--- title: "APN Research Brief: ACCC Probe into REA Group Pricing Power" url: https://australianproperty.network/apn-research/apn-research-brief-accc-probe-into-rea-group-pricing-power/ date: 2025-10-30 modified: 2026-08-28 lang: en author: "APN Academy" description: "The ACCC's formal investigation into REA Group tests whether the dominant property portal misused its market power to impose steep, sustained price rises on real estate agents and property sellers. This report quantifies REA Group's market dominance, the scale of its price increases, and the profitability gap between the platform and the agency sector it serves." word_count: 3906 --- # APN Research Brief: ACCC Probe into REA Group Pricing Power APN Research — Market Structure & Regulation # ACCC Probe into REA Group Pricing Power This report analyses the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission's formal investigation into REA Group's pricing practices — a compulsory legal probe testing whether the dominant property portal has misused its market power to impose steep, sustained price increases on real estate agents and, ultimately, property sellers. [Back to APN Research →](https://australianproperty.network/apn-research/) 1Executive Summary This report provides a consolidated analysis of the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission's (ACCC) formal investigation into the pricing practices of REA Group Ltd (ASX: REA). The analysis confirms the probe is a material state intervention event, directly challenging the market structure and conduct of Australia's dominant online real estate portal. The investigation, initiated via a compulsory legal notice, focuses on allegations that REA Group has misused its substantial market power by imposing excessive and anti-competitive price increases for its subscription and advertising products. Quantitative analysis validates the market structure as a duopoly heavily skewed in REA Group's favour, with its platform, realestate.com.au, attracting four times the monthly visits of its nearest competitor, Domain, and possessing a market capitalisation more than ten times greater. The investigation was triggered by sustained and significant price hikes, with industry bodies reporting common annual increases of 8-10% and specific instances of up to 30% year-on-year, far exceeding inflation. These costs are passed directly to property sellers through the Vendor Paid Advertising (VPA) model, a system that effectively insulates REA Group from price sensitivity. This dynamic facilitates a "Wealth Funnel," where substantial value is extracted from the fragmented, low-margin real estate agency sector and concentrated within the high-margin digital platform. REA Group's FY2025 EBITDA margin of approximately 58% stands in stark contrast to the average 11.3% profit margin for the Australian Real Estate Services industry. The ACCC's action represents a significant test of Australia's amended competition laws against a domestic digital giant. Potential outcomes range from substantial financial penalties to mandated changes in REA Group's pricing and subscription models. Such intervention would mark a significant increase in the "Regulatory Velocity Multiplier," signalling a new era of regulatory risk for dominant digital platforms in Australia. 2Primary Source Verification: Confirming the ACCC Probe This section establishes the factual and legal basis of the ACCC's investigation into REA Group, confirming it as a significant state intervention event. #### Confirmation and Legal Instrument The existence of a formal investigation is unequivocally confirmed by REA Group. On May 27, 2025, the company issued a public announcement to the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) stating it had received a compulsory s155 Notice from the ACCC.1 The use of a s155 Notice under the *Competition and Consumer Act 2010* (CCA) is a critical indicator of the investigation's gravity. This is not an informal inquiry but a legally binding demand for information, documents, and evidence.3 The ACCC's own guidelines clarify that these powers are crucial to its enforcement role and are utilised when it has "reason to believe" a contravention of the law may have occurred.4 The decision to deploy this compulsory tool from the outset suggests the regulator anticipates a contentious process and is formally gathering evidence, potentially for use in future legal proceedings, confirming the seriousness of the matter.6 #### Scope and Subject of Investigation According to REA Group's disclosure, the s155 Notice specifically requires the company to provide "information regarding certain subscription offerings".1 This focus is corroborated by extensive industry reporting and complaints, which frame the investigation's scope around allegations of "misuse of market dominance," "excessive pricing," and "price gouging".8 The central question is whether REA Group has exploited its dominant market position to impose unreasonable price increases, to the detriment of real estate agents and, ultimately, consumers (property sellers).8 The ACCC has maintained a guarded public stance, in line with its standard procedure for ongoing investigations. However, following REA Group's mandatory disclosure, an ACCC spokesperson issued a formal statement: "Naturally, the ACCC is concerned to ensure there is strong competition in the important real estate sector. As the investigation is ongoing, the ACCC won't comment further at this time. The investigation is at an early stage, and we're yet to form a view".11 While non-committal, the statement's explicit focus on ensuring "strong competition" directly aligns with the core allegations of market power abuse. #### Genesis of the Probe The ACCC's investigation was not initiated spontaneously but was the culmination of sustained industry pressure. The Real Estate Institute of NSW (REINSW) confirmed it had first approached the ACCC with evidence of "dramatically escalating fees" approximately 18 months prior to the public confirmation of the probe.12 This long-term lobbying effort, driven by "ongoing member complaints," provided the regulator with a substantial body of evidence and a clear pattern of conduct regarding REA Group's pricing strategies and market position.12 This extended period of observation allowed the ACCC to assess the conduct within the broader context of its five-year Digital Platform Services Inquiry (2020-2025), likely concluding that the market was not self-correcting and that direct intervention was warranted.15 3Market Dominance Quantification This section provides the quantitative and qualitative data defining REA Group's market position as a dominant firm within an imbalanced duopoly. This market structure is the foundation upon which the ACCC's allegations of misuse of market power are built. #### Quantitative Market Share Analysis REA Group's primary platform, realestate.com.au, exhibits overwhelming market dominance across key metrics of user engagement and financial scale, establishing a clear duopoly with a subordinate competitor, Domain. - **Audience and Engagement:** REA Group's platform attracts 132.2 million average monthly visits, a figure four times higher than Domain.17 The platform commands a unique monthly audience of 12.1 to 12.3 million people.2 A critical indicator of its network effect is the 6.4 million users who visit realestate.com.au *exclusively* each month, representing a significant barrier to entry for any competitor.1 Furthermore, REA Group reported increasing its audience lead over Domain by 17% in FY2025, demonstrating its strengthening market position.18 - **Financial Scale:** The financial disparity between the two main market participants is stark. As of mid-2025, REA Group's market capitalisation ranged from A$29.36 billion to A$32 billion.20 In contrast, Domain Holdings' market capitalisation was approximately A$2.8 billion, making REA Group more than ten times larger by market value.21 This financial gulf is reflected in operational revenue, where REA generates approximately four times the revenue of Domain from the core residential listings business.24 | **Metric** | **REA Group** | **Domain Holdings** | **Dominance Multiple (REA vs. Domain)** | **Source(s)** | | ---------- | ------------- | ------------------- | --------------------------------------- | ------------- | | Market Capitalisation (approx.) | A$29.4B - A$32B | A$2.8B | ~$10.5x - 11.4x | 20 | | FY2025 Group Revenue | A$1.7B | A$391M (FY24) | ~$4.3x | [25, 26] | | Average Monthly Visits | 132.2M | ~$33M | ~$4.0x | [17, 27] | | Exclusive Monthly Audience | 6.4M | N/A | N/A | 1 | | Revenue Multiple (Residential) | ~$4x | 1x | 4.0x | 24 | #### Qualitative Analysis of 'Substantial Market Power' Under Section 46 of Australia's *Competition and Consumer Act 2010* (CCA), a firm possesses "substantial market power" if it can act with a degree of freedom from competitive constraint, often demonstrated by the ability to profitably raise prices above competitive levels.28 The law prohibits such a firm from engaging in conduct that has the purpose, effect, or likely effect of substantially lessening competition.30 Independent expert analysis consistently defines REA Group's position in these terms. Morningstar analysts assign REA a "wide moat" based on powerful "network effects" and a "first-mover advantage," describing the market as an "effective duopoly" in which REA is the "dominant platform".31 This assessment is implicitly supported by former ACCC Chair Rod Sims, who, prior to the current probe, stated that REA's conduct was "well worth considering" for potential anti-competitive behavior.32 The ACCC itself has previously signalled concern, noting in a 2024 merger review that an acquisition could "extend REA Group's already strong position".33 The network effect is the primary mechanism through which this market power is exercised. Because a critical mass of buyers, including 6.4 million exclusive users, are on realestate.com.au, agents and vendors perceive listing on the platform as non-negotiable.1 This creates a captive customer base with minimal bargaining power, rendering them price-takers and enabling REA to implement price increases without significant customer churn. A pivotal market development is the acquisition of Domain by the well-capitalized U.S. firm CoStar Group in August 2025.34 CoStar's CEO, Andy Florance, has publicly declared his intent to disrupt REA's dominance, stating, "Agents and vendors are being squeezed by legacy models that raise prices without raising value. That ends here".35 This event introduces a future competitive dynamic that REA Group may use in its defense to the ACCC, arguing that the market is poised for increased competition, thereby making regulatory intervention unnecessary. 4Price Increases & VPA Impact (The Wealth Funnel) This section quantifies the scale of REA Group's price increases and demonstrates their direct transmission to property sellers via the Vendor Paid Advertising (VPA) model, providing the primary evidence for the "Wealth Funnel" mechanism. #### Verification of Agent Fee Increases The ACCC probe is predicated on numerous industry reports of sustained and substantial price increases for REA Group's advertising products. - **Year-on-Year Increases:** The claim of increases "up to 30% YoY" is directly substantiated by Tim McKibbin, CEO of the Real Estate Institute of NSW (REINSW). He stated, "One agent this week claimed the fees charged by REA, which are borne by his vendors, increased by 30 per cent in a year".10 REINSW further reports that annual increases "well above the CPI, often in the realm of 10%" are commonplace.13 Local agents in Casey, Victoria, report similar annual increases of "about seven to eight per cent".37 - **Exceptional Hikes:** An *Australian Financial Review* report alleges that some of REA Group's agent subscription prices were raised by as much as 78% in FY2025, a move that is said to have been a direct catalyst for the ACCC investigation.38 - **Long-Term Escalation:** The price escalation is a long-term trend. Multiple sources document a more than 5,000% increase over approximately 15 years, with the cost of a top-tier listing rising from around A$75 in 2009 to over A$4,000 or A$5,000 in major metropolitan areas by 2025.1 | **Timeframe** | **Reported Increase** | **Product / Context** | **Source(s)** | | ------------- | --------------------- | --------------------- | ------------- | | Annual (Common) | 8% - 10% | General agent fees, well above CPI | 12 | | Annual (Specific Claim) | 30% | Fees charged to an agent for one year | 10 | | FY2025 | Up to 78% | Agent subscription prices | 38 | | 2021-2024 (3-Year Period) | ~30% | Prices for listings on REA and Domain | 11 | | 2009-2025 (16-Year Period) | >5,000% (~50x) | Top-tier listing packages | [1, 10] | #### Direct Linkage to Vendor Paid Advertising (VPA) The financial impact of these price increases is transferred directly to consumers through Australia's unique VPA model, which is described as "rare globally".41 In this system, the property seller (the vendor) pays for marketing costs as a separate, itemised expense, rather than having them absorbed into the agent's commission fee, which is common practice in the US and Europe.42 This structure creates a direct pass-through mechanism. As former REA Group CEO Simon Baker explained, the model is advantageous for the portal because the agents who are its direct customers are not the ones ultimately paying the bill.41 Industry bodies and agents confirm this reality, stating that agents are "squeezed" by the price hikes and "ultimately it is the sellers who end up footing the bill".1 This dynamic has led to Australia having "the most expensive real estate advertising fees in the world".44 The structure of REA's subscription offerings, particularly "Premiere All" packages, reinforces this pass-through effect. These packages contractually oblige agents to place a high percentage (e.g., 80-90%) of their listings in the most expensive 'Premiere' tier.41 This effectively locks vendors into the premium-priced product, reducing choice and maximising revenue extraction for REA Group. The ACCC's stated focus on "subscription offerings" indicates these specific business models are a central element of the probe.1 5Wealth Extraction Mechanism (The Wealth Funnel) This section provides a comparative economic analysis that quantifies the scale of wealth extraction by contrasting REA Group's high profitability with the significantly lower margins of the real estate agency sector it serves. This analysis validates the "Wealth Funnel" thesis. #### Profitability and Margin Analysis of REA Group REA Group's financial performance is characteristic of a dominant digital platform with strong pricing power and low marginal costs. The company's FY2025 results were driven predominantly by price increases ("yield growth"), not an increase in transaction volume. - **FY2025 Financial Performance:** - **Group Revenue:** A$1.7 billion, an increase of 15% year-on-year.26 - **EBITDA:** A$969 million, an increase of 18% year-on-year.26 - **Net Profit:** A$564 million, an increase of 23% year-on-year.26 - **Revenue Driver:** The company's residential "buy" revenue grew primarily due to a 14% increase in yield, while national listing volumes rose by only 1%.17 This data point explicitly confirms that price and product mix changes, not market expansion, are the core of its revenue growth strategy. - **Profit Margins:** - **EBITDA Margin:** For FY2025, REA Group's EBITDA margin was approximately 58%.48 - **Net Profit Margin:** The net profit margin for FY2025 was approximately 33.8%.26 These high margins are not reflective of a high cost of service; the cost to host a digital listing is very low, but is a direct result of the pricing power afforded by its dominant market position.44 #### Profitability Analysis of Australian Real Estate Agencies The Australian Real Estate Services industry (IBISWorld industry code L6720), which comprises REA Group's primary customer base, operates on substantially lower profit margins. - **Industry-Wide Financials (2024-25):** - **Total Industry Revenue:** A$30.4 billion.51 - **Total Industry Profit:** A$3.4 billion.51 - **Average Industry Profit Margin:** 11.3%.51 The stark contrast in profitability is illustrated in the table below. | **Metric** | **REA Group (FY2025)** | **Australian Real Estate Services Industry (2024-25)** | **Source(s)** | | ---------- | ---------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------ | ------------- | | Total Revenue | A$1.7 Billion | A$30.4 Billion | [26, 51] | | Total Profit | A$969 Million (EBITDA) | A$3.4 Billion (Net Profit) | [26, 51] | | **Profit Margin** | **~58% (EBITDA)** | **11.3%** | [48, 51] | This disparity demonstrates a highly efficient extraction of value. Wealth is funnelled from a fragmented, high-overhead, low-margin service industry (real estate agencies) to a highly concentrated, low-marginal-cost, high-margin digital platform (REA Group). Furthermore, REA Group's strategy shows an expansion of this wealth funnel. Having reached a "growth ceiling" in its core advertising market, the company is pursuing vertical integration into adjacent, high-value services such as mortgage broking (Mortgage Choice), property data (PropTrack), and VPA financing (Campaign Agent).52 This strategy allows REA to capture revenue at multiple points of the property transaction lifecycle, deepening its extraction of value from the same underlying economic activity and further entrenching its market power. 6State Intervention & Potential Outcomes (Regulatory Velocity Multiplier) This section analyses the strategic significance of the ACCC's probe as a major state intervention against a dominant digital platform and evaluates the potential outcomes and their impact on the regulatory landscape. #### Significance as State Intervention The ACCC's investigation into REA Group is a landmark event in Australian digital platform regulation. It occurs within the context of the ACCC's five-year Digital Platform Services Inquiry (DPSI), which concluded in March 2025 and recommended sweeping reforms, including a new ex-ante competition regime with mandatory codes of conduct for "designated" platforms.54 This probe can be seen as a direct application of the principles and concerns identified in that broader inquiry. The significance is amplified by commentary from influential figures. Former ACCC Chair Rod Sims publicly stated that REA's conduct was "well worth considering" under competition law, even suggesting that a previously rejected application for agents to collectively bargain against the portal might now succeed.32 This signals a fundamental shift in regulatory appetite toward challenging the conduct of dominant firms. The political environment is also charged, with the Australian Greens labelling REA's alleged behaviour an "outrageous abuse of market power" and calling for new price-gouging legislation.32 This combination of regulatory machinery, expert opinion, and political pressure elevates the probe to a critical test case. #### Potential Outcomes and Regulatory Impact Should the ACCC conclude that REA Group has misused its substantial market power in contravention of Section 46 of the CCA, a range of enforcement actions are possible. The outcome of this test case for the ACCC's amended "effects test" powers will have profound implications for the "Regulatory Velocity Multiplier." - **Substantial Fines:** The CCA allows for significant pecuniary penalties. The maximum fine for a corporation is the greater of A$10 million, three times the value of the benefit derived from the illegal conduct, or 10% of annual turnover during the breach period.30 For REA Group, this could easily translate into a penalty in the hundreds of millions of dollars. - **Mandated Business Practice Changes:** Beyond fines, the ACCC can seek court-enforceable undertakings to alter REA's conduct. This is the most impactful potential outcome and could include dismantling restrictive subscription models like "Premiere All," imposing caps on annual price increases (a form of price control), or mandating greater transparency and choice for agents and vendors. - **Dismissal of Case:** The ACCC may find insufficient evidence for a breach, or REA Group could successfully argue that its pricing reflects the value of its service and that the market is sufficiently competitive, particularly with the recent entry of a strengthened competitor in CoStar-owned Domain. The table below outlines the strategic impact of these potential outcomes. | **Potential Outcome** | **Description** | **Impact on REA Group** | **Impact on Regulatory Velocity Multiplier** | | --------------------- | --------------- | ----------------------- | -------------------------------------------- | | **1. Substantial Fines & Mandated Pricing Changes** | ACCC proves misuse of market power; court imposes a large fine and orders changes to subscription models and/or price caps. | Severe financial and operational impact. Forced restructuring of core revenue model, limiting future pricing power. | **Significant Increase.** Establishes a major precedent for direct regulatory intervention in the business models of dominant digital platforms. Signals a new era of heightened enforcement and risk. | | **2. Substantial Fines Only** | ACCC proves misuse of market power; court imposes a large fine but does not mandate structural changes to business practices. | Significant one-off financial impact and reputational damage. Core business model and pricing power remain intact, albeit with a need for greater caution. | **Confirmation.** Confirms the ACCC's power to penalise but suggests a high bar for interfering with business models. The "Wealth Funnel" is taxed but not dismantled. | | **3. Dismissal of Case / No Action** | ACCC fails to prove its case, or REA successfully defends its conduct. The investigation is closed with no adverse findings. | Major strategic victory. Vindicates current business model and pricing power. Shareholder confidence likely to surge. | **Confirmation of Platform Immunity.** Reinforces the difficulty of challenging dominant firms under existing laws, even post-amendment. Signals that market forces are the preferred remedy. | This investigation serves as a critical test of the ACCC's strengthened powers under the amended Section 46 of the CCA, which now includes an "effects test".30 A successful prosecution against a major digital platform like REA Group would set a powerful precedent, fundamentally recalibrating the regulatory risk for all dominant firms in the Australian market and signalling a definitive end to any perceived platform immunity. 7Works Cited - REA Group Under Investigation From ACCC Over Market Power And Pricing, accessed October 2025, [https://www.onlinemarketplaces.com/articles/rea-group-under-investigation-from-accc-over-market-power-and-pricing/](https://www.onlinemarketplaces.com/articles/rea-group-under-investigation-from-accc-over-market-power-and-pricing/) - For personal use only - ASX, accessed October 2025, [https://announcements.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20250527/pdf/06k4qx1ylgtbr6.pdf](https://announcements.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20250527/pdf/06k4qx1ylgtbr6.pdf) - ACCC launch investigation…into realestate.com.au - Harris Partners, accessed October 2025, [https://harrispartners.com.au/investing/accc-launch-investigationinto-realestate-com-au/](https://harrispartners.com.au/investing/accc-launch-investigationinto-realestate-com-au/) - ACCC guidelines— Use of section 155 powers, accessed October 2025, [https://www.accc.gov.au/system/files/Guidelines-Use%20of%20section%20155%20powers.pdf](https://www.accc.gov.au/system/files/Guidelines-Use%20of%20section%20155%20powers.pdf) - Section 155 notices | ACCC, accessed October 2025, [https://www.accc.gov.au/system/files/Section-155-notices-FA.pdf](https://www.accc.gov.au/system/files/Section-155-notices-FA.pdf) - ACCC Guidance on Its Information Gathering - Jones Day, accessed October 2025, [https://www.jonesday.com/en/insights/2019/08/accc-guidance-on-its-information-gathering](https://www.jonesday.com/en/insights/2019/08/accc-guidance-on-its-information-gathering) - Response to speculation - REA Group Ltd (ASX:REA) - Listcorp., accessed October 2025, [https://www.listcorp.com/asx/rea/rea-group/news/response-to-speculation-3194382.html](https://www.listcorp.com/asx/rea/rea-group/news/response-to-speculation-3194382.html) - ACCC Probes REA Group Over Alleged Price Hikes, Shares Slip | Articles based on What's Trending today in ASX Australian Securities Exchange - Kapitales Research Australia, accessed October 2025, [https://www.kapitales.com.au/articles/trending/accc-probes-rea-group-over-alleged-price-hikes-shares-slip](https://www.kapitales.com.au/articles/trending/accc-probes-rea-group-over-alleged-price-hikes-shares-slip) - ACCC Launches Preliminary Inquiry Into REA Group Over Alleged Price Gouging, accessed October 2025, [https://www.pymnts.com/cpi-posts/accc-launches-preliminary-inquiry-into-rea-group-over-alleged-price-gouging/](https://www.pymnts.com/cpi-posts/accc-launches-preliminary-inquiry-into-rea-group-over-alleged-price-gouging/) - Property listings giant REA Group under ACCC investigation over pricing concerns, accessed October 2025, [https://www.apimagazine.com.au/news/article/property-listings-giant-rea-group-under-accc-investigation-over-pricing-concerns](https://www.apimagazine.com.au/news/article/property-listings-giant-rea-group-under-accc-investigation-over-pricing-concerns) - Selling a house in Australia is expensive. The ACCC is investigating one reason why | Real estate | The Guardian, accessed October 2025, [https://www.theguardian.com/business/2025/may/29/realestate-com-au-accc-investigating-news-corp-rea-group](https://www.theguardian.com/business/2025/may/29/realestate-com-au-accc-investigating-news-corp-rea-group) - REA Pricing Model Under Scrutiny after REINSW Raise Concerns to the ACCC, accessed October 2025, [https://www.reinsw.com.au/Web/News/REINSW_Updates/2025/may/rea-pricing-model-under-scrutiney-reinsw-accc](https://www.reinsw.com.au/Web/News/REINSW_Updates/2025/may/rea-pricing-model-under-scrutiney-reinsw-accc) - REINSW WELCOMES ACCC PROBE INTO REA GROUP, accessed October 2025, [https://reinsw.com.au/Web/News/Media_Releases/2025/May/reinsw-welcomes-accc-probe-into-rea-group](https://reinsw.com.au/Web/News/Media_Releases/2025/May/reinsw-welcomes-accc-probe-into-rea-group) - Lack of advertising competition pushing up prices for all, accessed October 2025, [https://www.apimagazine.com.au/news/article/lack-of-advertising-competition-pushing-up-prices-for-all](https://www.apimagazine.com.au/news/article/lack-of-advertising-competition-pushing-up-prices-for-all) - Digital platform services inquiry 2020-2025 - Australian Competition Law, accessed October 2025, [https://www.australiancompetitionlaw.info/reports/digital-platform-services-inquiry](https://www.australiancompetitionlaw.info/reports/digital-platform-services-inquiry) - Digital platform services inquiry 2020-25 - ACCC, accessed October 2025, [https://www.accc.gov.au/inquiries-and-consultations/finalised-inquiries/digital-platform-services-inquiry-2020-25](https://www.accc.gov.au/inquiries-and-consultations/finalised-inquiries/digital-platform-services-inquiry-2020-25) - REA Group's Australian Revenue Surges 14% In FY25 - B&T, accessed October 2025, [https://www.bandt.com.au/rea-groups-australian-revenue-surges-14-in-fy25/](https://www.bandt.com.au/rea-groups-australian-revenue-surges-14-in-fy25/) - 1 magnificent ASX stock down 19% to buy and hold forever - Motley Fool, accessed October 2025, [https://www.fool.com.au/2025/10/27/1-magnificent-asx-stock-down-19-to-buy-and-hold-forever/](https://www.fool.com.au/2025/10/27/1-magnificent-asx-stock-down-19-to-buy-and-hold-forever/) - ASX Announcement 6 August 2025 REA Group delivers an excellent FY25 result Financial highlights from core operations1 compared t, accessed October 2025, [https://www.belldirect.com.au/smarter/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/REA-Group-Results.pdf](https://www.belldirect.com.au/smarter/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/REA-Group-Results.pdf) - ACCC probes into the REA Group over alleged overcharging - Real Estate Business, accessed October 2025, [https://www.realestatebusiness.com.au/industry/29966-accc-probes-into-the-rea-group-over-alleged-overcharging](https://www.realestatebusiness.com.au/industry/29966-accc-probes-into-the-rea-group-over-alleged-overcharging) - REA vs DHG - Compare price, market cap & more - Stake, accessed October 2025, [https://hellostake.com/au/invest/aus/compare/rea-vs-dhg](https://hellostake.com/au/invest/aus/compare/rea-vs-dhg) - ACCC Investigates REA Group for Dominance and Soaring Fees - KOSEC, accessed October 2025, [https://kosec.com.au/rea-group-faces-accc-probe-over-listing-fee-hikes-and-market-power/](https://kosec.com.au/rea-group-faces-accc-probe-over-listing-fee-hikes-and-market-power/) - Domain Holdings Australia | DHG - Market Capitalization - Trading Economics, accessed October 2025, [https://tradingeconomics.com/dhg:au:market-capitalization](https://tradingeconomics.com/dhg:au:market-capitalization) - Australia's REA Group vs. Domain — Mike DelPrete - Real Estate Tech Strategist, accessed October 2025, [https://www.mikedp.com/articles/2018/3/20/global-insights-australias-rea-group-vs-domain](https://www.mikedp.com/articles/2018/3/20/global-insights-australias-rea-group-vs-domain) - REA Group FY2025: Double-digit growth in revenue, EBITDA, accessed October 2025, [https://aimgroup.com/2025/08/06/rea-group-fy2025-results-record-revenue-and-profits-but-still-no-ceo/](https://aimgroup.com/2025/08/06/rea-group-fy2025-results-record-revenue-and-profits-but-still-no-ceo/) - Substantial market power - ACCC, accessed October 2025, [https://www.accc.gov.au/business/selling-products-and-services/small-business-toolkit/misuse-of-market-power/substantial-market-power](https://www.accc.gov.au/business/selling-products-and-services/small-business-toolkit/misuse-of-market-power/substantial-market-power) - Guidelines on misuse of market power | ACCC, accessed October 2025, [https://www.accc.gov.au/system/files/Updated%20Guidelines%20on%20Misuse%20of%20Market%20Power.pdf](https://www.accc.gov.au/system/files/Updated%20Guidelines%20on%20Misuse%20of%20Market%20Power.pdf) - Misuse of market power - Australian Competition Law, accessed October 2025, [https://www.australiancompetitionlaw.info/law/misuse](https://www.australiancompetitionlaw.info/law/misuse) - Is REA on track with their global ambitions? - Morningstar Australia, accessed October 2025, [https://www.morningstar.com.au/stocks/is-rea-on-track-with-their-global-ambitions](https://www.morningstar.com.au/stocks/is-rea-on-track-with-their-global-ambitions) - Rod Sims says 'worth considering' whether realestate.com.au engaged in anti-competitive practices as Greens blast 'rigged' system - The Guardian, accessed October 2025, [https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2024/sep/20/rod-sims-says-worth-considering-whether-realestatecomau-engaged-in-anti-competitive-practices-as-greens-blast-rigged-system](https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2024/sep/20/rod-sims-says-worth-considering-whether-realestatecomau-engaged-in-anti-competitive-practices-as-greens-blast-rigged-system) - realestate.com.au's proposed acquisition of Dynamic Methods raises potential concerns, accessed October 2025, [https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/realestatecomaus-proposed-acquisition-of-dynamic-methods-raises-potential-concerns](https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/realestatecomaus-proposed-acquisition-of-dynamic-methods-raises-potential-concerns) - Domain shareholders back $3 Billion CoStar takeover - Elite Agent, accessed October 2025, [https://eliteagent.com/domain-shareholders-back-3-billion-costar-takeover/](https://eliteagent.com/domain-shareholders-back-3-billion-costar-takeover/) - CoStar Group Completes Acquisition of Domain, Ushering in a New Era of Innovation for Australia's Property Market, accessed October 2025, [https://www.costargroup.com/press-room/2025/costar-group-completes-acquisition-domain-ushering-new-era-innovation-australias](https://www.costargroup.com/press-room/2025/costar-group-completes-acquisition-domain-ushering-new-era-innovation-australias) - Florance Highlights "Vast Opportunity" As CoStar Group Acquires Domain For $1.92Bn, accessed October 2025, [https://www.onlinemarketplaces.com/articles/costar-acquires-domain-for-1-92bn/](https://www.onlinemarketplaces.com/articles/costar-acquires-domain-for-1-92bn/) - Casey real estate agents slam ad costs as ACCC probes REA Group | Berwick Star News, accessed October 2025, [https://berwicknews.starcommunity.com.au/news/2025-06-13/casey-real-estate-agents-slam-ad-costs-as-accc-probes-rea-group/](https://berwicknews.starcommunity.com.au/news/2025-06-13/casey-real-estate-agents-slam-ad-costs-as-accc-probes-rea-group/) - REA Group watchdog probe triggered by 78% price rise, accessed October 2025, [https://aimgroup.com/2025/05/29/rea-group-watchdog-probe-triggered-by-78-price-rise/](https://aimgroup.com/2025/05/29/rea-group-watchdog-probe-triggered-by-78-price-rise/) - ACCC Probes REA Group Amid Real Estate Agent Backlash Over 78% Price Hike, accessed October 2025, [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pFZqYO7mq_o](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pFZqYO7mq_o) - 'The bear at the door': estate agents say they fear speaking out about realestate.com.au 'price gouging' | | The Guardian, accessed October 2025, [https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2024/sep/19/the-bear-at-the-door-estate-agents-say-they-fear-speaking-out-about-realestatecomau-price-gouging](https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2024/sep/19/the-bear-at-the-door-estate-agents-say-they-fear-speaking-out-about-realestatecomau-price-gouging) - Why News Corp's realestate.com.au can put fees 'up and up and up', according to ex-CEO, accessed October 2025, [https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2024/sep/23/simon-baker-realestate-com-au-fees-news-corp-ntwnfb](https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2024/sep/23/simon-baker-realestate-com-au-fees-news-corp-ntwnfb) - The "Vendor-Paid" Model in Australia - What's the Big Idea? - Realforce Feeds, accessed October 2025, [https://www.realforce.com/feed/the-vendor-paid-model-in-australia-whats-the-big-idea](https://www.realforce.com/feed/the-vendor-paid-model-in-australia-whats-the-big-idea) - REA Group Ltd - Hyperion Asset Management, accessed October 2025, [https://www.hyperion.com.au/app/uploads/2021/07/REA-AU.pdf](https://www.hyperion.com.au/app/uploads/2021/07/REA-AU.pdf) - Why selling your home is getting more expensive | The Business | ABC NEWS - YouTube, accessed October 2025, [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S2GE4y1rP7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S2GE4y1rP7s) - Australia's real estate industry has pumped $70 million into Homely, but is it playing fair?, accessed October 2025, [https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/australias-real-estate-industry-has-pumped-70m-into-homely-but-is-it-playing-fair/bk273znk4](https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/australias-real-estate-industry-has-pumped-70m-into-homely-but-is-it-playing-fair/bk273znk4) - REA Group's stellar financial year 2025 and record dividends, but… - roger montgomery, accessed October 2025, [https://rogermontgomery.com/rea-groups-stellar-financial-year-2025-and-record-dividends-but/](https://rogermontgomery.com/rea-groups-stellar-financial-year-2025-and-record-dividends-but/) - REA Group FY 2025: Bumper Year Sees 15% Revenue Growth And 23% Net Profit Growth, accessed October 2025, [https://www.onlinemarketplaces.com/articles/rea-group-fy-2025-bumper-year-sees-15-revenue-growth-and-23-net-profit-growth/](https://www.onlinemarketplaces.com/articles/rea-group-fy-2025-bumper-year-sees-15-revenue-growth-and-23-net-profit-growth/) - For personal use only - ASX, accessed October 2025, [https://announcements.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20250806/pdf/06mkwwcvs4r9qb.pdf](https://announcements.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20250806/pdf/06mkwwcvs4r9qb.pdf) - REA Group Investor and Analyst Presentation FY25 - Listcorp, accessed October 2025, [https://www.listcorp.com/asx/rea/rea-group/news/rea-group-investor-and-analyst-presentation-fy25-3223090.html](https://www.listcorp.com/asx/rea/rea-group/news/rea-group-investor-and-analyst-presentation-fy25-3223090.html) - REA Group Ltd (REA:REA) - Company Financials - Intelligent Investor, accessed October 2025, [https://www.intelligentinvestor.com.au/shares/asx-rea/rea-group-ltd/financials](https://www.intelligentinvestor.com.au/shares/asx-rea/rea-group-ltd/financials) - Real Estate Services in Australia, accessed October 2025, [https://www.quantumhouse.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/L6720-Real-Estate-Services-in-Australia-Industry-Report-IExpert-1.pdf](https://www.quantumhouse.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/L6720-Real-Estate-Services-in-Australia-Industry-Report-IExpert-1.pdf) - realestate.com.au Pty Ltd - Dynamic Methods Pty Ltd - ACCC, accessed October 2025, [https://www.accc.gov.au/public-registers/mergers-and-acquisitions-registers/public-informal-merger-reviews-register/realestatecomau-pty-ltd-dynamic-methods-pty-ltd](https://www.accc.gov.au/public-registers/mergers-and-acquisitions-registers/public-informal-merger-reviews-register/realestatecomau-pty-ltd-dynamic-methods-pty-ltd) - Will REA Group Become Your Competitor? - Stepps, accessed October 2025, [https://www.stepps.com.au/business/will-rea-group-become-your-competitor/](https://www.stepps.com.au/business/will-rea-group-become-your-competitor/) - Final report in the Digital Platforms Inquiry charts the way forward on protecting consumers and small businesses from harm in digital markets - Sparke Helmore Lawyers, accessed October 2025, [https://www.sparke.com.au/insights/final-report-in-the-digital-platforms-inquiry-charts-the-way-forward-on-protecting-consumers-and-small-businesses-from-harm-in-digital-markets/](https://www.sparke.com.au/insights/final-report-in-the-digital-platforms-inquiry-charts-the-way-forward-on-protecting-consumers-and-small-businesses-from-harm-in-digital-markets/) - Regulatory reform in digital platform markets is needed to improve competition and consumer outcomes | ACCC, accessed October 2025, [https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/regulatory-reform-in-digital-platform-markets-is-needed-to-improve-competition-and-consumer-outcomes](https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/regulatory-reform-in-digital-platform-markets-is-needed-to-improve-competition-and-consumer-outcomes) - From Inquiry to Action: The Final DPSI Report and the Future for Digital Platforms in Australia - Clifford Chance, accessed October 2025, [https://www.cliffordchance.com/insights/resources/blogs/antitrust-fdi-insights/2025/07/final-dpsi-report-and-future-for-digital-platforms-in-australia.html](https://www.cliffordchance.com/insights/resources/blogs/antitrust-fdi-insights/2025/07/final-dpsi-report-and-future-for-digital-platforms-in-australia.html) - Misuse of market power prohibition broadened | Global law firm - Norton Rose Fulbright, accessed October 2025, [https://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/en/knowledge/publications/bbcdff61/misuse-of-market-power-prohibition-broadened](https://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/en/knowledge/publications/bbcdff61/misuse-of-market-power-prohibition-broadened) - misuse of market power in australia and abuse of dominance in canada: two legislated effects tests for unilateral conduct katharine kemp - AustLII, accessed October 2025, [https://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/UNSWLRS/2018/85.pdf](https://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/UNSWLRS/2018/85.pdf)