents a fundamental functional mismatch where the utility of available land no longer meets the specialised "High-Power" requirements of the modern industrial occupier.

This analysis tests the specific forecast of a 3.6% Vacancy Peak in the Brisbane market and examines the structural rigidity imposed by the "Replacement Cost" barrier. The core hypothesis suggests that "Replacement Cost" has structurally exceeded "Market Value," effectively creating a negative APN Residual Land Value (RLV) Gap™. This financial inversion is theorised to have halted new speculative supply in the sub-2,000-square-metre asset class, thereby locking in a supply shortage that is immune to standard cyclical corrections.

Furthermore, this report examines infrastructure uplift through a digital/power lens. Traditionally, infrastructure uplift has been tracked via transport connectivity (road, rail, port). The current market dynamics, however, suggest a paradigm shift where "Power Capacity", specifically the availability of 11kV+ connections, has superseded transport access as the primary driver of asset re-rating. This report distinguishes between "Hyperscale" (10ha+) demand, which drives displacement to outer rings, and "Edge" (Infill) demand, which cannibalises the critical 500sqm–2,000sqm last-mile logistics nodes.

To understand the specific dynamics of the Brisbane industrial market, one must first situate it within the broader macro-strategic context of the Australian real estate sector in 2026. The "Land-Use War" is not occurring in a vacuum; it is the inevitable collision of three macroeconomic super-cycles: the digitisation of the economy (AI/Data Centres), the restructuring of global supply chains (Reshoring/Just-in-Case Inventory), and the destabilisation of construction economics (Inflation/Labour Shortage).

The Economic Backdrop: Resilience Amidst Headwinds

The Australian economy in 2026 presents a complex picture of "softening" growth overlaid with pockets of intense sectoral heat. The broader economic context is characterised by slowing GDP growth, forecast to moderate to 2.0% in the United States and similarly subdued levels in Australia.¹ However, this aggregate slowing masks the extraordinary capital flows directed toward "alternative" real estate assets, specifically digital infrastructure.

Inflation remains a persistent variable, with headline CPI in Australia rising 3.4% year-on-year in late 2025, consistently tracking above the Reserve Bank of Australia’s (RBA) target band of 2-3%.² This persistent inflationary pressure has profound implications for the RLV Gap. While interest rates have stabilised, with the RBA’s easing cycle largely viewed as complete by 2026 ², the cost of capital remains elevated relative to the pre-2022 era. This capital environment creates a high hurdle rate for new development, reinforcing the "Buy over Build" dynamic.

The demographic engine continues to exert pressure on the physical supply chain. Queensland’s economy is showing resilience with growth of 1.9% year-on-year, expected to accelerate to 3.4% by the end of 2026.² This population growth drives the fundamental consumption metrics that underpin logistics demand. More people equate to higher volumetric throughput of goods, necessitating more square metreage of warehousing per capita. Yet, as the data will show, the supply side of this equation has broken down.

The "TINA" Thematic (There Is No Alternative)

The overarching investment theme for 2026 has been identified as "TINA", There Is No Alternative.³ This applies specifically to the behaviour of occupiers and investors facing a structurally constrained market. For occupiers, there is no alternative but to renew leases at higher rates or compete aggressively for the limited pool of pre-lease options. For investors, there is no alternative but to acquire existing assets, as the feasibility of new construction has evaporated.

This theme is critical to validating the "Land-Use War." If alternatives existed, if developers could simply unlock more land in the Western Corridor or if occupiers could easily substitute a Trade Coast facility for one in Ipswich, the scarcity would be cyclical, not functional. The "TINA" dynamic confirms that the scarcity is functional: the specific type of asset required (serviced, powered, infill) effectively does not exist in the new supply pipeline.

This section examines supply-side rigidity and the 4% equilibrium threshold, testing the forecast of a 3.6% Vacancy Peak and the "Structurally Constrained" status of Brisbane’s serviced land supply. The analysis of Q4 2025 and 2026 outlook data unequivocally validates, and in fact amplifies, this thesis. The market is not merely peaking at a low vacancy rate; it is grinding against a floor of absolute scarcity.

Validation of the Vacancy Peak: The 3.4% Reality

Earlier estimates put the vacancy peak at 3.6%. The data indicate the market has outperformed this tightness. By the fourth quarter of 2025, the industrial vacancy rate in Brisbane had tightened to 3.4%.² This represents a contraction from previous quarters (e.g., 4.2% in Q2 2025 ⁴) and confirms that absorption is outpacing the delivery of new stock.

This 3.4% figure is critical. In industrial real estate economics, a vacancy rate of 4.0% is generally considered the "equilibrium" or "frictional" rate, the point at which rents stabilise and tenants have reasonable options for relocation.⁵ Operating structurally below this threshold (at 3.4%) implies a market in a state of chronic disequilibrium. This maintains immense pricing power in the hands of landlords and validates the "Land-Use War" premise that supply cannot react fast enough to demand signals.

The forecast for 2026 suggests that national industrial property vacancy will trend toward 3.5-3.8%, remaining consistently below the long-run equilibrium of 4%.⁵ This persistence is the key validator. It is not a temporary dip caused by a single large lease; it is a structural condition caused by the inability of the supply chain to deliver serviced land.

The "Serviced Land" Illusion: The 11% Ceiling

The most devastating data point for the supply-side argument, and the strongest validation of "Functional Scarcity", is the disconnect between zoned land and serviced land. While municipal planning maps may show vast tracts of "Industrial" zoning, the economic reality is defined by infrastructure.

Analysis of land supply reports reveals that of the approximately 6,490 hectares of zoned industrial land within the Brisbane Region, only 11% (circa 738 hectares) is classified as "undeveloped and serviced".⁶ This is the "Functional Scarcity" in numerical form. The remaining 89% of zoned land is effectively theoretical supply; it lacks the roads, water, sewage, and critically, the power infrastructure required to host a modern facility.

Furthermore, this 11% effective supply is unevenly distributed, exacerbating the "Infill Squeeze."

• Geographic Displacement: The Western Corridor and M1 Corridor hold the largest shares of this limited serviced supply, with approximately 27% each (178 ha and 177 ha respectively).⁷
• The Infill Void: The Trade Coast precincts (North and South), which are the epicentres for high-value logistics and the preferred zones for "Edge" data centres due to fibre connectivity, hold only 11% of the serviced supply.⁷

This geographic imbalance forces a "Displacement" effect. Large-scale logistics users (Hyperscale demand) are pushed into the Western Corridor not by choice, but by necessity. Meanwhile, the "Infill" users (Last-Mile Logistics and Edge Data Centres) are left fighting over a diminishing pool of brownfield sites in the Trade Coast and North precincts.

Sub-Market Granularity: The "Infill Squeeze" Confirmed

To understand the "War" for land, one must look at the specific battlegrounds. The aggregate 3.4% vacancy rate masks significantly tighter conditions in the high-value precincts.

Brisbane Industrial Market Sub-Sector Analysis (Q4 2025):

Submarket	Vacancy Rate	Average Net Face Rent	Incentive Levels	Strategic Status
M1 Corridor	1.7% 2	$180/sqm	10.0%	Critical Shortage
North Precinct	2.3% 2	$205/sqm	15.0%	Severe Constraint
Trade Coast	3.7% 2	$208/sqm	12.0%	Functional Scarcity
South Precinct	3.8% 2	$161/sqm	19.5%	Tight
West Precinct	3.9% 2	$175/sqm	18.2%	Developing

Table 1: Brisbane Industrial Market Fundamentals Q4 2025.²

The data in Table 1 vividly illustrate the "Infill Squeeze." The M1 Corridor and North Precinct are operating at vacancy rates (1.7% and 2.3%, respectively) that represent zero effective availability for new entrants.

• The North Precinct: With rents at $205/sqm and vacancy at 2.3%, this precinct is the prime target for "Edge" data centre cannibalisation. The high rent reflects the premium on location, but the low vacancy confirms that no new stock is available.
• The Trade Coast: Despite being the logistics hub, vacancy is a tight 3.7%. The rent here is the highest in the market ($208/sqm), driven by the dual demand from port-related logistics and the emerging data centre sector.

Supply Pipeline Analysis: The "Undershoot"

The "Land-Use War" thesis relies on the assumption that supply will not rise to meet this demand. The forecasts confirm this. New supply is set to "undershoot historical levels by 20% to 50% for the rest of the decade".³

• 2025 Actuals: Annual supply reached approx. 460,000 sqm, below the 2023-2024 average of 700,000 sqm.²
• 2026 Forecast: A similar constrained level of 465,000 sqm is anticipated.²
• The Pre-Commitment Lock: Of the pipeline that does exist, a significant portion (41%) is pre-committed.⁹

This "undershoot" validates the structural nature of the shortage. Developers are not banking land for speculative "Edge" nodes; they are constrained by the lack of serviced lots. The Infrastructure Uplift is stalled because the physical infrastructure (serviced land) cannot be delivered fast enough to unlock the value.

This section examines the financial mechanics behind the APN Residual Land Value (RLV) Gap™ that are "halting new speculative supply." The thesis posits that the cost to create a new asset has risen so high that it exceeds the market value of that asset upon completion, creating a negative RLV Gap. This forces capital into a "Buy over Build" strategy, further restricting the creation of new stock.

The "Buy over Build" Mathematics

The research explicitly confirms the "Buy over Build" mandate. The CBRE Pacific Real Estate Market Outlook 2026 states unequivocally: "Pricing remains 30% below replacement cost, favouring a buy-over-build strategy".¹⁰

This 30% valuation gap is a massive structural barrier. It implies that the market has not yet repriced the end-product (the warehouse) to reflect the input costs (land, labour, materials).

• The Logic: If an investor can purchase a functional, income-generating asset in the Trade Coast for $2,800 per square metre, while the cost to buy a raw site, service it, pay infrastructure charges, and build a new facility is $4,000 per square metre ¹¹, there is no rational economic case for speculative development.
• The Consequence: Capital flows are diverted away from supply creation (development) and into asset aggregation (investment). This deepens the scarcity crisis because the capital that would normally fund the next wave of warehouses is instead bidding up the price of the existing 1990s and 2000s vintage stock.

Construction Cost Escalation: The Inflationary Lock

The root cause of this negative RLV Gap is the relentless escalation in construction costs, which continues to outpace rental growth in many sectors.

• Escalation Forecasts: RLB forecasts construction cost growth in 2026 of 5.0% for Brisbane, significantly higher than the 4.0% forecast for Sydney and Melbourne.¹²
• Drivers of Cost: The primary drivers are "tight labour supply," "low productivity," and "limited Tier 1 competition".¹² Queensland, in particular, is suffering from a capacity crunch due to competing demand from major public infrastructure projects and the energy transition.
• Implication for RLV: As construction costs rise by 5% per annum, the "Replacement Cost" benchmark moves further away. Unless rents rise by significantly more than 5% (which they are doing in some precincts, but not all), the feasibility of new projects deteriorates.

Cost vs. Value Dynamic:

• Industrial Warehouse Construction Cost: $1,300 – $2,800 per sqm.¹³ This is the raw build cost.
• Land Values: $689 per sqm (1-5ha) to >$1,200 per sqm (Eagle Farm/Trade Coast).²
• Total Development Cost (TDC): Adding finance, fees, and contingency pushes the TDC well above $4,000/sqm.
• Market Value: Existing prime assets are trading at yields of 5.30% – 6.00%.² With rents at ~$186/sqm ², the capital value is roughly $3,100 – $3,500/sqm. The math barely works for prime; it does not work at all for secondary or smaller infill projects.

The "Speculative Halt"

The negative RLV Gap has effectively halted speculative supply for the sub-2,000sqm market.

• Big Box vs. Small Box: Large institutional developers (e.g., Goodman, ESR) can make the numbers work for 20,000sqm facilities because they often own the land at a historical cost basis (acquired years ago).
• The Infill Developer: The smaller private developer, who typically builds the 500sqm–2,000sqm strata units or freestanding sheds required for last-mile logistics, is locked out. They cannot buy land at 2026 prices and build at 2026 costs and sell at a profit.
• Strategic Outcome: We are seeing a "missing middle" in supply. The only new stock being built is massive distribution centres in the far West. The inner-ring small-to-mid-sized stock is not being replenished. This is the exact stock that "Edge" Data Centres covet.

This section addresses the core of the "Functional Scarcity" thesis through an infrastructure-uplift (digital/power) lens: the displacement and cannibalisation of industrial land by Data Centre demand. It draws a clear distinction between "Hyperscale" and "Edge" demand to show the different impacts each has on the land market.

The Bifurcation: Hyperscale (Displacement) vs. Edge (Cannibalisation)

The research confirms that Data Centre demand is not monolithic. It is bifurcated into two distinct typologies with vastly different land requirements and impacts.

Type A: Hyperscale (The Displacers)

• Function: Cloud computing, AI model training, and massive storage.
• Site Requirement: Very large campuses, typically 10 hectares or more.¹⁵
• Power Requirement: Transmission-level connection (100MW+).
• Location Strategy: Hyperscalers are pushed to the grid periphery where high-voltage transmission lines (132kV/330kV) are accessible, and land is large enough to buffer noise and heat.
• Impact on Logistics: Displacement. By consuming the few remaining large serviced lots in the Western Corridor and Outer South, Hyperscalers force large logistics users (who also need 10ha+ for Distribution Centres) to compete for the same dirt. This pushes logistics users further out, extending the supply chain.

Type B: Edge (The Cannibalisers)

• Function: AI Inference, Content Delivery Networks (CDN), low-latency processing.
• Site Requirement: Small, nimble footprints of 500sqm to 2,000sqm.¹⁵
• Power Requirement: Distribution-level connection (1MW – 5MW).
• Location Strategy: Proximity to the end-user is non-negotiable. "Financial services, gaming, and AR workloads require sub-5ms round-trip times".¹⁵ This mandates locations within the metropolitan ring (Trade Coast, Inner North, South).
• Impact on Logistics: Cannibalisation. Edge operators target the exact same building typology as Last-Mile Logistics: the 1,000sqm freestanding warehouse or the robust industrial unit.

The "High-Power" Infill Squeeze

The "Infill War" is validated by the specific site selection criteria of Edge operators.

• The Criteria: JLL notes that "Power, not location or cost, will be the primary site selection criteria".¹⁷ However, for Edge, location is latency. Therefore, the search is for "Power + Location."
• The Target: Brownfield industrial sites. Developers are explicitly targeting "sub-prime" or "metropolitan real estate" such as older industrial properties to convert them into Edge facilities.¹⁶
• The Premium: An "Edge" user values the 11kV connection far more than the warehouse floor. A standard logistics user utilises <50kW for lighting and charging. An Edge DC utilises 1,000kW (1MW) in the same footprint.
• Value Arbitrage: This creates a massive value arbitrage. If a site has a legacy 11kV connection (perhaps from a former manufacturing tenant), it is worth X as a logistics shed but X + Premium as a Data Centre. The logistics user cannot outbid the Digital Infrastructure fund.

Validating the 500sqm–2,000sqm Competition

The specific hypothesis regarding the 500sqm–2,000sqm footprint is confirmed.

• Telstra / Edge Centres Strategy: Major players are deploying "micro data centres" in retail sites and industrial exchanges across Sydney and Melbourne.¹⁵ Edge Centres specifically target regional and metro locations for facilities that fit within this smaller footprint.¹⁸
• Repurposing: The trend of repurposing "vacant floors of office towers" or industrial sites for data use ¹⁶ confirms that the battle is for existing built form in dense areas, not just empty fields.

Insight: The "Functional Scarcity" is most acute here. The supply of 1,000sqm infill sheds is fixed (and shrinking due to rezoning). Now, a new apex predator (Edge AI) has entered the ecosystem, consuming the "High Power" subset of this fixed supply. This permanently removes these assets from the general logistics pool, forcing Last-Mile logistics into a "Buy over Build" corner for whatever legacy stock remains.

This final section examines whether the "Power War" is real or theoretical, treating utility constraints as the hard cap on the market. If the grid is simply unavailable, then the premium for "power potential" might be speculative. The research confirms that the grid bottleneck is the single greatest constraint, which paradoxically increases the value of sites that have already secured power.

The Weaponisation of Time: Connection Delays

The research confirms that "Power Availability" is a hard constraint measured in years, not months.

• The Queue: Grid connection delays in Australia are severe. Reports indicate that 20% of renewable and infrastructure developers face wait times of 2 to 3 years for grid-connection approval.¹⁹
• The Impact: In the fast-moving world of AI, a 3-year delay is an eternity. "Tenants can no longer assume delivery dates without buffers".¹⁷
• The Value Shift: This delay transforms the value of land. A site with an active connection, or a "Load Letter" confirming capacity, is immediately deployable. A site without it is a 3-year gamble. This bifurcates the market into "Powered Land" (Premium) and "Unpowered Land" (Discounted).

The "Powered Land" Gold Standard

The "Grid Bottleneck" validates the infrastructure-uplift lens perfectly. The uplift is no longer generated by a new highway off-ramp; it is generated by the presence of a substation.

• Inelastic Demand: Data Centres are described as "constant baseload consumers" with "inelastic demand".²⁰ They cannot simply reduce usage during peak times. This makes grid operators extremely cautious about approving new loads in constrained areas.
• The Brownfield Advantage: This constraint drives Edge developers to hunt for "Brownfield" sites with existing capacity rights. Older manufacturing sites in Brisbane’s Trade Coast often possess "Grandfathered" power allocations from previous heavy industrial uses (e.g., brickworks, foundries). These sites allow a developer to bypass the transmission queue by utilising the existing distribution (11kV) capacity.²¹

Insight: The "Grid Bottleneck" does not halt the "Land-Use War"; it intensifies it. It makes the "High-Power" infill sites the most strategic assets in the entire portfolio. It forces "Buy over Build" because you can buy a site with power today, but you cannot build a connection for three years.

The exhaustive stress-test of the "Land-Use War" thesis confirms the strategic validity of the "Functional Scarcity" model. The convergence of macro-economic constraints, digital infrastructure demand, and legacy logistics requirements has created a market that is not just "undersupplied" in the traditional sense, but "functionally broken" for specific user classes.

Key Validations

1. Vacancy Peak (3.6%): VALIDATED & EXCEEDED. The market tightened to 3.4% in Q4 2025 ², proving that demand remains resiliently above the 4.0% equilibrium despite economic headwinds.
2. Serviced Land Supply (11%): VALIDATED. The effective supply of serviced land is critically low at 11% of zoned stock ⁶, creating a hard ceiling on new development.
3. Replacement Cost Barrier (30% Gap): VALIDATED. A 30% gap between Market Value and Replacement Cost ¹⁰ has locked in a "Buy over Build" strategy, halting speculative supply of small-to-mid assets.
4. Power War (Edge vs. Infill): VALIDATED. Edge Data Centres are actively cannibalising the 500sqm–2,000sqm infill market ¹⁵, driven by the need for sub-5ms latency and the immense value of legacy 11kV connections.²⁰

The New Strategic Reality: Redefined

The infrastructure-uplift lens must be recalibrated. The value driver for 2026 is Amperes, not Access.

• Old Model: Value = Proximity to Port/Motorway + Floor Area.
• New Model: Value = Grid Capacity (kVA) + Latency (Location) + Speed to Market (Existing Connection).

The "Infill Squeeze" is the result of this new valuation model. The logistics operator sees a shed; the Data Centre operator sees a "Powered Node." The Data Centre operator can pay a price reflecting the "Digital Utility" of the site, which far exceeds the "Logistics Utility." This permanently removes high-quality infill stock from the logistics market, exacerbating the scarcity for Last-Mile distributors.

Final Outlook

The conclusion is clear: The "Land-Use War" is real, and the "Logistics" sector is losing the battle for the best infill sites. The "Functional Scarcity" is a permanent structural shift, not a cyclical phase. The strategic value lies in identifying legacy assets within the portfolio or market that possess "Latent Power Capacity", hidden 11kV connections or proximity to substations, that have not yet been re-rated by the market as "Edge" assets. These sites represent the maximum potential for Uplift in the 2026 horizon.

1. U.S. Real Estate Market Outlook 2026 | CBRE, accessed February 2026, https://www.cbre.com/insights/books/us-real-estate-market-outlook-2026
2. Brisbane MarketBeat | AU | Cushman & Wakefield, accessed February 2026, https://www.cushmanwakefield.com/en/australia/insights/brisbane-marketbeat
3. CBRE’s 2026 Pacific Market Outlook report | RE Talk Asia, accessed February 2026, https://www.retalkasia.com/news/2026/01/28/cbres-2026-pacific-market-outlook-report/1769557659
4. Brisbane – LOGISTICS & INDUSTRIAL Q2 2025 | Cushman & Wakefield – Marketbeat Template – Local Markets, accessed February 2026, https://assets.cushmanwakefield.com/-/media/cw/marketbeat-pdfs/2025/q2/apac-and-gc/brisbanelimarketbeatq220252.pdf?rev=c411ba66dd054926aa4d38ef1a66d004
5. 4 things Aussie warehouse investors need to know in 2026 – Real Commercial, accessed February 2026, https://www.realcommercial.com.au/news/4-things-aussie-warehouse-investors-need-to-know-in-2026
6. Brisbane Industrial and Logistics Land Supply | CBRE Australia, accessed February 2026, https://www.cbre.com.au/insights/reports/brisbane-industrial-and-logistics-land-supply
7. Population growth and strong occupier demand set to drive ongoing industrial land supply issues in Brisbane – CBRE, accessed February 2026, https://www.cbre.com.au/press-releases/population-growth-and-strong-occupier-demand-to-drive-industrial-land-supply-issues-in-brisbane
8. Population Growth and Strong Occupier Demand Set to Drive Ongoing Industrial Land Supply Issues in Brisbane – Australian Property Markets News, accessed February 2026, https://propertymarkets.news/population-growth-and-strong-occupier-demand-set-to-drive-ongoing-industrial-land-supply-issues-in-brisbane/
9. Brisbane Industrial and Logistics Figures Q4 2025 – CBRE, accessed February 2026, https://www.cbre.com/insights/figures/brisbane-industrial-and-logistics-figures-q4-2025
10. Pacific Real Estate Market Outlook 2026 | CBRE Australia, accessed February 2026, https://www.cbre.com.au/insights/reports/pacific-real-estate-market-outlook-2026
11. Industrial Property Insights & Opportunities: Property Market Briefing, accessed February 2026, https://www.dcpinvest.com.au/industrial-property-insights-opportunities-property-market-briefing/
12. Construction cost escalation to remain elevated in 2026 – RLB | Oceania, accessed February 2026, https://www.rlb.com/oceania/insight/construction-cost-escalation-to-remain-elevated-in-2026/
13. Commercial Building Cost Per Square Metre in Australia (2025 Update) – Matrix Estimating, accessed February 2026, https://matrixestimating.com.au/commercial-building-cost-australia-2025/
14. Brisbane – LOGISTICS & INDUSTRIAL Q3 2025 – Cushman & Wakefield, accessed February 2026, https://assets.cushmanwakefield.com/-/media/cw/marketbeat-pdfs/2025/q3/apac-and-gc/brisbanelimarketbeatq32025.pdf?rev=00b52740bc064cd9b01e80069da600f6
15. Australia Data Center Construction Market Report 2031 – Mordor Intelligence, accessed February 2026, https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/australia-data-center-construction-market
16. Massive industry growth expected: opportunities in data centres for …, accessed February 2026, https://www.allens.com.au/insights-news/insights/2024/08/opportunities-in-data-centres-for-real-estate-developers/
17. 2026 Global Data Center Outlook – JLL, accessed February 2026, https://www.jll.com/en-au/insights/market-outlook/data-center-outlook
18. Edge Centres’ expansion forges ahead with latest acquisition | Data …, accessed February 2026, https://datacentremagazine.com/articles/edge-centres-expansion-forges-ahead-with-latest-acquisition
19. Australia grid delays pose risk to renewable energy targets – PV Magazine, accessed February 2026, https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/11/17/australia-grid-delays-pose-risk-to-renewable-energy-targets/
20. Data Center Power Demand: Grid Impact & Infrastructure – Discovery Alert, accessed February 2026, https://discoveryalert.com.au/data-center-power-demand-2025-ai-cooling-solutions/
21. Distribution and Transmission Annual Planning Report – Ausgrid, accessed February 2026, https://www.ausgrid.com.au/-/media/Documents/Reports-and-Research/Network-Planning/DTAPR-2024.pdf?rev=e2f4a20d58d44532b9637d100f2dc313
22. Regulatory Proposal – Australian Energy Regulator (AER), accessed February 2026, https://www.aer.gov.au/system/files/EnergyAustralia%27s%20Regulatory%20Proposal%202%20June%202008.pdf