--- title: "Australia’s Construction Insolvency Crisis: Widening the Land Value Gap & Driving Negative Sentiment" url: https://australianproperty.network/apn-research/apn-research-brief-validation-of-construction-insolvency-impact-on-rlv-gap-24400-professional-sentiment-24300/ date: 2025-11-10 modified: 2026-08-29 lang: en author: "APN Academy" description: "A consolidated analysis of how sustained, elevated construction industry insolvencies are widening the Residual Land Value (RLV) Gap and driving negative professional sentiment across the construction sector." word_count: 3693 --- # Australia’s Construction Insolvency Crisis: Widening the Land Value Gap & Driving Negative Sentiment APN Research — Construction Cost & Insolvency # Australia's Construction Insolvency Crisis: Widening the Land Value Gap & Driving Negative Sentiment This brief presents a consolidated analysis of the relationship between construction industry insolvencies, the Residual Land Value (RLV) Gap, and professional sentiment in the sector. The research confirms that the sustained, elevated rate of construction industry insolvencies is a primary mechanism actively widening the RLV Gap (24410) and simultaneously registering as a high-impact negative influence on the APN Professional Sentiment Index™ (24300). [Construction Cost & Insolvency Research Hub →](https://australianproperty.network/apn-research/construction-cost-insolvency-research-hub/) [Back to APN Research](https://australianproperty.network/apn-research/) 1Executive Summary This brief presents a consolidated analysis of the relationship between construction industry insolvencies, the Residual Land Value (RLV) Gap, and professional sentiment in the sector. The research confirms that the sustained, elevated rate of construction industry insolvencies is a primary mechanism actively widening the RLV Gap (24410) and simultaneously registering as a high-impact negative influence on the APN Professional Sentiment Index™ (24300). The findings are structured around four themes. The first verifies the collapse of "Bundamba Property Holdings" as a salient, mid-tier archetype of the crisis.1 The second quantifies the "sustained, elevated rate" of insolvencies, confirming a multi-year crisis that is now plateauing at a record high, driven primarily by the collapse of small-scale subcontractors.2 This systemic failure at the base of the supply chain is the engine of the RLV Gap expansion. The analysis demonstrates a direct causal chain: the high volume of collapses creates systemic risk, which is now being actively priced into all new projects. This cost transmission occurs via three primary mechanisms: 1) rising, non-negotiable insurance premiums to cover record non-completion claims4; 2) a new, hidden "risk premium" being priced into subcontractor bids to hedge against main contractor default6; and 3) the compounding financial impact of project delays, quantified at up to $100,000 per home.7 This systemic cost inflation directly erodes project viability, widening the RLV Gap. Finally, the analysis confirms this risk environment is the primary driver of negative professional sentiment. Despite high general business optimism in Q3 20258, construction-specific indicators show "low confidence on capacity to deliver"9 and, most critically, "negative forward orders" as of September 2025.10 This demonstrates a rational, sector-specific pessimism rooted in the non-viability of new projects. The brief concludes with strategic recommendations to refine the RLV Gap (24410) and Sentiment Index (24300) models to account for this new, systemic insolvency risk. 2Case Study Verification: Bundamba Property Holdings #### Administrator Appointment and Liquidation Status Primary source documents from the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) confirm the insolvency and formal liquidation of Bundamba Property Holdings Pty Ltd. An application for the winding up of the company (ACN 161 629 009) was first lodged on 15 May 2025.11 Subsequently, ASIC records confirm the company was placed into "Court Liquidation" on 18 June 2025. This action was by order of the Supreme Court of New South Wales, which appointed Bruce Gleeson of Jones Partners as the official liquidator.12 The company was therefore insolvent within the Q2 2025 period referenced throughout this brief. #### Verification of Developer Tier and Debt Quantum Credible secondary analysis from the legal and financial sector substantiates the company's operational profile and debt levels. A legal analysis report identifies the entity as "Queensland Property Group, operating through Bundamba Property Holdings Pty Ltd".1 This report validates its classification as a "small-to-mid-tier developer" based in Ipswich, Queensland. The same source directly verifies the A$45 million debt figure: "The Ipswich-based company reportedly owes over A$45 million to creditors".1 All of these details are therefore confirmed as accurate. #### Why This Case Matters The Bundamba case serves as a critical archetype for the central hypothesis. The failure of an established "mid-tier" developer demonstrates that the insolvency crisis, while numerically dominated by small firms (as detailed in the next section), is now "graduating" to entities with significant market exposure. The collapse of a mid-tier player with a A$45 million creditor exposure has a disproportionately large "domino effect" on its entire supply chain.13 This case exemplifies the causal chain: the persistent failure of small subcontractors eventually starves mid-tier builders of a stable supply chain, creating the exact project delays and cost overruns that lead to their own collapse. Bundamba's failure is not an isolated event; it is the *consequence* of the systemic issues quantified in the following section and a *cause* of the risk-based cost inflation detailed in the RLV Gap analysis after it. Furthermore, the liquidator's focus on "unpaid fines, inter-company loans, and the management of ongoing residential projects"1 suggests complex and opaque financial structures. Such a high-profile, complex failure amplifies the *perceived risk* for lenders and subcontractors, who will subsequently apply a higher risk premium when dealing with *all* other mid-tier developers, directly feeding the cost-inflation mechanism. 3Quantification of Insolvency Trends #### Sustained, Elevated Rate of Collapse (ASIC & CreditorWatch) All available data from H2 2024 through Q3/Q4 2025 confirms the "sustained, elevated rate" of construction industry collapses. This is a long-term structural trend, not a short-term shock. ASIC data from early 2025 shows 2,636 construction companies became insolvent in the financial year to March 2025, a surge of 18%14 to 23%2 year-on-year. As of May 2025, the construction industry was the "single largest contributor to corporate insolvencies across Australia," outpacing the next closest industry by 45%.15 The "sustained" nature of this trend is confirmed by multi-year longitudinal data, which shows a clear upward trajectory of accelerating failures. This is synthesised in Table 3.1 below. #### Table 3.1: Australian Construction Insolvencies (2022-2025) | **Reporting Period** | **Total Construction Insolvencies** | **Year-on-Year (Y-o-Y) Change** | **Source(s)** | | -------------------- | ----------------------------------- | ------------------------------- | ------------- | | CY 2022 | 1,793 | - | 2 | | CY 2023 | 2,546 | +42.0% | 2 | | CY 2024 | 3,217 | +26.0% | 2 | | 12 Mos to Mar 2025 | 2,636 | +23.0% (vs. 12 mos to Mar 2024) | 2 | Further analysis confirms this trend has continued through 2025. The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) noted in April 2025 that the share of companies entering insolvency has "risen sharply... to be at the top of the range observed in the 2010s".16 By Q3 2025, CreditorWatch analysis from July 2025 confirmed that insolvencies "plateau at elevated levels".17 While showing "early signs of stabilisation," the construction sector remains one of the "hardest hit" industries.19 #### Nuanced Analysis: The Small-Firm-Driven Crisis A critical nuance captured in the 2024-2025 data is a clear bifurcation of risk within the industry. Analysis from Equifax, based on ASIC data released in November 2024, indicates that the "record highs" in overall construction business failures are being driven almost entirely by "businesses employing less than 5 full-time staff".3 Conversely, the pace of "mid to large construction businesses" (those with revenues over $10.0m) entering external administration has "slowed" or "stabilised".3 This is not a sign of health, but rather evidence of a systemic "domino effect".13 The high-volume failure of the subcontractor base, the small firms, creates profound disruption, leading to "project delays, cost overruns"20 that starve mid-tier developers (like Bundamba, discussed above) of a stable supply chain. This hollowing out of the industry's base is the primary engine of the cost inflation and delays detailed in the next section. The RBA confirms that while most insolvent firms are "small with little debt"16, the impact on the supply chain is devastating. Administrator reports show "more than 80 per cent... have an estimated dividend payout of 0 cents in the dollar to unsecured creditors".16 This total loss for suppliers and subcontractors fuels the risk-averse, cost-inflationary behaviour quantified in the next section. 4RLV Gap & Viability Impact (24410) #### The RLV Mechanism: Construction Costs as the Primary Variable The Residual Land Value (RLV) methodology is the industry standard for determining development viability.21 Its structure makes it acutely sensitive to the cost inputs exacerbated by the insolvency crisis. The RLV is not a fixed value; it is the *output* of a calculation, or the "residual value".22 Synthesising industry definitions, the formula is: RLV = GDV − [All Costs (incl. Construction, Finance, Profit Margin)].21 "Land price is defined as the difference between the market value of the property and its construction costs".22 Therefore, any unanticipated *increase* or *volatility* in the construction cost variable *directly* and *proportionally* erodes the RLV. The "sustained, elevated rate" of insolvencies detailed above is no longer a peripheral "risk"; it has become a new, systemic *cost* that is being actively priced into RLV calculations. This pricing occurs via three distinct mechanisms, which cumulatively widen the RLV Gap (24410) by rendering fewer projects viable. #### Quantified Cost Impact 1: Rising Insurance Premiums The insolvency trend detailed above is a direct cause of "rising insurance premiums," a new, hard cost that erodes project feasibility. A Q2 2025 Market Intelligence Update from quantity surveying firm RLB *explicitly* states that "residential projects struggle to meet government targets, hindered by rising insurance premiums".4 This is a direct financial consequence of that trend. The collapse of major builders like Porter Davis23 and the cumulative trend represented by Bundamba forces state-backed warranty insurance schemes to pay out record sums. In Queensland, the QBCC reported an "unprecedented $88.7 million in insurance claims approved during 2023-2024," a 140% increase in claim values over the past decade.5 The vast majority of this, $62.9 million, was for "non-completion claims" directly related to builder collapses.5 To cover these massive losses and price the "new normal" of high insolvency risk24, insurers "are raising premiums, tightening underwriting requirements, and limiting coverage options for high-risk construction projects".25 This extends to Professional Indemnity (PI) insurance for consultants, where insolvency risk26 and new regulations (like the DBP Act28) create a high-risk environment, increasing PI costs that are passed on to the project. This cost is systemic, inelastic, and a permanent new addition to the "construction cost" side of the RLV equation, directly suppressing land value. #### Quantified Cost Impact 2: Subcontractor Risk Pricing Subcontractors, who bear the brunt of the 0-cent creditor payouts16, are no longer absorbing the risk of main contractor insolvency. They are now actively pricing this "risk premium" into their bids, creating a second, parallel layer of cost inflation. Direct evidence from a Queensland Productivity Commission (QPC) report is explicit: "subcontractors... factor this risk premium into their bid price, resulting in an increase in project costs".6 This is a rational response to the "domino effect"13 that is "prevalent" in the supply chain. The "failure of one firm, particularly any main contractor, often triggering a chain reaction of financial difficulties for subcontractors and suppliers who rely on timely payments".13 Faced with systemic counterparty risk, the subcontractor's only defence is to price this risk into all new contracts. This creates a feedback loop: insolvencies rise, subcontractors price in risk, project costs rise, more developers fail, and risk premiums rise further still. This spiral is a primary mechanism widening the RLV Gap. #### Quantified Cost Impact 3: Project Delays and Compounding Costs The *act* of a builder collapse injects massive, unbudgeted costs and delays, and the *risk* of such delays is now being factored into feasibility models. When a builder fails, the "immediate fallout includes project delays, cost overruns and the need to engage another licensed builder... at additional expense".20 This is not a trivial amount. The Property Council of WA confirmed in October 2025 that "project delays are adding up to **$100,000 per detached home**".7 This risk also impacts financing. Tighter lending conditions have "led to more project delays and, in some cases, cancellations," with "projects... taking much longer at every stage".29 This increases holding and finance costs, which are loaded directly onto the RLV model. RLV models must now include a significant contingency buffer to account for main-contractor or critical-subcontractor failure, a cost that itself "erodes development viability".30 #### Synthesised Impact on Development Viability (24410) The cumulative impact of these new, insolvency-driven costs (Insurance, Risk-Pricing, Delays) directly "erode development viability," reinforcing this brief's analysis of the RLV Gap. Industry bodies confirm this state of play. The Urban Development Institute of Australia (UDIA) stated that new charges, functionally identical to these new risk costs, "will erode development viability and result in further stagnation... leading to even less housing supply".30 In a 2025 submission, UDIA reiterated that "feasibility is already deeply constrained" and these new costs "suppress supply".31 Economic testing of new costs confirms that projects "that are just viable would likely become marginal".32 These cost impacts are not marginal; they are systemic. The RLV Gap (24410) is the space between a viable and an unviable project. By systemically inflating the "construction cost" variable, the insolvency crisis has become a primary driver in pushing formerly "just viable" projects into the "marginal" or "unviable" category, thus widening the Gap. The following table itemises these mechanisms. #### Table 4.1: RLV Gap Impact Analysis (Insolvency-Related Cost Mechanisms) | **Insolvency-Driven Cost Mechanism** | **Causal Mechanism & Transmission Channel** | **Source Evidence** | **Impact on RLV (24410)** | | ------------------------------------ | ----------------------------------------------- | ------------------- | ------------------------- | | **Rising Insurance Premiums** (Home Warranty, PI) | **Mechanism:** Record-high non-completion claims 5 force insurers to raise premiums 25 for *all* developers. | **Evidence:** 4 | **Impact:** Direct, non-negotiable increase in project hard costs, reducing the residual. | | **Subcontractor Risk Pricing** | **Mechanism:** "Domino effect" 13 and 0% creditor payouts 16 force subcontractors to price in main contractor default risk. | **Evidence:** 6 | **Impact:** Inflates all bids/tenders; systemic cost increase passed to developer, reducing the residual. | | **Project Delay & Re-engagement Costs** | **Mechanism:** Collapse causes immediate project delays 20, quantified at up to +$100k/home 7, plus re-tendering in an inflated market. | **Evidence:** 7 | **Impact:** Increases cost, finance/holding costs, and required contingency buffers, reducing the residual. | 5Sentiment Impact (Codex 24300) #### Direct Link: Insolvency and "Low Confidence" Industry body analysis from 2024-2025 explicitly links the "insolvency trends" identified in the previous section to the "low confidence" that defines the negative reading for Codex 24300. A 2024/2025 report from Infrastructure Australia explicitly states its analysis includes "productivity and **insolvency trends**" which are supplemented by its "2024 Industry Confidence Survey." The definitive finding from this pairing is "**low confidence on capacity to deliver**".9 This is mirrored by the UDIA's March 2025 "State of the Land Report," which cites "significant risks and uncertainty in the market" as the direct cause for "decade lows" in build-to-rent supply.35 It further states, "While **low confidence** at the start of a cycle is typical, overvalued land prices are not common".35 This directly links low professional confidence to the non-viable project feasibilities caused by the cost crisis detailed above. The negative reading for the APN Sentiment Index (24300) is a direct, documented *response* from the professional sector to the "significant risks"35 and "insolvency trends"9 in the market. #### Quantified Sentiment Indicators (Q3/Q4 2025) Q3/Q4 2025 data reveals a critical "sentiment disconnect" between the general economy and the construction sector. This proves the negative reading is sector-specific and not tied to broader macro-economic performance. A CreditorWatch survey from September 2025 shows *general* business optimism is high and improving, with 76% of all decision-makers "optimistic about growth".8 However, data specific to the construction and property sector shows the precise opposite. A 2025 report shows **59% of builders** predict the sector will *deteriorate*.36 A RICS survey from early 2025 found the *top* concern holding back activity (cited by 53% of respondents) was "cost pressures and financial constraints"38, a direct reference to the RLV Gap crisis detailed above. The most significant hard-data proxy for the APN Sentiment Index is from the **September 2025 NAB Monthly Business Survey**. While general confidence held firm, the survey noted that for the *construction industry* specifically, "forward orders slipped into negative".10 This is the most powerful indicator. "Negative forward orders" are not a vague feeling of pessimism; they are a hard-data, behavioural response by professionals who, due to the cost crisis detailed above, have such low confidence in the *viability* of new projects that they are not bidding on them. #### Table 5.1: APN Professional Sentiment Index™ — Key Indicators (Q3/Q4 2025) | **Sentiment Indicator (Codex 24300 Proxy)** | **Metric / Data Point (Q3/Q4 2025)** | **Source** | **Analytic Relevance (The "Why")** | | ------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------ | ---------- | ---------------------------------- | | **Sector-Specific Outlook** | **Metric:** 59% of builders predict sector deterioration. | **Source:** 36 | **Relevance:** Direct measure of "negative outlook" and "low confidence." | | **Key Sector Constraint** | **Metric:** 53% of professionals cite "cost pressures and financial constraints" as top concern. | **Source:** 38 | **Relevance:** Directly links low sentiment to the RLV/cost crisis detailed above. | | **Forward Pipeline (Lead Indicator)** | **Metric:** Construction "forward orders slipped into negative." | **Source:** 10 (NAB, Sept 2025) | **Relevance:** Hard data proxy for low confidence in future project viability. The most valuable indicator. | | **Market Uncertainty (Qualitative)** | **Metric:** "significant risks and uncertainty in the market." | **Source:** 35 (UDIA, 2025) | **Relevance:** Direct qualitative validation of "high uncertainty" from a key industry body. | 6Strategic Recommendations for APN #### Recommendation: Refinement of RLV Gap Model (24410) The core RLV calculation, RLV = GDV − Costs22, assumes "Costs" is a variable that can be forecast with reasonable accuracy. The analysis in this brief proves that this assumption is broken. The "Costs" variable now contains a highly volatile, systemic, and non-linear "Insolvency Risk Premium." It is recommended that the RLV Gap Model (24410) be updated to treat this risk premium as a separate, explicit variable. - **Proposed Model:** RLV = GDV - (Base_Costs + Finance_Costs + Insolvency_Risk_Premium) The variable should be modelled as a composite index, using weighted lead indicators identified in this report: - **Insurer Pricing:** Track the Y-o-Y percentage change in Home Warranty (e.g., QBCC claims data 5) and PI insurance premiums.25 - **Subcontractor Distress:** Track the 12-month rolling *volume* of small-firm (e.g., sub-5 employee) insolvencies.3 - **Supply Chain Risk:** Track B2B trade payment default rates within the construction sector.19 This change evolves the RLV model from a static cost-estimation tool to a dynamic risk-adjusted one. It directly incorporates the insolvency-trend and cost-impact findings above into 24410, allowing APN to more accurately predict which projects will become "marginal"33 and thus more accurately quantify the *true* RLV Gap. #### Recommendation: Re-Weighting the APN Professional Sentiment Index™ (Codex 24300) The sentiment analysis above shows a critical "disconnect"8 between general business optimism and construction-specific pessimism. A sentiment index (24300) that overweights generic "business confidence" will miss this acute, sector-specific negative signal. It is recommended that the Professional Sentiment Index™ (24300) be re-weighted to de-emphasise generic confidence metrics and *increase the weighting* of sector-specific, hard-data *lead indicators*. - Forward Orders 10: This should be the primary weighted indicator. It is not "sentiment"; it is *commitment*. Negative forward orders are a direct expression of "low confidence" in project viability (per the RLV Gap analysis above) and a lead indicator of a future supply collapse. - Access to Finance / Credit Conditions 8: This is a proxy for *lender* sentiment. When "access to credit remains a major challenge" 8 despite high optimism, it shows that capital providers, the ultimate arbiters of viability, share the negative outlook. This refinement makes Codex 24300 less of a lagging "how do you feel" index and more of a *predictive* tool. The fact that 59% of builders *predict* deterioration36 and are *not* bidding on new work10 is the signal. This signal is rooted in the cost crisis detailed in the RLV Gap analysis above. By re-weighting, the Sentiment Index will more accurately capture the *impact* of the RLV Gap on professional behaviour. 7Works Cited - Developer Collapse In Queensland: Lessons For Property Lawyers And Financiers, accessed November 2025, [https://ensurelegal.com.au/developer-collapse-in-queensland-lessons-for-property-lawyers-and-financiers/](https://ensurelegal.com.au/developer-collapse-in-queensland-lessons-for-property-lawyers-and-financiers/) - Building Company Insolvencies in Australia (May 2023 to May 2025), accessed November 2025, [https://www.forwardpathadvisory.com.au/2025/05/30/building-company-insolvencies-in-australia-may-2023-to-may-2025/](https://www.forwardpathadvisory.com.au/2025/05/30/building-company-insolvencies-in-australia-may-2023-to-may-2025/) - Construction Insolvency Trends and Financial Health of ... - Equifax, accessed November 2025, [https://www.equifax.com.au/knowledge-hub/risk-solutions/construction-insolvency-trends-and-financial-health-construction-businesses](https://www.equifax.com.au/knowledge-hub/risk-solutions/construction-insolvency-trends-and-financial-health-construction-businesses) - CONSTRUCTION MARKET UPDATE - RLB, accessed November 2025, [https://www.rlb.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/1/2025/07/RLB-Australia-Market-Intelligence-Update_Q2-2025.pdf](https://www.rlb.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/1/2025/07/RLB-Australia-Market-Intelligence-Update_Q2-2025.pdf) - Queensland's Builder Failures Cost Homeowners Record $88.7 Million in 2024, accessed November 2025, [https://foresighthomeplanning.com.au/queensland-builders-record-non-completions/](https://foresighthomeplanning.com.au/queensland-builders-record-non-completions/) - Interim report - Opportunities to improve productivity of the construction industry, accessed November 2025, [https://www.qpc.qld.gov.au/docs/construction-productivity/Interim%20Report%20-%20Opportunities%20to%20improve%20productivity%20of%20the%20construction%20industry.pdf](https://www.qpc.qld.gov.au/docs/construction-productivity/Interim%20Report%20-%20Opportunities%20to%20improve%20productivity%20of%20the%20construction%20industry.pdf) - Hansard Daily: Legislative Assembly - Wednesday, October 15 2025 - Parliament of Western Australia, accessed November 2025, [https://www.parliament.wa.gov.au/hansard/daily/lh/2025-10-15/25?sid=eb6d00fddce941d993](https://www.parliament.wa.gov.au/hansard/daily/lh/2025-10-15/25?sid=eb6d00fddce941d993) - CreditorWatch: Three-quarters of businesses are optimistic, but here's what they're not telling you | BIIA.com, accessed November 2025, [https://www.biia.com/creditorwatch-three-quarters-of-businesses-are-optimistic-but-heres-what-theyre-not-telling-you/](https://www.biia.com/creditorwatch-three-quarters-of-businesses-are-optimistic-but-heres-what-theyre-not-telling-you/) - Infrastructure Australia: Home, accessed November 2025, [https://www.infrastructureaustralia.gov.au/](https://www.infrastructureaustralia.gov.au/) - NAB Monthly Business Survey, September 2025 - NAB News, accessed November 2025, [https://news.nab.com.au/news/nab-monthly-business-survey--september-2025-](https://news.nab.com.au/news/nab-monthly-business-survey--september-2025-) - Bundamba Property Holdings Pty Ltd 161 629 009 | Winding Up Application - Published Notices, accessed November 2025, [https://publishednotices.asic.gov.au/browsesearch-notices/notice-details/Bundamba-Property-Holdings-Pty-Ltd-161629009/a9f675dc-88da-41c3-beb4-24007c9a51ca](https://publishednotices.asic.gov.au/browsesearch-notices/notice-details/Bundamba-Property-Holdings-Pty-Ltd-161629009/a9f675dc-88da-41c3-beb4-24007c9a51ca) - Bundamba Property Holdings Pty Ltd 161 629 009 | Court Liquidation | Appointment | Select One | Published : 18/06/2025 | ASIC Notice Details, accessed November 2025, [https://publishednotices.asic.gov.au/browsesearch-notices/notice-details/Bundamba-Property-Holdings-Pty-Ltd-161629009/7686c001-7e73-417d-bbe0-f05d6661d884](https://publishednotices.asic.gov.au/browsesearch-notices/notice-details/Bundamba-Property-Holdings-Pty-Ltd-161629009/7686c001-7e73-417d-bbe0-f05d6661d884) - Construction News quotes David Savage on the latest round of administration statistics in the construction sector - Charles Russell Speechlys, accessed November 2025, [https://www.charlesrussellspeechlys.com/en/news-and-events/in-the-press/2025/november/construction-news-quotes-david-savage-on-the-latest-round-of-administration-statistics-in-the-construction-sector/](https://www.charlesrussellspeechlys.com/en/news-and-events/in-the-press/2025/november/construction-news-quotes-david-savage-on-the-latest-round-of-administration-statistics-in-the-construction-sector/) - Construction Insolvency | Peninsula AU, accessed November 2025, [https://peninsulagrouplimited.com.au/resources/blog/whats-causing-the-high-levels-of-construction-insolvency](https://peninsulagrouplimited.com.au/resources/blog/whats-causing-the-high-levels-of-construction-insolvency) - Solid as steel: the insolvency implications of rig... - Clayton Utz, accessed November 2025, [https://www.claytonutz.com/toolkits/from-red-to-black-2025/solid-as-steel-the-insolvency-implications-of-rigorous-reforms-to-victorias-building-laws](https://www.claytonutz.com/toolkits/from-red-to-black-2025/solid-as-steel-the-insolvency-implications-of-rigorous-reforms-to-victorias-building-laws) - 4.3 Focus Topic: The Recent Increase in Company Insolvencies and its Implications for Financial Stability - Reserve Bank of Australia, accessed November 2025, [https://www.rba.gov.au/publications/fsr/2025/apr/focus-topic-the-recent-increase-in-company-insolvencies-and-its-implications-for-financial-stability.html](https://www.rba.gov.au/publications/fsr/2025/apr/focus-topic-the-recent-increase-in-company-insolvencies-and-its-implications-for-financial-stability.html) - Business Risk Monitor | CreditorWatch, accessed November 2025, [https://creditorwatch.com.au/businessriskmonitor/](https://creditorwatch.com.au/businessriskmonitor/) - Insolvencies still high but off the boil; One in 10 hospitality businesses close in the past year, accessed November 2025, [https://creditorwatch.com.au/insolvencies-still-high-but-off-the-boil-one-in-10-hospitality-businesses-close-in-the-past-year/](https://creditorwatch.com.au/insolvencies-still-high-but-off-the-boil-one-in-10-hospitality-businesses-close-in-the-past-year/) - B2B invoice defaults jump in July; CreditorWatch data shows shifting insolvency landscape, accessed November 2025, [https://www.drinksassociation.com.au/news?Article=creditorwatch-business-risk-index-july-2025](https://www.drinksassociation.com.au/news?Article=creditorwatch-business-risk-index-july-2025) - project #80: why are insolvencies so high in the - residential construction industry and what can be done about it? - final report - Building 4.0 CRC, accessed November 2025, [https://building4pointzero.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/CRC80_Project-Report_Final-Version-for-publication.pdf](https://building4pointzero.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/CRC80_Project-Report_Final-Version-for-publication.pdf) - Blog: In Plain English Five development land valuation terms - Savills, accessed November 2025, [https://www.savills.com.au/blog/article/312053-1/residential-property/in-plain-english-five-development-land-valuation-terms.aspx](https://www.savills.com.au/blog/article/312053-1/residential-property/in-plain-english-five-development-land-valuation-terms.aspx) - Land price risk: a regime-based approach - asset mechanics, accessed November 2025, [https://assetmechanics.org/insights/land-price-regime-risk/](https://assetmechanics.org/insights/land-price-regime-risk/) - Hundreds of claims lodged as collapsed builder fallout continues - Insurance News, accessed November 2025, [https://www.insurancenews.com.au/daily/hundreds-of-claims-lodged-as-collapsed-builder-fallout-continues](https://www.insurancenews.com.au/daily/hundreds-of-claims-lodged-as-collapsed-builder-fallout-continues) - Construction Professionals Insurance Market Update: January 2025 - Bellrock Advisory, accessed November 2025, [https://bellrockadvisory.com/construction-professionals-insurance-market-update-january-2025/](https://bellrockadvisory.com/construction-professionals-insurance-market-update-january-2025/) - Construction in 2025: Emerging Risks & Solutions | CBIZ, accessed November 2025, [https://www.cbiz.com/insights/article/construction-in-2025-emerging-risks-solutions](https://www.cbiz.com/insights/article/construction-in-2025-emerging-risks-solutions) - Construction Professional Indemnity Insurance: 2025 market snapshot - Lockton, accessed November 2025, [https://global.lockton.com/gb/en/news-insights/construction-professional-indemnity-insurance-2025-market-snapshot](https://global.lockton.com/gb/en/news-insights/construction-professional-indemnity-insurance-2025-market-snapshot) - Construction: Insurance sector insights 2025 - Browne Jacobson LLP, accessed November 2025, [https://www.brownejacobson.com/insights/insurance-insights-2025/construction](https://www.brownejacobson.com/insights/insurance-insights-2025/construction) - 2025 Construction Insurance Law - A year in review, accessed November 2025, [https://www.kennedyslaw.com/en/thought-leadership/article/2025/2025-construction-insurance-law-a-year-in-review/](https://www.kennedyslaw.com/en/thought-leadership/article/2025/2025-construction-insurance-law-a-year-in-review/) - The Changing Landscape of Property Development … in the words of Andrew Opperman - Mitchell Brandtman, accessed November 2025, [https://www.mitbrand.com/the-changing-landscape-of-property-development-in-the-words-of-andrew-opperman/](https://www.mitbrand.com/the-changing-landscape-of-property-development-in-the-words-of-andrew-opperman/) - Reintroduction of Sydney Water DSP Developer Charges - UDIA NSW, accessed November 2025, [https://www.udiansw.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/23.07-UDIA-submission-to-Sydney-Water-DSPs-.pdf](https://www.udiansw.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/23.07-UDIA-submission-to-Sydney-Water-DSPs-.pdf) - re: draft western sydney regional affordable rental housing contribution scheme - udia nsw, accessed November 2025, [https://www.udiansw.com.au/submission/draft-western-sydney-regional-affordable-rental-housing-contribution-scheme/udia-sub_affordablehousinglevy/](https://www.udiansw.com.au/submission/draft-western-sydney-regional-affordable-rental-housing-contribution-scheme/udia-sub_affordablehousinglevy/) - Agenda of Ordinary Council Meeting - Tuesday, 13 February 2024, accessed November 2025, [https://www.campbelltown.nsw.gov.au/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/council-and-councillors/documents/meetings-and-minutes-2024/february-2024/ordinary-meeting-agenda-13-february-2024.pdf](https://www.campbelltown.nsw.gov.au/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/council-and-councillors/documents/meetings-and-minutes-2024/february-2024/ordinary-meeting-agenda-13-february-2024.pdf) - ECONOMIC TESTING - Western Sydney Affordable Housing Contribution Scheme - The Parks - NSW Government, accessed November 2025, [https://theparks.nsw.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Appendix-B-Economic-testing-HillPDA-RARCHS-Exhibition.pdf](https://theparks.nsw.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Appendix-B-Economic-testing-HillPDA-RARCHS-Exhibition.pdf) - Draft Western Sydney Regional Affordable Housing Contribution Scheme | The Parks, accessed November 2025, [https://theparks.nsw.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Draft-Western-SydneyRegional-Affordable-Housing-Contribution-Scheme-V1.pdf](https://theparks.nsw.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Draft-Western-SydneyRegional-Affordable-Housing-Contribution-Scheme-V1.pdf) - UDIA STATE OF THE LAND 2025, accessed November 2025, [https://udia.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/State-Of-The-Land-Report-2025-Final-Report.pdf](https://udia.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/State-Of-The-Land-Report-2025-Final-Report.pdf) - New housing consents stay high but confidence falls - Newstalk ZB, accessed November 2025, [https://www.newstalkzb.co.nz/news/business/builders-face-labour-crisis-as-new-housing-consents-still-surpassing-50-000-a-month/](https://www.newstalkzb.co.nz/news/business/builders-face-labour-crisis-as-new-housing-consents-still-surpassing-50-000-a-month/) - July was a good month for the government But the months ahead look much harder The Greens' self-inflicted damage Three waters - The Hugo Group, accessed November 2025, [https://www.thehugogroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Hugovision-August-5-2022.pdf](https://www.thehugogroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Hugovision-August-5-2022.pdf) - Australia: Construction market holds steady in early 2025 - RICS, accessed November 2025, [https://www.rics.org/news-insights/australia-construction-market-holds-steady-early-2025](https://www.rics.org/news-insights/australia-construction-market-holds-steady-early-2025)