Dual occupancy development is a growing trend in the Australian property market, offering opportunities for homeowners and investors to maximise land use. For Australian property professionals, understanding the nuances between battle-axe (house-behind-house) and side-by-side configurations is paramount. Battle-axe developments, cost-effective due to retaining the existing dwelling, are ideal for deep blocks and privacy-focused clients, though shared access and perceived lower value can be drawbacks. Side-by-side subdivisions, requiring wider blocks and potentially higher initial investment including demolition, maximise property value through coveted street frontage and broader market appeal, simplifying access and services.
For agents, highlighting battle-axe privacy and affordability versus side-by-side's enhanced value proposition is key. Developers must weigh cost savings and block suitability against market demand for street frontage. Property managers need to consider the implications of shared driveways in battle-axe setups. The strategic choice between the two hinges on aligning client goals – cost sensitivity and privacy versus value maximization – with site characteristics and market conditions. Mastering these distinctions ensures informed decision-making and success in Australia's expanding dual occupancy landscape.