APN Research Report: Australia's Housing Crisis: A Consolidated Report on Deficits, Backlogs, and Demand Drivers

1. Executive Summary

This report provides a comprehensive, evidence-based analysis of Australia’s housing crisis, substantiating its core drivers and consequences. The analysis confirms the existence of a severe and structural housing deficit at both national and state levels. This deficit is the direct result of a fundamental imbalance where robust, population-driven demand consistently outstrips the capacity of a construction sector hamstrung by a confluence of critical supply-side constraints.

At the national level, the recent peak in Net Overseas Migration (NOM) has created a demand for new dwellings that far exceeds the construction industry’s current completion rate of approximately 177,000 homes per year. This headline deficit is further compounded by a long-term, structural decline in the average household size, which generates significant underlying demand for housing independent of population growth. The consequences of this supply-demand gap are acute, manifesting in historically low rental vacancy rates, persistent and rapid rental price inflation, and a resilient floor under property values that has proven resistant to aggressive monetary policy tightening.

The report finds that the construction industry’s inability to respond to clear market signals is rooted in a multi-faceted supply-side paralysis. This includes chronic and worsening skilled labour shortages, unprecedented cost escalation in building materials since 2020, systemic delays embedded in complex and inefficient planning and approval systems, and a tightening of development finance.

While Net Overseas Migration is a significant and immediate contributor to housing demand, this report demonstrates that the crisis is fundamentally underpinned by decades-long structural factors. Tax settings, particularly negative gearing and the Capital Gains Tax discount, have incentivised leveraged investment in existing property, while a multi-decade structural decline in interest rates has fuelled a dramatic expansion in household credit, capitalising lower borrowing costs directly into higher asset prices. The period between 2020 and 2022 serves as a powerful natural experiment, where house prices surged to record highs even as NOM turned sharply negative, unequivocally demonstrating the primacy of these other demand drivers.

Given the scale of these deeply entrenched supply-side impediments and the persistent nature of demand, the report concludes that the Australian Government’s National Housing Accord target of building 1.2 million new homes over five years is unachievable under current conditions. Meeting this goal and meaningfully addressing the housing crisis will require profound and immediate structural reforms that simultaneously tackle the acute construction backlog and address the long-term drivers of demand.

Part 1: Anatomy of a National Housing Deficit

This section empirically establishes the scale of Australia’s housing shortfall by substantiating the core variables of demand, primarily population growth, and supply, as measured by dwelling completions. It then analyses the real-world consequences of this imbalance on the rental and property markets, demonstrating the direct link between the statistical deficit and the lived experience of housing stress for millions of Australians.

2.1 The Core Equation: Quantifying the Imbalance Between Population Growth and Supply

The foundation of Australia’s housing deficit can be understood through a core equation that pits the demand for new homes against the rate at which they are being built. This analysis substantiates the key components of this equation.

• Net Overseas Migration (NOM): As the primary driver of near-term population growth, NOM has rebounded dramatically since the COVID-19 pandemic. Official Federal Treasury figures show an estimated NOM of 446,000 people for the 2023-24 financial year, a figure that significantly exceeds pre-pandemic averages.¹ While government policy aims to moderate this intake, official projections show NOM is expected to fall but then stabilise at a historically high long-term level, forecast to be 260,000 in 2025-26 and 225,000 per annum thereafter.¹ These figures confirm that the widely cited ~500,000 figure is representative of the recent post-pandemic peak, while the official forward estimates point to a sustained high level of population-driven housing demand for the foreseeable future.
• Dwelling Completions: The supply side of the equation is critically and chronically constrained. The most recent data from the Housing Industry Association (HIA) shows that new home commencements stood at 168,050 in the 2024 calendar year, a level described as remaining at “decade lows”.³ Similarly, the National Housing Supply and Affordability Council (NHSAC) reports that approximately 177,000 new dwellings were completed in 2024.⁵ These figures from leading industry and government advisory bodies substantiate the ~170,000 figure as a realistic measure of Australia’s annual housing supply capacity under the current challenging conditions. This rate of production is starkly insufficient to meet the demand generated by population growth, let alone address the accumulated backlog.
• Average Household Size (AHS): A third, critical variable in the housing demand equation is the average number of people living in each dwelling. The latest Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Census data from 2021 confirms the national average household size is 2.52 persons, a decrease from 2.55 in 2016 and 2.59 in 2011.⁶ More recent and timely analysis from the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA), using Labour Force Survey data, indicates that AHS fell to a historical low of 2.48 individuals by August 2022 before a slight subsequent increase.⁷

This recent fluctuation is part of a powerful, century-long structural trend. As documented by the Australian Institute of Family Studies (AIFS), Australia’s average household size has steadily declined from 4.5 people in 1911 to 2.5 in 2021.⁹ This long-term decline is not a cyclical anomaly but is driven by deep-seated demographic and economic shifts, including an aging population (leading to more single-person and couple-only households), falling fertility rates, and rising household incomes that enable more people to live independently.⁸

This long-term structural decline in household size acts as a powerful and often underestimated multiplier on housing demand. It means that even in a scenario of zero population growth, Australia requires a significant number of new dwellings each year simply to accommodate the existing population’s evolving preference for smaller household formations. The period during the COVID-19 pandemic provided a stark illustration of this dynamic. The RBA estimates that the sharp drop in AHS between early 2020 and September 2022, driven by a “desire for more space” during lockdowns and the rise of remote work, created underlying demand for an additional 120,000 households.⁸ This internal demand shock was large enough to almost entirely offset the “missing” demand from the concurrent period of negative NOM. This demonstrates that housing demand is not solely a function of headline population growth but is also profoundly influenced by social and economic trends within the existing population. Consequently, policy and forecasting models that focus only on the simple relationship between NOM and completions will systematically underestimate the true level of underlying housing demand.

The following table provides a clear visualisation of the fundamental mismatch between housing demand and supply at the national level, forming the foundational evidence for the scale of the current deficit.

Table 1: National Housing Deficit Calculation (Annualised, based on 2023-24 data)

Note: The calculation in Table 1 illustrates the direct deficit based on new population arrivals alone. It does not account for the significant additional underlying demand generated by the long-term decline in average household size within the existing population, which the RBA has estimated can be as high as 120,000 households in a single year.⁸ When this structural factor is considered, the true national housing shortfall is substantially larger than the headline figure suggests.

2.2 State-Level Hotspots: A Comparative Analysis of NSW, Victoria, Queensland, and WA

The national housing deficit is not evenly distributed, with some states experiencing more acute shortfalls due to a combination of higher population growth and more severe construction constraints.

• New South Wales (NSW): The housing shortfall in Australia’s most populous state is particularly severe. With a population forecast to grow from 8.66 million in 2025 to 10.49 million by 2046, the state’s share of the National Housing Accord target requires the delivery of approximately 75,300 new homes annually.¹² However, performance is falling drastically short. In the 2024 calendar year, NSW completed just 45,552 new homes, a decline from the previous year and representing only 60% of the required annual target.¹³ Analysis by the Urban Development Institute of Australia (UDIA) NSW reinforces this grim outlook, forecasting a theoretical maximum of 205,000 dwelling completions in the Sydney megaregion over the five-year Accord period, a staggering 117,000 homes short of the 322,000 target for that region alone.¹⁴ This data confirms an annual deficit of approximately
  30,000 homes, a figure substantially worse than the commonly cited estimate of 20,000.
• Victoria: Victoria faces a similar challenge of high demand and lagging supply. The state’s population is projected to grow from 7.16 million in 2025 to 9.21 million by 2046, and the Victorian government has set an ambitious target of building 80,000 new dwellings annually to accommodate this growth.¹⁵ While Victoria leads the nation in the absolute number of new builds, completing 59,878 dwellings in the 12 months to March 2025, this is still more than 20,000 homes short of its own annual target.¹⁶ The data, therefore, confirms an annual deficit of approximately
  20,000 homes, double the reported claim of 10,000, highlighting the immense pressure on the state’s housing market.
• Queensland: As a primary destination for both interstate and overseas migration, Queensland is experiencing intense population pressure. The state’s population is forecast to grow from 5.69 million in 2025 to 7.26 million by 2046, with growth forecast at a strong 1.75% in 2024-25.^18. While precise state-level completion forecasts are not as readily available, extensive industry and academic analysis points to a significant and growing housing deficit. Reports highlight ballooning social housing waitlists and a severe shortage of affordable rental properties, driven by years of underinvestment in social housing and an influx of new residents.²⁰ The consensus is that construction, particularly of apartments, must increase dramatically to prevent a deepening of the state’s housing crisis.²²
• Western Australia (WA): WA currently has the fastest-growing population in the nation, with an increase of 2.99% in the year to June 2024, and is forecast to grow from 3.01 million in 2025 to 3.91 million by 2046.²³ Despite a recent uptick in construction, supply is failing to keep pace. The state completed over 20,000 homes in 2024, the highest number since 2017, but still fell 4,000 homes short of its annual National Housing Accord target of 24,000.²⁵ Worryingly, official forecasts from the Housing Industry Forecasting Group project that commencements will fall to between 15,000-18,000 annually over the next two years, indicating the deficit is set to widen significantly.²⁷ Analysis by the Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre further quantifies the problem, revealing a shortfall of 7,700 rental homes in Perth alone needed simply to keep pace with recent population growth.²⁵

2.3 Market Consequences: The Unavoidable Pressure on Rents and Property Values

The direct and unavoidable consequence of this structural housing deficit is a market under extreme pressure, characterised by a severe rental crisis and remarkable resilience in property prices despite macroeconomic headwinds.

• Rental Pressure: The housing shortfall has translated directly into a critically tight rental market across the country. National rental vacancy rates are at historical lows. SQM Research reported a national vacancy rate of just 1.3% in June 2025, a figure that indicates an extreme undersupply.²⁸ In major capital cities such as Brisbane, Perth, and Adelaide, conditions are even more acute, with vacancy rates consistently tracking below 1%.²⁸ This severe scarcity of available rental properties provides the fuel for rapid and sustained rental price inflation. This causal link is clearly visible in official data. The ABS Consumer Price Index (CPI) shows the Housing group, which includes rents, rose by 1.2% in the June 2025 quarter alone.³⁰ Over a longer period, CoreLogic data reveals that national median rents have surged by an extraordinary 36.1% since the onset of the pandemic in early 2020.³¹
• Property Price Floor: The chronic undersupply of housing provides a powerful structural support for property values, creating a “price floor” that has made the market remarkably resilient to the most aggressive cycle of interest rate hikes in a generation. While higher borrowing costs typically cool housing demand and lead to price falls, the fundamental lack of available housing has counteracted this effect. Expert commentary from across the economic spectrum confirms this dynamic. The RBA has explicitly stated that “growth in demand is currently running well ahead of supply” and that the impact of this imbalance is clearly visible in rising prices in the established housing market.³² Economists from major banks, including NAB and ANZ, consistently argue that the supply-demand imbalance is having a more significant impact on the market than high interest rates, forming the basis of their forecasts for continued price growth.³³ This view is echoed by property analytics firm CoreLogic, which concludes that “limited housing supply from both a new-build and listings perspective” is a primary reason for the market’s continued strength despite affordability challenges.³⁵

The housing deficit is creating a two-tiered market reality with profound implications for wealth inequality. For the roughly two-thirds of Australian households that own property, the chronic undersupply acts as a powerful support mechanism for their primary asset, insulating their wealth from the shock of higher interest rates. The scarcity of housing ensures their asset remains valuable and in high demand. However, for the one-third of households that rent and for all prospective first-home buyers, this same undersupply manifests as a crisis. It creates hyper-competitive rental markets, drives rapid rental inflation that consumes an ever-larger portion of their income, and pushes the price of entry into homeownership constantly further out of reach. This dynamic means the housing crisis is not merely an affordability issue; it is a systemic engine of wealth inequality, where the financial security of existing property owners is directly bolstered by the very market dynamic that causes acute financial stress for renters and aspiring buyers.

Part 2: From Blueprint to Backlog: Deconstructing Australia’s Supply-Side Paralysis

Despite clear and powerful price signals indicating a severe housing shortage, Australia’s construction industry has been unable to mount an adequate supply response. This section dissects the key constraints that have created a state of supply-side paralysis, explaining why housing completions remain stubbornly low and why ambitious government targets are proving unattainable.

3.1 The Workforce Deficit: Critical Labour and Skills Shortages in Construction

The Australian construction industry is grappling with a severe and deeply entrenched shortage of skilled labour, which acts as a primary brake on its capacity to deliver new housing. Industry bodies have quantified the scale of the deficit in stark terms. Master Builders Australia estimates that the industry needs to attract half a million new workers by 2029 simply to keep pace with existing demand, and that an immediate injection of 130,000 additional workers is required to overcome current shortages.³⁷

The HIA’s Trades Availability Index, a key industry barometer, has consistently registered a shortage of skilled trades since 2021, with the deficit being more acute than at any point in the two decades preceding the pandemic.⁴⁰ The shortages are particularly severe in foundational trades essential for the early stages of home building, such as bricklaying and carpentry, indicating that the bottleneck will persist throughout the construction pipeline.⁴⁰ This lack of available labour is a direct driver of construction costs. HIA data shows that the price of trades increased by 5.5% in the 12 months to March 2025, a rate of growth significantly outpacing broader wage inflation.⁴² The on-the-ground reality for construction firms is challenging; a Master Builders survey revealed that 85% of its members were struggling to find suitably qualified workers, with two-thirds identifying labour shortages as the single biggest issue facing their business.³⁷

3.2 The Cost Escalation Crisis: Volatility in Materials and Inputs Since 2020

Compounding the labour crisis, the construction sector has been battered by unprecedented cost inflation for building materials since 2020. This was initially triggered by global supply chain disruptions during the COVID-19 pandemic and has been sustained by high global energy costs and persistent demand.⁴⁴

The ABS Producer Price Index (PPI) for “Input to the House Construction Industry” provides a clear statistical picture of this cost shock. The index shows annual price growth for materials peaked at an extraordinary 17.3% in the June quarter of 2022, the strongest annual increase since 1981.⁴⁴ While the rate of inflation has since moderated, with the index rising by a more modest 1.6% in the year to June 2025, the cumulative effect has been a significant and permanent increase in the cost base for construction.⁴⁷ Prices for key inputs such as copper pipes, electrical cables, concrete, and timber products remain elevated.⁴⁸ The UDIA’s 2025 State of the Land report explicitly identifies these “elevated (and still growing) material input costs” as a primary reason why housing supply shortages are set to continue, as they directly impact the financial viability of new projects.⁴⁹

3.3 The Regulatory Labyrinth: Planning, Approvals, and Systemic Delays

A third critical constraint on housing supply is the complex, costly, and time-consuming nature of Australia’s land use planning and development approval systems. Both government and industry studies consistently identify these regulatory frameworks as a major bottleneck that stifles productivity and inflates costs.

A recent report from the Productivity Commission concluded that a complicated and slow approval process is a key factor dragging on the housing construction sector’s poor productivity performance.⁵¹ This is particularly evident in NSW, which has been identified in multiple studies as having the slowest planning system in Australia.⁵² The real-world impact of these delays is significant. Research by the Institute of Public Affairs found that it now takes, on average, 12.7 months to build a freestanding house in Australia, a 50% increase in the time taken a decade ago.⁵⁴

These systemic delays impose substantial holding costs on developers, including land taxes, interest payments, and administrative overheads. These costs are ultimately passed on to homebuyers, directly contributing to housing unaffordability.⁵³ Groundbreaking research by the RBA has sought to quantify this “zoning effect,” which represents the premium that planning restrictions add to the price of housing above the physical cost of land and construction. The RBA’s modelling estimated that as of 2016, these restrictions had raised the price of an average detached house by 73% in Sydney and 69% in Melbourne above its marginal cost of supply.⁵⁵ This indicates that regulatory burdens are a primary structural driver of high house prices in Australia’s major cities.

3.4 The Financial Squeeze: The Impact of Tighter Credit on Development Feasibility

The confluence of higher interest rates, soaring construction costs, and a recent wave of builder insolvencies has significantly tightened the availability and increased the cost of finance for property developers. Lenders, both traditional banks and non-bank institutions, have responded to the heightened risk environment by increasing their due diligence and tightening their lending criteria.⁵⁶

The RBA’s Financial Stability Review has acknowledged the challenging operating environment, particularly for smaller construction firms.⁵⁷ Major banks have become more conservative in their lending to the sector, with analysis suggesting that property development often delivers the lowest return on capital while carrying the greatest risk in their loan books.⁵⁸ This has led to a partial retreat by major banks from the construction finance market, creating a void that has been filled by non-bank and private lenders. While these alternative financiers offer greater flexibility, they often do so at a higher cost of capital, further squeezing project margins.⁵⁸ This financial squeeze has a direct impact on the type of housing that gets built. Lender surveys indicate that firms are now less likely to finance affordable and medium-density housing projects, where profit margins are too tight to absorb the high costs of construction and finance. Consequently, the development pipeline is becoming increasingly skewed towards higher-priced, luxury developments that can support the required profit margins.⁵⁶

3.5 An Unattainable Target?: Assessing the Viability of the National Housing Accord

In response to the escalating housing crisis, the Australian government, in partnership with states and territories, established the National Housing Accord. The Accord sets an official and ambitious target to build 1.2 million new, well-located homes over a five-year period, commencing on 1 July 2024.⁶⁰ This target equates to an annual construction rate of 240,000 homes.

However, given the severe supply-side constraints detailed above, there is an overwhelming consensus among industry bodies and independent analysts that this target is unachievable.

• The Housing Industry Association (HIA) forecasts that only 945,000 homes will be completed within the five-year timeframe, representing a shortfall of more than 250,000 dwellings.²²
• The Property Council of Australia projects a similar deficit, estimating a shortfall of 262,000 homes by 2029.⁶¹
• Master Builders Australia provides an even more pessimistic outlook, warning that if construction continues at its current pace of approximately 160,000 starts per year, the shortfall relative to the Accord’s target would exceed 400,000 homes.⁶²
• This scepticism is not confined to the private sector. Leaked briefing notes have revealed that Federal Treasury officials have privately advised the government that the 1.2 million homes target would “not be met” under current conditions.⁶³

The combined impact of shortages in labour and materials, systemic regulatory delays, and tighter financial conditions has created what can be described as a “feasibility cliff.” This cliff makes it economically unviable for developers to build certain types of housing, particularly the medium-density “missing middle” (such as townhouses and low-rise apartments) and affordable housing projects, at the scale required. The costs and risks associated with these projects now outweigh the potential returns for many developers. As a result, the development pipeline is increasingly bifurcating into two extremes: high-end, luxury apartments where substantial margins can absorb the high costs, and detached housing on the urban fringe where land is cheaper. The very housing typologies that are most needed to improve affordability and create more diverse communities are the ones that are not being built. This reveals that the supply-side constraints are not just reducing the quantity of new housing; they are fundamentally altering the type of housing being delivered, creating a self-perpetuating cycle where the lack of affordable housing drives up prices, while the high costs prevent the construction of new affordable stock.

Part 3: Beyond the Headlines: A Nuanced Assessment of Housing Demand Drivers

The public discourse on Australia’s housing crisis often centres on the impact of high levels of migration. While population growth is an undeniable component of housing demand, a singular focus on this factor obscures the more powerful, long-term structural forces that have shaped Australia’s high-priced and undersupplied housing market. This section critically examines the primary drivers of housing demand, demonstrating that decades of policy related to taxation and credit availability have been the principal architects of the current crisis.

4.1 The COVID-19 Anomaly: Price Surges in the Absence of Migration

The period from March 2020 to March 2022 provides a unique and compelling “natural experiment” that challenges the narrative of migration as the primary driver of house prices. During this time, international border closures led to a dramatic collapse in population growth.

• Net Overseas Migration: Official ABS data shows that NOM turned sharply negative. For the 2020-21 financial year, Australia experienced a net outflow of 88,800 people, the largest net loss since the First World War.⁶⁴ While NOM began to recover in the 2021-22 financial year with a net gain of 170,900, this was still significantly below pre-pandemic levels.⁶⁵
• House Prices: In stark contrast to this population shock, Australian house prices experienced one of the most rapid and significant booms in history.

• According to CoreLogic data, from the market trough in September 2020 to the end of March 2022, the national Home Value Index surged by an extraordinary 27.8%.⁶⁶
• ABS data corroborates this explosive growth, showing that the total value of Australia’s residential dwelling stock increased from $7.28 trillion in March 2020 to $10.09 trillion in March 2022, an increase of nearly $3 trillion in just two years.⁶⁸ The ABS Residential Property Price Index for the eight capital cities rose by 23.7% in the 12 months to December 2021 alone.⁶⁹

The clear juxtaposition of negative or low migration with an unprecedented property price boom fundamentally challenges the simplistic narrative that high migration is the sole or even primary cause of housing unaffordability. It demonstrates that other, more powerful forces were at play.

Table 2: COVID-19 Period Analysis: NOM vs. House Price Index (FY2020-FY2022)

4.2 Structural Incentives: The Enduring Impact of Tax Settings on Investor Demand

For decades, Australia’s taxation system has contained powerful incentives that encourage leveraged investment in residential property, artificially inflating demand and distorting market outcomes. The two most significant policies are negative gearing and the 50% Capital Gains Tax (CGT) discount.

• Mechanism and Impact: Negative gearing allows investors to deduct any net rental losses (where expenses, including mortgage interest, exceed rental income) against their other taxable income, such as wages and salaries. The CGT discount allows individuals who have held an asset for more than 12 months to have only 50% of the capital gain included in their assessable income upon sale. Together, these policies create a powerful incentive for investors to purchase property with a primary focus on capital growth rather than rental yield, as they can offset initial losses against their wage income and receive a substantial tax concession on the eventual profit.
• Economic Cost and Distribution: This policy framework comes at a significant cost to the federal budget. The Grattan Institute estimates that these concessions cost taxpayers over $10 billion annually, with the benefits flowing disproportionately to high-income earners.⁷¹ Analysis by the Parliamentary Budget Office (PBO) is even more stark, calculating that the total revenue forgone from these two concessions over the past decade was $84.11 billion. The PBO projects this cost will almost double over the next decade to an astonishing $165.58 billion.⁷⁴
• Effect on Housing Demand: By making leveraged property investment more attractive than other asset classes, these tax settings directly increase the number of investors competing with owner-occupiers for a limited supply of housing, particularly at auctions. This added demand pushes prices higher than they would otherwise be. Academic research and modelling by the Grattan Institute suggest that curbing these concessions would lead to lower house prices, by up to 2%, and more significantly, could increase Australia’s homeownership rate from 67% to 70% by levelling the playing field between investors and first-home buyers.⁷²

4.3 The Era of Cheap Money: Three Decades of Credit Expansion and Its Effect on Asset Prices

Perhaps the most powerful and persistent driver of Australian housing prices over the past three decades has been the structural decline in the cost of credit and the corresponding expansion in household debt.

• Long-Term Decline in Interest Rates: Historical data from the RBA shows a clear, multi-decade structural decline in the official cash rate. From a peak of over 17% in 1990, the cash rate trended consistently downwards, punctuated by cyclical movements, until it reached a record low of 0.10% in November 2020.⁷⁶
• Link to Mortgage Debt and Property Values: There is a strong and widely accepted causal link between this decline in interest rates and the long-term growth in housing prices.⁷⁸ As interest rates fall, the cost of servicing a mortgage decreases, which directly increases the maximum amount a household can borrow. In a supply-constrained market, this increased borrowing capacity does not primarily lead to more houses being built; instead, it is capitalised directly into higher prices for the existing housing stock. This dynamic has fuelled a dramatic increase in household indebtedness. Australia’s household debt-to-income ratio has risen from being in the bottom half of advanced economies in the late 1980s to being in the top quartile, one of the highest in the world.⁸⁰ Analysis by Commonwealth Bank economists highlights this long-term trend, noting that “real home prices have grown by ~3.3%/yr since 1990, compared to real household disposable income growth of ~2.9%/yr,” citing lower neutral interest rates and easier credit availability as the key structural supports for this divergence.⁸²

The historical data demonstrates the primacy of credit conditions over population growth as the key determinant of Australian house prices. The multi-decade property boom, which began in the mid-1990s, correlates almost perfectly with the structural decline in interest rates and the associated explosion in household debt. This long-term trend has been a far more powerful and persistent force than the cyclical fluctuations in migration intake. The COVID-19 period served as the ultimate validation of this principle. With the migration lever switched off (negative NOM) but the credit lever pushed to its absolute maximum (a 0.10% cash rate), the market responded not to the lack of population growth but to the abundance of cheap credit, resulting in one of the fastest price booms in the nation’s history. This indicates that while migration adds a significant layer of demand, the foundational price level of the market and its sensitivity to demand shocks are primarily determined by the prevailing credit environment.

4. Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations

The evidence consolidated in this report demonstrates that Australia’s housing crisis is the product of a severe and persistent structural imbalance. It is not a recent phenomenon, nor is it attributable to a single cause. Rather, it is the culmination of decades of policy settings that have inflated demand, meeting a supply side that is now fundamentally broken and unable to respond.

The core of the crisis is a quantitative deficit: the number of new households being formed, driven by a combination of high Net Overseas Migration and a long-term trend towards smaller average household sizes, is significantly greater than the number of new homes being built. This has resulted in record-low rental vacancies, rapid rental inflation, and a structural floor under property prices that has entrenched wealth inequality between property owners and non-owners.

The construction sector’s inability to bridge this gap is due to a multifaceted paralysis. Critical shortages of skilled labour, a legacy of volatile material cost inflation, inefficient and slow planning systems that add significant costs and delays, and a constrained financing environment have collectively created a “feasibility cliff.” This cliff makes it economically unviable to deliver the medium-density and affordable housing that is most needed, skewing development towards high-end projects and rendering the government’s ambitious 1.2 million homes target under the National Housing Accord unachievable without radical intervention.

While migration is a significant contemporary driver of demand, the COVID-19 period, where prices surged amid negative migration, proved conclusively that the foundations of Australia’s high-cost housing market were laid by long-term structural factors. A multi-decade decline in interest rates has fuelled an unprecedented expansion of household credit, while generous tax concessions have incentivised leveraged investment in property as a financial asset rather than as shelter.

Addressing this complex, multi-layered crisis requires an equally sophisticated and integrated policy response that moves beyond simplistic narratives and addresses the root causes on both the supply and demand sides.

Strategic Recommendations:

1. Launch a National Construction Workforce Initiative: Address the acute labour shortage by immediately streamlining skilled migration pathways for construction trades, establishing a specific construction trade contractor visa, and investing heavily in domestic workforce development through expanded funding for apprenticeships, pre-apprenticeship programs, and a national campaign to promote careers in construction trades.
2. Implement Sweeping Planning and Regulatory Reform: Adopt the recommendations of the Productivity Commission to reduce regulatory burdens and streamline approval processes. This should include establishing state-level development coordination bodies, mandating statutory timelines for approvals, harmonising building codes nationally to support innovation like modular construction, and reforming developer contribution schemes to be more transparent and cost-reflective.
3. Unlock Supply with Strategic Infrastructure Investment: The Federal Government should partner with states to fund the enabling infrastructure (water, sewerage, transport, energy) required to unlock “development-ready” land in strategic growth corridors. This public investment is critical to de-risking projects and improving the feasibility of large-scale residential developments.
4. Undertake a Phased, Long-Term Review of Housing Taxation: Acknowledge the distorting impact of current tax settings on housing demand. The government should commission an independent review, with a view to implementing a gradual, phased-in reform of negative gearing and the Capital Gains Tax discount over a five-to-ten-year period. The goal should be to reduce the tax-driven incentive for speculative investment in existing housing and improve the neutrality of the tax system between different asset classes.
5. Recalibrate the National Housing Accord: The 1.2 million homes target, while aspirational, must be recalibrated to be a realistic blueprint for action rather than a performative goal. This requires breaking down the target into specific dwelling types (social, affordable, market-rate) and locations, and directly linking it to the funding and reforms in workforce, planning, and infrastructure needed to make its achievement plausible.

Works cited

1. Budget Paper No. 3 – Budget.gov.au, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://budget.gov.au/content/bp3/download/bp3_14_appendix_a.pdf
2. Treasury’s migration forecast looks shaky as long-term numbers set to surge, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://independentaustralia.net/politics/politics-display/treasurys-migration-forecast-looks-shaky-as-long-term-numbers-set-to-surge,19943
3. New home building remains at decade lows – HIA, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://hia.com.au/our-industry/newsroom/economic-research-and-forecasting/2025/04/new-home-building-remains-at-decade-lows
4. Total dwelling commencements drop quarter on quarter – Broker Daily, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.brokerdaily.au/property/20285-total-dwelling-commencements-drop-quarter-on-quarter
5. Australia is forecast to fall 262000 homes short of its housing target. We need bold action, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://architectureau.com/articles/australia-is-forecast-to-fall-262000-homes-short-of-its-housing-target-we-need-bold-action/
6. Household size | Australia – id’s community profiles, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://profile.id.com.au/australia/household-size
7. A New Measure of Average Household Size – Reserve Bank of Australia, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.rba.gov.au/publications/bulletin/2023/mar/pdf/a-new-measure-of-average-household-size.pdf
8. A New Measure of Average Household Size | Bulletin – March 2023 …, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.rba.gov.au/publications/bulletin/2023/mar/a-new-measure-of-average-household-size.html
9. Population, households and families | Australian Institute of Family …, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://aifs.gov.au/research/facts-and-figures/population-households-and-families
10. Unpacking average household size – e61 INSTITUTE, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://e61.in/unpacking-average-household-size/
11. Australia’s resilient housing demand reflects strong adult population growth – PEXA, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.pexa.com.au/content-hub/housing-demand-reflects-strong-adult-population-growth/
12. New South Wales – About the forecast areas | Australia | Population forecast – .id (informed decisions), accessed on August 11, 2025, https://forecast.id.com.au/australia/about-forecast-areas?WebID=100
13. NSW housing shortfall deepens as completions drop further in 2024 – Broker News, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.brokernews.com.au/news/breaking-news/nsw-housing-shortfall-deepens-as-completions-drop-further-in-2024-286983.aspx
14. UDIA NSW | Housing Accord Progress Report Q1 2024, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.udiansw.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/UDIA-NSW-Housing-Accord-Progress-Report-Q1-2024-1.pdf
15. Victoria – About the forecast areas | Australia | Population forecast – .id (informed decisions), accessed on August 11, 2025, https://forecast.id.com.au/australia/about-forecast-areas?WebID=110
16. Dwelling completions climbed 6% over the last year in Victoria – AXTON Finance, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.axtonfinance.com.au/blog/dwelling-completions-climbed-6-over-the-last-year-in-victoria/
17. Victorian Building Activity Shows Progress, Challenges Remain | Mirage News, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.miragenews.com/victorian-building-activity-shows-progress-1497355/
18. Queensland – About the forecast areas | Australia | Population forecast – .id (informed decisions), accessed on August 11, 2025, https://forecast.id.com.au/australia/about-forecast-areas?WebID=120
19. About the Queensland Economy, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.treasury.qld.gov.au/queenslands-economy/about-the-queensland-economy/
20. The Big Question: How can we solve the housing crisis? – The University of Queensland, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://stories.uq.edu.au/contact-magazine/how-to-solve-the-housing-crisis/index.html
21. Queensland housing stress more intense than any other state: report – UNSW Sydney, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.unsw.edu.au/newsroom/news/2024/06/queensland-housing-stress-more-intense-than-any-other-state-report
22. HIA: Australia forecast to miss 1.2 million new homes construction target – realestate.com.au, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.realestate.com.au/news/hia-australia-forecast-to-miss-12-million-new-homes-construction-target/
23. Estimated Resident Population (ERP) | Western Australia Parliamentary Library, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://profile.id.com.au/wapl/population-estimate
24. Western Australia – Population Forecasts, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://forecast.id.com.au/australia/about-forecast-areas?WebID=140
25. New report reveals depth of WA’s housing crisis | Curtin University, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.curtin.edu.au/news/media-release/new-report-reveals-depth-of-was-housing-crisis/
26. New report reveals scale of WA’s deepening housing crisis | Australian Broker News, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.brokernews.com.au/news/breaking-news/new-report-reveals-scale-of-was-deepening-housing-crisis-287382.aspx
27. Housing Industry Forecasting Group – Western Australian Government, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.wa.gov.au/system/files/2024-11/final-housing-industry-forecasting-group.pdf
28. The Latest Rental Vacancy Rates around Australia – Property Update, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://propertyupdate.com.au/rental-vacancy-rates/
29. Rental vacancy rates rise to 1.3% in April – SQM Research, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://sqmresearch.com.au/uploads/13_5_25_National_Vacancy_Rates_april_2025.pdf
30. Consumer Price Index, Australia, June Quarter 2025 – Australian Bureau of Statistics, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/economy/price-indexes-and-inflation/consumer-price-index-australia/latest-release
31. Australia’s Rental Growth Slows to Four-Year Low | The Urban Developer, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.theurbandeveloper.com/articles/australia-rental-growth-slow-corelogic-quarterly-review-january-2025
32. Housing Market Cycles and Fundamentals | Speeches – Reserve Bank of Australia, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.rba.gov.au/speeches/2024/sp-ag-2024-05-16.html
33. Big banks say strong housing demand to keep driving price growth – Australian Property Update, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://australianpropertyupdate.com.au/apu/big-banks-says-strong-housing-demand-to-keep-driving-price-growth
34. House prices heading in opposite directions – ANZ, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.anz.com.au/bluenotes/2024/september/anz-news-madeline-dunk-house-prices-research/
35. August rate cut to further boost home values, but with limits – CoreLogic Australia, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.corelogic.com.au/news-research/news/2025/August-rate-cut-to-further-boost-home-values-but-with-limits
36. Interest rate cut fuels price surge – Australian Property Update, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://australianpropertyupdate.com.au/apu/interest-rate-cut-fuels-price-surge
37. Australian construction industry calls for skilled migration overhaul to ease ‘desperate’ shortage of tradies – The Guardian, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2024/nov/02/australian-construction-industry-calls-for-skilled-migration-overhaul-to-ease-desperate-shortage-of-tradies
38. Construction industry workforce shortage needs to be addressed – Build Australia, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.buildaustralia.com.au/news_article/mba-calls-for-urgent-action-to-address-construction-industry-workforce-shortage/
39. Builders pave the way for solving workforce shortages, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://masterbuilders.com.au/builders-pave-the-way-for-solving-workforce-shortages-2/
40. HIA Trades Report – Department of Home Affairs, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.homeaffairs.gov.au/reports-and-pubs/files/migration-system-aust-future-submissions/g-l/Housing_Industry_Association_2_of_2.pdf
41. Skilled trades shortage set to worsen without policy changes – HIA, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://hia.com.au/our-industry/newsroom/economic-research-and-forecasting/2025/02/skilled-trades-shortage-set-to-worsen-without-policy-changes
42. Low volume of home building but labour shortages linger – HIA, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://hia.com.au/our-industry/newsroom/economic-research-and-forecasting/2025/05/low-volume-of-home-building-but-labour-shortages-linger
43. Labour Shortage In The Construction Industry | The Access Group, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.theaccessgroup.com/en-au/construction/resources/labour-shortage-in-the-construction-industry/
44. The cost of construction – HIA, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://hia.com.au/our-industry/housing/in-focus/2022/05/the-cost-of-construction
45. From volatility to vision – Slattery Australia, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://slattery.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Slattery-National-Market-Update-March-2025.pdf
46. How Do Changes in Global Shipping Costs Affect Australian Inflation? | Bulletin – July 2025, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.rba.gov.au/publications/bulletin/2025/jul/how-do-changes-in-global-shipping-costs-affect-australian-inflation.html
47. Producer Price Indexes, Australia, June 2025 | Australian Bureau of Statistics, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/economy/price-indexes-and-inflation/producer-price-indexes-australia/latest-release
48. Home building materials prices still slower than CPI – HIA, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://hia.com.au/our-industry/newsroom/economic-research-and-forecasting/2025/08/home-building-materials-prices-still-slower-than-cpi
49. UDIA State of the Land Report shows housing crisis will deepen over the year ahead due to multi-faceted challenges, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://udia.com.au/2025/03/udia-state-of-the-land-report-shows-housing-crisis-will-deepen-over-the-year-ahead-due-to-multi-faceted-challenges/
50. UDIA STATE OF THE LAND 2025, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://udia.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/State-Of-The-Land-Report-2025-Final-Report.pdf
51. Productivity Commission’s report a ‘love letter’ to housing supply – Property Council Australia, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.propertycouncil.com.au/property-australia/productivity-commissions-report-a-love-letter-to-housing-supply
52. Are Planning Approval Process Affecting Your Project? | MPN – Structural Design & Engineering, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://mpn.com.au/are-planning-approval-process-affecting-your-project/
53. UDIA reveals direct connection between delays in planning approvals and house prices, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.udiansw.com.au/udia-reveals-direct-connection-between-delays-in-planning-approvals-and-house-prices/
54. Home approvals rise but delays & costs still undermine supply targets, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://australianpropertyupdate.com.au/apu/housing-approvals-rise-but-delays-and-costs-still-undermine-supply-targets
55. The Effect of Zoning on Housing Prices – Reserve Bank of Australia, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.rba.gov.au/publications/rdp/2018/pdf/rdp2018-03.pdf
56. Builders’ reputations key in construction finance as lenders raise due diligence, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.mpamag.com/au/news/general/builders-reputations-key-in-construction-finance-as-lenders-raise-due-diligence/489549
57. Financial Stability Review | April 2025 – Reserve Bank of Australia, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.rba.gov.au/publications/fsr/2025/apr/pdf/financial-stability-review-2025-04.pdf
58. Private Construction Loans: Flexible Financing Options – Bowery Capital, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.bowery.com.au/private-construction-loans/
59. A Developer’s Guide to Property Development Loans in Australia – Billbergia Group, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.billbergia.com.au/a-developers-guide-to-property-development-loans-in-australia/
60. Delivering the National Housing Accord | Treasury.gov.au, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://treasury.gov.au/policy-topics/housing/accord
61. Housing Targets Turn 1: We Need Five-Year Rolling Plans to Boost Supply Productivity, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.propertycouncil.com.au/media-releases/housing-targets-turn-1-we-need-five-year-rolling-plans-to-boost-supply-productivity
62. Worst year for new home builds in over 10 years marks need for action on labour shortages, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.mbansw.asn.au/media/industry-news/worst-year-new-home-builds-over-10-years-marks-need-action-labour-shortages
63. ‘We need to do better’: Australia’s 1.2m home building goal comes under friendly fire, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.realestate.com.au/news/we-need-to-do-better-australias-1-2m-home-building-goal-comes-under-friendly-fire/
64. Overseas Migration, 2020–21 | Centre for Population, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://population.gov.au/data-and-forecasts/key-data-releases/overseas-migration-2020-21
65. Overseas Migration, 2021–22 | Centre for Population, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://population.gov.au/data-and-forecasts/key-data-releases/overseas-migration-2021-22
66. ANZ CoreLogic Housing Affordability Report 2022, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.anz.com.au/newsroom/news/2022/05/anz-news-corelogic-housing-affordability-report-2022/
67. ANZ Corelogic housing affordability report, released May 2022, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.anz.com.au/content/dam/anzcomau/news/articles/2022/May/ANZ_Housing%20Affordibility%20report%20May_2022_web.pdf
68. Total Value of Dwellings, March Quarter 2025 | Australian Bureau of Statistics, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/economy/price-indexes-and-inflation/total-value-dwellings/latest-release
69. Residential Property Price Indexes: Eight Capital Cities – Australian Bureau of Statistics, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/economy/price-indexes-and-inflation/residential-property-price-indexes-eight-capital-cities/latest-release
70. Australia’s Residential Property Market Analysis 2025, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.globalpropertyguide.com/pacific/australia/price-history
71. Hot property: negative gearing and capital gains tax – Grattan Institute, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://grattan.edu.au/report/hot-property/
72. Why negative gearing should be on the table – Grattan Institute, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://grattan.edu.au/news/why-negative-gearing-should-be-on-the-table/
73. Hot property: Negative gearing and capital gains tax reform – Grattan Institute, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://grattan.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/872-Hot-Property.pdf
74. $84bn lost to housing tax lurks? – University of Technology Sydney, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.uts.edu.au/news/2024/09/84bn-lost-housing-tax-lurks
75. Negative Gearing and Welfare: A Quantitative Study for the Australian Housing Market – Reserve Bank of Australia, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.rba.gov.au/publications/workshops/research/2017/pdf/rba-workshop-2017-simon-cho-may-li.pdf
76. Australia Policy Rate, 1990 – 2025 | CEIC Data, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.ceicdata.com/en/indicator/australia/policy-rate
77. History of RBA Cash Rate in Australia | InfoChoice, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.infochoice.com.au/rba/history-of-interest-rate-movements
78. A perfect storm for housing affordability in Australia – Firstlinks, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.firstlinks.com.au/a-perfect-storm-for-housing-affordability-in-australia
79. RDP 2019-01: A Model of the Australian Housing Market | RBA, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.rba.gov.au/publications/rdp/2019/2019-01/full.html
80. Why is Australian Household Debt High Relative to History and Other Countries? | RDP 2020-05 – Reserve Bank of Australia, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.rba.gov.au/publications/rdp/2020/2020-05/why-is-australian-household-debt-high-relative-to-history-and-other-countries.html
81. The household debt-to-income ratio in Australia – Compare the Market, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.comparethemarket.com.au/home-loans/statistics/household-debt-income-ratio/
82. CBA: Rate cuts drive home price rise, but affordability tightens | Australian Broker News, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.brokernews.com.au/news/breaking-news/cba-rate-cuts-drive-home-price-rise-but-affordability-tightens-287745.aspx